<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions for Atheists: Mixed Atheist/Theist Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-105147</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-105147</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Julie, you got some blowback from an unrelated discussion. I don&#039;t think Mike or Pither were claiming that their definition IS what faith means in some essential sense. Words don&#039;t have meanings outside of how they are collectively used, and often opposing sides will struggle over &quot;ownership&quot; of a word. Part of being precise with language is knowing how different audiences are likely to respond to a given word, and if you are using a connotation peculiar to some sub-group, to make this clear implicitly or explicitly.

I think you will find that &quot;faithless&quot; and &quot;unfaithful&quot; are used mainly pejoratively, except for some attempts to redefine &quot;faithless&quot; (along with &quot;godless&quot;) as positive, much like gays redefined &quot;queer&quot;. When I see the word faithless used in this context, it doesn&#039;t bother me at all and I don&#039;t feel the need to point out the &quot;dictionary&quot; definition to people who are obviously using the word in a different and perfectly legitimate way.

Sorry about the grammatical error in my post. You may take points off for the typo if you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Julie, you got some blowback from an unrelated discussion. I don&#8217;t think Mike or Pither were claiming that their definition IS what faith means in some essential sense. Words don&#8217;t have meanings outside of how they are collectively used, and often opposing sides will struggle over &#8220;ownership&#8221; of a word. Part of being precise with language is knowing how different audiences are likely to respond to a given word, and if you are using a connotation peculiar to some sub-group, to make this clear implicitly or explicitly.</p>
<p>I think you will find that &#8220;faithless&#8221; and &#8220;unfaithful&#8221; are used mainly pejoratively, except for some attempts to redefine &#8220;faithless&#8221; (along with &#8220;godless&#8221;) as positive, much like gays redefined &#8220;queer&#8221;. When I see the word faithless used in this context, it doesn&#8217;t bother me at all and I don&#8217;t feel the need to point out the &#8220;dictionary&#8221; definition to people who are obviously using the word in a different and perfectly legitimate way.</p>
<p>Sorry about the grammatical error in my post. You may take points off for the typo if you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-105137</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-105137</guid>
		<description>Monkeymind, I doubt you&#039;ll look back here, since this thread has disappeared over the horizon, but the &quot;if&quot; part of your your comment is exactly the point.  If one sees one&#039;s duty as working for the destruction of the US, then faith &quot;means&quot; something else, according to the way you&#039;re interpreting it.  Faith itself doesn&#039;t get to pick its target.  People can have faith in lots of different things.  Pither&#039;s point was that faith can be inherently positive, but it can&#039;t.

A person can be faithless or unfaithful only relative to another term.

I&#039;m no prescriptivist, but I like to be precise with language.

By the way, you messed up your subject / verb agreement in your first sentence.  Put that in your hackles and smoke it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkeymind, I doubt you&#8217;ll look back here, since this thread has disappeared over the horizon, but the &#8220;if&#8221; part of your your comment is exactly the point.  If one sees one&#8217;s duty as working for the destruction of the US, then faith &#8220;means&#8221; something else, according to the way you&#8217;re interpreting it.  Faith itself doesn&#8217;t get to pick its target.  People can have faith in lots of different things.  Pither&#8217;s point was that faith can be inherently positive, but it can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>A person can be faithless or unfaithful only relative to another term.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no prescriptivist, but I like to be precise with language.</p>
<p>By the way, you messed up your subject / verb agreement in your first sentence.  Put that in your hackles and smoke it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104663</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;MikeClawson said,

Agreed monkeymind. Didn’t we just have this conversation in the last thread I put up? :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s glory for you!

And by glory I mean, here we go again! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>MikeClawson said,</p>
<p>Agreed monkeymind. Didn’t we just have this conversation in the last thread I put up? <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s glory for you!</p>
<p>And by glory I mean, here we go again! <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104662</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104662</guid>
		<description>Julie - I don&#039;t see how Pither&#039;s definitions is all that different than the Merriam Webster definition:

&lt;blockquote&gt;1 a: allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1): fidelity to one’s promises (2): sincerity of intentions&lt;/blockquote&gt;

if one sees one&#039;s duty and promises as working for positive change in the world

The meaning of faith can certainly &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; be restricted to &quot;belief without evidence.&quot;  I think you&#039;ll have considerable trouble explaining away the meanings of &quot;faithless&quot; and &quot;unfaithful&quot; if you do.

Polysemy&#039;s a bitch, I know. Sorry for the sarcasm but linguistic prescriptivism really raises my hackles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie &#8211; I don&#8217;t see how Pither&#8217;s definitions is all that different than the Merriam Webster definition:</p>
<blockquote><p>1 a: allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1): fidelity to one’s promises (2): sincerity of intentions</p></blockquote>
<p>if one sees one&#8217;s duty and promises as working for positive change in the world</p>
<p>The meaning of faith can certainly <strong>not</strong> be restricted to &#8220;belief without evidence.&#8221;  I think you&#8217;ll have considerable trouble explaining away the meanings of &#8220;faithless&#8221; and &#8220;unfaithful&#8221; if you do.</p>
<p>Polysemy&#8217;s a bitch, I know. Sorry for the sarcasm but linguistic prescriptivism really raises my hackles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104654</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104654</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pither:  Faith, when defined as a hopeful optimism and motivation to do what we think is right in spite of opposition or complacency.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OK, monkeymind, but it still doesn&#039;t mean this!  The point is that it was being redefined incorrectly here.  Bring on whatever dictionary you like, and get as sarcastic with me as you please.  I can totally take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pither:  Faith, when defined as a hopeful optimism and motivation to do what we think is right in spite of opposition or complacency.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, monkeymind, but it still doesn&#8217;t mean this!  The point is that it was being redefined incorrectly here.  Bring on whatever dictionary you like, and get as sarcastic with me as you please.  I can totally take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeClawson</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104651</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeClawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104651</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hooboy, I am so tired of the “my abridged dictionary has the final word on all the possible denotations and connotations of word X” thing. Look it up in the OED and let’s talk.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed monkeymind. Didn&#039;t we just have this conversation in the last thread I put up? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hooboy, I am so tired of the “my abridged dictionary has the final word on all the possible denotations and connotations of word X” thing. Look it up in the OED and let’s talk.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed monkeymind. Didn&#8217;t we just have this conversation in the last thread I put up? <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104641</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104641</guid>
		<description>Well, I suppose I&#039;ll join the fray. Eighteen years ago, I met a cute Atheist. At the time I was a liberal and rather tepid, CEO sort of Christian. We never really talked about it and we certainly never argued, but I would bring his Atheism up every so often because I was fascinated by what could fill the void left by belief. Years on and I still think nothing fills it, it&#039;s just that if you examine religious beliefs hard enough they get weathered down by evidence until finally there&#039;s nothing left. At least that&#039;s what I think happened to me.
I still show up at a Unitarian church once in a great while, when I miss the community of faith. But that&#039;s about it, and I go alone even though the congregation welcomes Atheists. My husband won&#039;t set foot inside and we&#039;re both fine with that. That way he can make breakfast. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I suppose I&#8217;ll join the fray. Eighteen years ago, I met a cute Atheist. At the time I was a liberal and rather tepid, CEO sort of Christian. We never really talked about it and we certainly never argued, but I would bring his Atheism up every so often because I was fascinated by what could fill the void left by belief. Years on and I still think nothing fills it, it&#8217;s just that if you examine religious beliefs hard enough they get weathered down by evidence until finally there&#8217;s nothing left. At least that&#8217;s what I think happened to me.<br />
I still show up at a Unitarian church once in a great while, when I miss the community of faith. But that&#8217;s about it, and I go alone even though the congregation welcomes Atheists. My husband won&#8217;t set foot inside and we&#8217;re both fine with that. That way he can make breakfast. <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104613</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104613</guid>
		<description>Julie, my Merriam Webster lists this as the first definition of faith:

&lt;blockquote&gt;1 a: allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1): fidelity to one&#039;s promises (2): sincerity of intentions&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you don’t like what faith means, well, that’s a different story. But that’s what it means!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, my Merriam Webster lists this as the first definition of faith:</p>
<blockquote><p>1 a: allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1): fidelity to one&#8217;s promises (2): sincerity of intentions</p></blockquote>
<p>If you don’t like what faith means, well, that’s a different story. But that’s what it means!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeymind</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104612</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104612</guid>
		<description>Hooboy, I am so tired of the &quot;my abridged dictionary has the final word on all the possible denotations and connotations of  word X&quot; thing. Look it up in the OED and let&#039;s talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooboy, I am so tired of the &#8220;my abridged dictionary has the final word on all the possible denotations and connotations of  word X&#8221; thing. Look it up in the OED and let&#8217;s talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104599</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/12/19/questions-for-atheists-mixed-atheistchristian-relationships/#comment-104599</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Mike, but I don&#039;t think you can redefine faith because you want to.  Here&#039;s the definition from my Apple dictionary:

1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something. 2 strong belief in God or in the doctrines of religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.

Miko&#039;s definition is closer than Pither&#039;s according to the above.  Hopeful optimism and do-gooding are not faith, although they may grow out of faith.  Faith is not necessarily a positive quality, in the eyes of atheists, although in our society it has a positive connotation.  Dispelling that connotation and looking objectively at the notion of faith, which IS belief without proof, is important.

And that last paragraph is probably why I couldn&#039;t be in a relationship with a believer!  Ha ha, I&#039;m also an English teacher, by the way, so quibbling about words and definitions just comes naturally to me.  And I think preciseness of language is crucial.

If you don&#039;t like what faith means, well, that&#039;s a different story.  But that&#039;s what it means!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Mike, but I don&#8217;t think you can redefine faith because you want to.  Here&#8217;s the definition from my Apple dictionary:</p>
<p>1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something. 2 strong belief in God or in the doctrines of religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.</p>
<p>Miko&#8217;s definition is closer than Pither&#8217;s according to the above.  Hopeful optimism and do-gooding are not faith, although they may grow out of faith.  Faith is not necessarily a positive quality, in the eyes of atheists, although in our society it has a positive connotation.  Dispelling that connotation and looking objectively at the notion of faith, which IS belief without proof, is important.</p>
<p>And that last paragraph is probably why I couldn&#8217;t be in a relationship with a believer!  Ha ha, I&#8217;m also an English teacher, by the way, so quibbling about words and definitions just comes naturally to me.  And I think preciseness of language is crucial.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like what faith means, well, that&#8217;s a different story.  But that&#8217;s what it means!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/325 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 12:42:16 -->
