Comments on: Categorizing Religion Books http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/ by Hemant Mehta Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Cade http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-115118 Cade Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:27:53 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-115118 Sometimes, in Barnes and Nobel, I discretely walk by the religion section and move one of the bibles to the religious fiction section. It's my little way of making a point. Sometimes, in Barnes and Nobel, I discretely walk by the religion section and move one of the bibles to the religious fiction section. It’s my little way of making a point.

]]> By: olvlzl, no ism, no ist http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114925 olvlzl, no ism, no ist Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:33:37 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114925 I'd be afraid it might lead to fist fights between religious fundamentalists and those who are buying Dawkins and Dennett. That is why they don't put Left Behind stuff next to The God Delusion now, isn't it? I’d be afraid it might lead to fist fights between religious fundamentalists and those who are buying Dawkins and Dennett. That is why they don’t put Left Behind stuff next to The God Delusion now, isn’t it?

]]> By: Mriana http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114836 Mriana Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:43:44 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114836 Well it's about time they put religion in the myth section. I've always wondered why they didn't before. Thing is Behe should not be in science. That doesn't make sense either. Well it’s about time they put religion in the myth section. I’ve always wondered why they didn’t before. Thing is Behe should not be in science. That doesn’t make sense either.

]]> By: Siamang http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114834 Siamang Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:33:37 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/01/14/categorizing-religion-books/#comment-114834 Radical atheists would still complain that the sign is redundant. CS Lewis regarded Christianity as the true myth. So I guess he wouldn't have a problem with this. Radical atheists would still complain that the sign is redundant.

CS Lewis regarded Christianity as the true myth. So I guess he wouldn’t have a problem with this.

]]>