<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lewis Black&#8217;s The Root of All Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 15:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-155827</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-155827</guid>
		<description>the problem with the show is that it is based off of a good recurring skit idea, and tried to stretch it into a whole show. they go to far. it stops being funny. it just does. 

i love everyone involved, lewis black and the comedians, but this show is a disaster. 

also, colbert rocks, i don&#039;t even know what you are talking about,.


also, atheists don&#039;t believe there is no god, we believe lack belief in a god. the minimum required for being an atheist is that, although it is usually called &quot;agnostic,&quot; (which really is more of a debating stage than a philosophy.) although i am the first to admit there are more extreme atheists out there. er, in here.

i consider myself an apathetic atheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem with the show is that it is based off of a good recurring skit idea, and tried to stretch it into a whole show. they go to far. it stops being funny. it just does. </p>
<p>i love everyone involved, lewis black and the comedians, but this show is a disaster. </p>
<p>also, colbert rocks, i don&#8217;t even know what you are talking about,.</p>
<p>also, atheists don&#8217;t believe there is no god, we believe lack belief in a god. the minimum required for being an atheist is that, although it is usually called &#8220;agnostic,&#8221; (which really is more of a debating stage than a philosophy.) although i am the first to admit there are more extreme atheists out there. er, in here.</p>
<p>i consider myself an apathetic atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-148336</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-148336</guid>
		<description>&quot;My family is from Ireland so I can bash the Church.&quot;

Wow....you&#039;ve convinced me.  The Protestants in Britain killed 1 million Irish because they were Catholic.  But who cares about that, we hate Catholics!

Whatever happened to live and let live.  I though atheists would be leading the charge for this.  Leave people alone.  

And for those of you that don&#039;t think its hate speech, your getting dangerously close.  The Catholic Church wouldn&#039;t use words like you do to describe your fellow human beings.  The reality is that Catholics are an OK minority to bash...period.  If only you made comments like this about Jews....

And speaking of Jews.  Go research the inquisition.  Its proven now that the numbers were vastly exaggerated.  That&#039;s just another anti-Catholic slander.  

I wonder what would happen if it was the Root of All Evil:  &quot;Jews or Muslims&quot;.  Methinks, the show would be canceled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My family is from Ireland so I can bash the Church.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow&#8230;.you&#8217;ve convinced me.  The Protestants in Britain killed 1 million Irish because they were Catholic.  But who cares about that, we hate Catholics!</p>
<p>Whatever happened to live and let live.  I though atheists would be leading the charge for this.  Leave people alone.  </p>
<p>And for those of you that don&#8217;t think its hate speech, your getting dangerously close.  The Catholic Church wouldn&#8217;t use words like you do to describe your fellow human beings.  The reality is that Catholics are an OK minority to bash&#8230;period.  If only you made comments like this about Jews&#8230;.</p>
<p>And speaking of Jews.  Go research the inquisition.  Its proven now that the numbers were vastly exaggerated.  That&#8217;s just another anti-Catholic slander.  </p>
<p>I wonder what would happen if it was the Root of All Evil:  &#8220;Jews or Muslims&#8221;.  Methinks, the show would be canceled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: complete disbelief</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-143751</link>
		<dc:creator>complete disbelief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-143751</guid>
		<description>Wow, you have an entire website dedicated to your belief that there is no god(s)?

That&#039;s dedication, keep the faith brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you have an entire website dedicated to your belief that there is no god(s)?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s dedication, keep the faith brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secular Dignity</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-141155</link>
		<dc:creator>Secular Dignity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-141155</guid>
		<description>I do not think it is wrong to criticize the Catholic Church either. For one thing: If you don&#039;t want to be criticized, then do not go around telling people what to do with their lives.

I think the pedophilia scandal will go down in history as one of the stupidest and most corrupt moves in human history. The percentage of priests that did the bad thing was very small. I think it was less than five percent. The REAL scandal is what the church did next: They covered it up. (Haven&#039;t these guys heard of Watergate?) The Catholic Church looks out for the Catholic Church. By that I mean the institution looks out for the institution, not its constituents.

And now dioceses are going bankrupt because of the actions of 1/20th of the priests. Stupid stupid stupid. Why should I respect these people?

Plus my family is from Ireland. I think it is fair to say that the Irish have done more for the Catholic Church than the Catholic Church has done for the Irish. Lots of pretty buildings were being built while people were dying for their faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think it is wrong to criticize the Catholic Church either. For one thing: If you don&#8217;t want to be criticized, then do not go around telling people what to do with their lives.</p>
<p>I think the pedophilia scandal will go down in history as one of the stupidest and most corrupt moves in human history. The percentage of priests that did the bad thing was very small. I think it was less than five percent. The REAL scandal is what the church did next: They covered it up. (Haven&#8217;t these guys heard of Watergate?) The Catholic Church looks out for the Catholic Church. By that I mean the institution looks out for the institution, not its constituents.</p>
<p>And now dioceses are going bankrupt because of the actions of 1/20th of the priests. Stupid stupid stupid. Why should I respect these people?</p>
<p>Plus my family is from Ireland. I think it is fair to say that the Irish have done more for the Catholic Church than the Catholic Church has done for the Irish. Lots of pretty buildings were being built while people were dying for their faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pritzlaff</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140412</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pritzlaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140412</guid>
		<description>BTW guys, it is not &quot;hate speech&quot; to criticize the Catholic church.  In fact, this is exactly what I was talking about in my previous comment.  Someone speaks one uncomfortable truth and all of a sudden he&#039;s &quot;spewing hate&quot;.  Hate speech is when someone says something rude about some group because he hates them.  It is not rude to say something that actually has basis in fact.  It is not hateful to say something you believe if you are not doing it out of hate.  Hate speech is characterized by the fact that it&#039;s irrational.  (For instance, racism is irrational, because to say one group of people is &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; this way or &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; that way is irrational and incorrect, because it ignores stereotypes, and the fact that every group is made up of individuals.)

That said, if someone says that the Catholic Church is made up of molesters, and he&#039;s not saying it because of evidence he has but because he simply hates the catholic church, that would be hate speech.  But if he has good evidence, and he&#039;s not saying it out of hate but simply because it is something he observed, then it&#039;s not hate speech.  This is a problem, because there are times when we can&#039;t distinguish the people who are saying something simply because they are hateful from the people who are saying something simply because they actually think it&#039;s the truth and have good evidence that it is.  For instance, there are some (not many) atheists who disparage religion simply because they hate it, but most atheists who criticize religion are not doing it hatefully, just fairly and strongly, because they think  what they&#039;re saying is the truth and, dare I say, have good evidence that it is.  

Also, if anyone said that &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; catholics were molesters, or that &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; of any group were anything (that isn&#039;t common in everyday society), then it would pretty much always be hate speech, because there&#039;s almost never an instance where every individual in a group is the same as every other individual, except on matters that are orthodox or dogmatic for that particular group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW guys, it is not &#8220;hate speech&#8221; to criticize the Catholic church.  In fact, this is exactly what I was talking about in my previous comment.  Someone speaks one uncomfortable truth and all of a sudden he&#8217;s &#8220;spewing hate&#8221;.  Hate speech is when someone says something rude about some group because he hates them.  It is not rude to say something that actually has basis in fact.  It is not hateful to say something you believe if you are not doing it out of hate.  Hate speech is characterized by the fact that it&#8217;s irrational.  (For instance, racism is irrational, because to say one group of people is <em>always</em> this way or <em>always</em> that way is irrational and incorrect, because it ignores stereotypes, and the fact that every group is made up of individuals.)</p>
<p>That said, if someone says that the Catholic Church is made up of molesters, and he&#8217;s not saying it because of evidence he has but because he simply hates the catholic church, that would be hate speech.  But if he has good evidence, and he&#8217;s not saying it out of hate but simply because it is something he observed, then it&#8217;s not hate speech.  This is a problem, because there are times when we can&#8217;t distinguish the people who are saying something simply because they are hateful from the people who are saying something simply because they actually think it&#8217;s the truth and have good evidence that it is.  For instance, there are some (not many) atheists who disparage religion simply because they hate it, but most atheists who criticize religion are not doing it hatefully, just fairly and strongly, because they think  what they&#8217;re saying is the truth and, dare I say, have good evidence that it is.  </p>
<p>Also, if anyone said that <em>all</em> catholics were molesters, or that <em>all</em> of any group were anything (that isn&#8217;t common in everyday society), then it would pretty much always be hate speech, because there&#8217;s almost never an instance where every individual in a group is the same as every other individual, except on matters that are orthodox or dogmatic for that particular group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pritzlaff</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140411</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pritzlaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140411</guid>
		<description>Usually I love Black, but this show isn&#039;t very good for him.  He doesn&#039;t get a lot of lines.  And that&#039;s the other thing, it feels very scripted.  The format feels stuffy and the laughs fake.

However, I do like that the show is actually incorporating the concept of &quot;evil&quot;.  My generation is so culturally relativistic that it&#039;s hard to get anyone to make any kind of moral judgements at all.  While I do not believe there&#039;s an absolute good or an absolute evil, I get frustrated when my fellow liberals extrapolate this kind of thinking into one where we take no stands at all.  Everything is so wishy washy in our culture nowadays.  Sure, there are many instances where we should be agnostic and completely uncertain, but there are also many instances where it is completely justified to feel that one is probably right and the others are probably wrong.  For instance, I think that Islam is, by and large, wrong.  It is mostly a religion of extremists.  Not all Muslims are extremists, of course -- it should go without saying.  But at the same time that we&#039;re being careful not to be racist we can still take a stand and say that most Muslims are fundamentalists.  We don&#039;t have to be vague and overly &quot;fair&quot; (and it isn&#039;t being fair at all, is it?  The only thing that&#039;s truly fair is telling the truth... the whole truth.)  It&#039;s so frustrating, because we should be humble and we should realize that in any given circumstance we could easily be wrong, but that doesn&#039;t mean that we can&#039;t say that we could also be right.  And when the evidence points overwhelmingly in that direction, we should not be scared to say that we are very likely correct.

You know what I mean?

Unfortunately, this show may not do so well with my generation.  A lot of people may feel it&#039;s too rude and that the comedians on the show are bigots.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I love Black, but this show isn&#8217;t very good for him.  He doesn&#8217;t get a lot of lines.  And that&#8217;s the other thing, it feels very scripted.  The format feels stuffy and the laughs fake.</p>
<p>However, I do like that the show is actually incorporating the concept of &#8220;evil&#8221;.  My generation is so culturally relativistic that it&#8217;s hard to get anyone to make any kind of moral judgements at all.  While I do not believe there&#8217;s an absolute good or an absolute evil, I get frustrated when my fellow liberals extrapolate this kind of thinking into one where we take no stands at all.  Everything is so wishy washy in our culture nowadays.  Sure, there are many instances where we should be agnostic and completely uncertain, but there are also many instances where it is completely justified to feel that one is probably right and the others are probably wrong.  For instance, I think that Islam is, by and large, wrong.  It is mostly a religion of extremists.  Not all Muslims are extremists, of course &#8212; it should go without saying.  But at the same time that we&#8217;re being careful not to be racist we can still take a stand and say that most Muslims are fundamentalists.  We don&#8217;t have to be vague and overly &#8220;fair&#8221; (and it isn&#8217;t being fair at all, is it?  The only thing that&#8217;s truly fair is telling the truth&#8230; the whole truth.)  It&#8217;s so frustrating, because we should be humble and we should realize that in any given circumstance we could easily be wrong, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that we can&#8217;t say that we could also be right.  And when the evidence points overwhelmingly in that direction, we should not be scared to say that we are very likely correct.</p>
<p>You know what I mean?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this show may not do so well with my generation.  A lot of people may feel it&#8217;s too rude and that the comedians on the show are bigots.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WICK</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140384</link>
		<dc:creator>WICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140384</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eACk4pjxclA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my tribute&lt;/a&gt; to all the &quot;I found a holy image in a piece of cheese&quot; crowd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eACk4pjxclA" rel="nofollow">my tribute</a> to all the &#8220;I found a holy image in a piece of cheese&#8221; crowd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140377</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140377</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, pointing at the Pope “wearing a dress” and condemning homosexuals isn’t even an argument and everyone knows it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s a joke, son. The show is on Comedy Central. 

Lighten up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, pointing at the Pope “wearing a dress” and condemning homosexuals isn’t even an argument and everyone knows it. </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a joke, son. The show is on Comedy Central. </p>
<p>Lighten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140358</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but if I say “I hate homos” (which I don’t) you would consider that hate speech. If someone says hateful, spiteful things about the Church, why is this not hate speech? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hate speech (or, say, hate crimes) is designed to target a minority group and threaten them by making an example of one member of the group.  This is why  threatening/acting out against a small group of people who get discriminated against (say, homos, who die from violence at an alarming rate compared to their counterparts) is a lot worse than saying something about Catholics, who could damn protect their own.


&lt;blockquote&gt;The fact is, it is very easy to say “Priests f*ck little boys” and “The Spanish Inquisition was horrible…” and neglect the fact that the Church still does more than any other organization in the world to alleviate pain and suffering (even pain and suffering it may have had a hand in, at some point, creating).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am curious what proof you have of this.  And what do we mean by &quot;church&quot; here?  The Catholic Church?  If I accept that you are correct, and the Catholic church has alleviated the most suffering, that might be because they are so damn large- perhaps each individual Catholic only does a small amount of service, but because there are so many Catholics, that adds up to more service, while maybe individual Buddists do more per person.  

Also, I would like to claim, sans evidence, that WOMEN do the most to alleviate suffering.  I bet I am right, statistically.  


&lt;blockquote&gt; As I am not a Catholic, I don’t agree with the condom issue, especially in the case of Africa. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Brilliant.  But don&#039;t you think that whole &quot;can&#039;t use condoms, AIDS-ridden Africa&quot; thing might perhaps be cancelling out some of the suffering the Pope is ridding the world of?  Foood for thought.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;However, pointing at the Pope “wearing a dress” and condemning homosexuals isn’t even an argument and everyone knows it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree.  But condemning, say, transexuals for wearing the wrong outfits does make the whole thing a little hypocritical.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;What is further, you can point to any organization and find some way in which that organization has helped screw up the world. Heck, if you shop at Wal-Mart, you’re helping to screw up the world. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  Shop union stores, everyone!  The difference, I suppose, is that no one is claiming Wal-mart has done the most to alleviate suffering of anyone ever (except WOMEN, as I already pointed out.)


&lt;blockquote&gt;It is also easy to chastise the Church while neglecting to put your money where your mouth is and reaching out to care for the fatherless and the widow. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  B to the W, the fatherless and the widow?  Can&#039;t anyone survive without a man these days?  

&lt;blockquote&gt;Dropping money into the Salvation Army bucket at Christmas time to alleviate any guilt and get into the Wal-Mart faster and continue oppressing underpaid laborers in China is not helping the world. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do agree with you here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but if I say “I hate homos” (which I don’t) you would consider that hate speech. If someone says hateful, spiteful things about the Church, why is this not hate speech? </p></blockquote>
<p>Hate speech (or, say, hate crimes) is designed to target a minority group and threaten them by making an example of one member of the group.  This is why  threatening/acting out against a small group of people who get discriminated against (say, homos, who die from violence at an alarming rate compared to their counterparts) is a lot worse than saying something about Catholics, who could damn protect their own.</p>
<blockquote><p>The fact is, it is very easy to say “Priests f*ck little boys” and “The Spanish Inquisition was horrible…” and neglect the fact that the Church still does more than any other organization in the world to alleviate pain and suffering (even pain and suffering it may have had a hand in, at some point, creating).</p></blockquote>
<p>I am curious what proof you have of this.  And what do we mean by &#8220;church&#8221; here?  The Catholic Church?  If I accept that you are correct, and the Catholic church has alleviated the most suffering, that might be because they are so damn large- perhaps each individual Catholic only does a small amount of service, but because there are so many Catholics, that adds up to more service, while maybe individual Buddists do more per person.  </p>
<p>Also, I would like to claim, sans evidence, that WOMEN do the most to alleviate suffering.  I bet I am right, statistically.  </p>
<blockquote><p> As I am not a Catholic, I don’t agree with the condom issue, especially in the case of Africa. </p></blockquote>
<p>Brilliant.  But don&#8217;t you think that whole &#8220;can&#8217;t use condoms, AIDS-ridden Africa&#8221; thing might perhaps be cancelling out some of the suffering the Pope is ridding the world of?  Foood for thought.  </p>
<blockquote><p>However, pointing at the Pope “wearing a dress” and condemning homosexuals isn’t even an argument and everyone knows it. </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  But condemning, say, transexuals for wearing the wrong outfits does make the whole thing a little hypocritical.  </p>
<blockquote><p>What is further, you can point to any organization and find some way in which that organization has helped screw up the world. Heck, if you shop at Wal-Mart, you’re helping to screw up the world. </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  Shop union stores, everyone!  The difference, I suppose, is that no one is claiming Wal-mart has done the most to alleviate suffering of anyone ever (except WOMEN, as I already pointed out.)</p>
<blockquote><p>It is also easy to chastise the Church while neglecting to put your money where your mouth is and reaching out to care for the fatherless and the widow. </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  B to the W, the fatherless and the widow?  Can&#8217;t anyone survive without a man these days?  </p>
<blockquote><p>Dropping money into the Salvation Army bucket at Christmas time to alleviate any guilt and get into the Wal-Mart faster and continue oppressing underpaid laborers in China is not helping the world. </p></blockquote>
<p>I do agree with you here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin's Dagger</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140308</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin's Dagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/03/13/lewis-blacks-the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-140308</guid>
		<description>Black is brilliant. His show sucks. And that lead in episode of SouthPark was a bit substandard as well.  And WTF does anyone expect from Bill Donohue but the same old thing. (Now the SouthPark episode featuring Donohue was excellent.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black is brilliant. His show sucks. And that lead in episode of SouthPark was a bit substandard as well.  And WTF does anyone expect from Bill Donohue but the same old thing. (Now the SouthPark episode featuring Donohue was excellent.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/381 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-27 10:18:37 -->
