<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 90 Day Jane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 10:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Strachan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128571</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Strachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128571</guid>
		<description>Further to my post yesterday, I can report that my virus scanner found a Trojan Horse  (Generic6.AILI and Generic6.AILF), and a virus  (Downloader.Zlob) on my computer, the day after I got caught with the porn trap.

No one seems to have noticed here that the link posted by j-friend, and also at the top of this page (&quot;counting down to 90&quot;) is a direct link to a doctored version of the original 90DayJane blog.  It can easily be seen by examining the &quot;video links&quot;, that this is a fake link - it is not an applet, but a JPEG bitmap made to look like the applet.

If you are at all responsible you should remove both these links from this page because at the moment you are enabling the spread of porn.  I posted a similar warning on a Psych central blog that had a similar link posted by j-friend, and they removed the offending link within a few minutes.

Iain

&lt;i&gt;[Hemant&#039;s note: The post is deleted.]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my post yesterday, I can report that my virus scanner found a Trojan Horse  (Generic6.AILI and Generic6.AILF), and a virus  (Downloader.Zlob) on my computer, the day after I got caught with the porn trap.</p>
<p>No one seems to have noticed here that the link posted by j-friend, and also at the top of this page (&#8220;counting down to 90&#8243;) is a direct link to a doctored version of the original 90DayJane blog.  It can easily be seen by examining the &#8220;video links&#8221;, that this is a fake link &#8211; it is not an applet, but a JPEG bitmap made to look like the applet.</p>
<p>If you are at all responsible you should remove both these links from this page because at the moment you are enabling the spread of porn.  I posted a similar warning on a Psych central blog that had a similar link posted by j-friend, and they removed the offending link within a few minutes.</p>
<p>Iain</p>
<p><i>[Hemant's note: The post is deleted.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secular Dignity</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128302</link>
		<dc:creator>Secular Dignity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128302</guid>
		<description>The new URL says it is an art project. What a shock. I think this is a hoax. 

This kind of reminds me of intelligent design in a way: If Christianity is true, why do Christians have to be deceptive? Surely converting people would be a lot easier if we were all hungry to know God, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new URL says it is an art project. What a shock. I think this is a hoax. </p>
<p>This kind of reminds me of intelligent design in a way: If Christianity is true, why do Christians have to be deceptive? Surely converting people would be a lot easier if we were all hungry to know God, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128191</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128191</guid>
		<description>Come on people, don’t get disheartened. If we try and make her change her mind — maybe, just maybe she’ll restart the countdown:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://kill90dayjane.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://kill90dayjane.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people, don’t get disheartened. If we try and make her change her mind — maybe, just maybe she’ll restart the countdown:</p>
<p><a href="http://kill90dayjane.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://kill90dayjane.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Strachan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128190</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Strachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-128190</guid>
		<description>Your comment person j-friend advertised the revised address for the Jane blog on another bulletin board.  I visited it and got caught with the same porn trap as another of your posters.

I suspect that the revised porno/jane blog isn&#039;t due to Jane at all, but due to people promoting the porn.  Since a poster with the same name promoted the porn-infested version it looks pretty suspicious.  I would delete the link if I were you.  The original jane blog has been taken down ( 90dayjane.blogspot.com). The videos posted there didn&#039;t lead to porn but played out as expected.  The new link redirects to a subtly different name 90-day-jane.blogspot.com.  (Note the hyphens).  Interesting to know where j-friend  (Jane&#039;s friend?) got the link from .....

Also, I originally posted a comment on the new blog as I thought it was due to Jane to warn that it might have been &quot;hacked&quot; to link to porn.  The comments are moderated - plenty more comments appeared after I posted, but mine didn&#039;t appear.  Clearly my comment got &quot;moderated out&quot; because the owners of the blog didn&#039;t want to give the game away.

The new site is a fake on top of a fake, and is being used to promote porn.

&lt;i&gt;[Hemant&#039;s note: Thanks.  The post in question is deleted.]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment person j-friend advertised the revised address for the Jane blog on another bulletin board.  I visited it and got caught with the same porn trap as another of your posters.</p>
<p>I suspect that the revised porno/jane blog isn&#8217;t due to Jane at all, but due to people promoting the porn.  Since a poster with the same name promoted the porn-infested version it looks pretty suspicious.  I would delete the link if I were you.  The original jane blog has been taken down ( 90dayjane.blogspot.com). The videos posted there didn&#8217;t lead to porn but played out as expected.  The new link redirects to a subtly different name 90-day-jane.blogspot.com.  (Note the hyphens).  Interesting to know where j-friend  (Jane&#8217;s friend?) got the link from &#8230;..</p>
<p>Also, I originally posted a comment on the new blog as I thought it was due to Jane to warn that it might have been &#8220;hacked&#8221; to link to porn.  The comments are moderated &#8211; plenty more comments appeared after I posted, but mine didn&#8217;t appear.  Clearly my comment got &#8220;moderated out&#8221; because the owners of the blog didn&#8217;t want to give the game away.</p>
<p>The new site is a fake on top of a fake, and is being used to promote porn.</p>
<p><i>[Hemant's note: Thanks.  The post in question is deleted.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodie</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127866</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with the Fight Club fan. It&#039;s the first thing I thought of when I read the excerpt. If you are going to make a big bizarre stink about killing yourself, could you at least write something original?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the Fight Club fan. It&#8217;s the first thing I thought of when I read the excerpt. If you are going to make a big bizarre stink about killing yourself, could you at least write something original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mriana</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127857</guid>
		<description>I told it &quot;No&quot; about the download and according to my son, I was &quot;porn bombed&quot;.  I wasn&#039;t pleased with what I saw, esp when I said &quot;No!&quot;  :mad:  I&#039;ve been scanning, updating (which wasn&#039;t needed), and scanning again.  Haven&#039;t found anything or had any problems, but even if you say &quot;no&quot; it will still get you.  My spyware/malware says I have nothing and my virus scanner says I&#039;m clean, but who knows.  That&#039;s rather shocking when you say &quot;no&quot; to a download.  My suggestion is don&#039;t even look at the site.

My home page is still the same, so I may have lucked out with a brower hijacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told it &#8220;No&#8221; about the download and according to my son, I was &#8220;porn bombed&#8221;.  I wasn&#8217;t pleased with what I saw, esp when I said &#8220;No!&#8221;  <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':mad:' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ve been scanning, updating (which wasn&#8217;t needed), and scanning again.  Haven&#8217;t found anything or had any problems, but even if you say &#8220;no&#8221; it will still get you.  My spyware/malware says I have nothing and my virus scanner says I&#8217;m clean, but who knows.  That&#8217;s rather shocking when you say &#8220;no&#8221; to a download.  My suggestion is don&#8217;t even look at the site.</p>
<p>My home page is still the same, so I may have lucked out with a brower hijacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanut</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127842</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127842</guid>
		<description>If you hate 90 Day Jane, you&#039;ll love this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://90daypbj.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://90daypbj.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hate 90 Day Jane, you&#8217;ll love this: <a href="http://90daypbj.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://90daypbj.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127841</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127841</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Be aware!!!! I went to Jane 90s blog and clicked to play the video she has.  It told me I needed some program to view it and to click here. Well like an idiot, without thinking I clicked.

My browser has now been hijacked and I have spent all night trying to get rid of it.   Maybe that&#039;s the ploy....to infect as many browsers as she can by making us curious to see what&#039;s happening next!

Be careful if you go to her blog!!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Be aware!!!! I went to Jane 90s blog and clicked to play the video she has.  It told me I needed some program to view it and to click here. Well like an idiot, without thinking I clicked.</p>
<p>My browser has now been hijacked and I have spent all night trying to get rid of it.   Maybe that&#8217;s the ploy&#8230;.to infect as many browsers as she can by making us curious to see what&#8217;s happening next!</p>
<p>Be careful if you go to her blog!!</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; 90 Day Jane Ain&#8217;t Seen Nothing Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127680</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; 90 Day Jane Ain&#8217;t Seen Nothing Yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127680</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote about the 90 Day Jane blog. The blog is the (supposed) brainchild of &#8220;Jane,&#8221; a girl who is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote about the 90 Day Jane blog. The blog is the (supposed) brainchild of &#8220;Jane,&#8221; a girl who is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obfg</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127659</link>
		<dc:creator>obfg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/11/90-day-jane/#comment-127659</guid>
		<description>I think she&#039;s a Xian sock-puppet.

What a wonderful example she&#039;ll be for all the fundy nitwits to use to demonstrate the &quot;evils&quot; of atheism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she&#8217;s a Xian sock-puppet.</p>
<p>What a wonderful example she&#8217;ll be for all the fundy nitwits to use to demonstrate the &#8220;evils&#8221; of atheism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/385 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-27 06:04:30 -->
