<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Porn for You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-153013</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-153013</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps they are the ones without self-control or willpower and really want the choice taken away from them before they set foot in the hotel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree. this is so juvenille what they are doing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perhaps they are the ones without self-control or willpower and really want the choice taken away from them before they set foot in the hotel.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. this is so juvenille what they are doing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152952</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152952</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years.

Finally, he went to a sensible Christian minister who told him to get a couple of magazines and “take care of the situation” whenever necessary. Which of course completely alleviated his fixation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh god, does that sound familiar.

&#039;Course, I eventually got someone to help me &quot;alleviate&quot; my &quot;fixation&quot;, which is one reason I hang around here nowadays...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years.</p>
<p>Finally, he went to a sensible Christian minister who told him to get a couple of magazines and “take care of the situation” whenever necessary. Which of course completely alleviated his fixation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh god, does that sound familiar.</p>
<p>&#8216;Course, I eventually got someone to help me &#8220;alleviate&#8221; my &#8220;fixation&#8221;, which is one reason I hang around here nowadays&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152948</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152948</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As a young man, he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s a problem in the Jewish world as well, among the ultra-Orthodox (the black hat and coat crowd). They&#039;re militant about gender segregation, so they&#039;re never properly socialized, and, as a result, they become obsessed with sex - their rabbis are always enacting some new rule or restriction concerning it. A few weeks ago, in New York, they banned a concert that was going to feature an Orthodox singer - nothing salacious; think &quot;Christian rock&quot; - because there was going to be &quot;mixed seating&quot;! It goes on all the time.

Fortunately, our fundies are much smaller in number and don&#039;t, for the most part, get involved in legislation or the political process (outside of Israel), so they&#039;re easier to ignore than their Christian counterparts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As a young man, he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a problem in the Jewish world as well, among the ultra-Orthodox (the black hat and coat crowd). They&#8217;re militant about gender segregation, so they&#8217;re never properly socialized, and, as a result, they become obsessed with sex &#8211; their rabbis are always enacting some new rule or restriction concerning it. A few weeks ago, in New York, they banned a concert that was going to feature an Orthodox singer &#8211; nothing salacious; think &#8220;Christian rock&#8221; &#8211; because there was going to be &#8220;mixed seating&#8221;! It goes on all the time.</p>
<p>Fortunately, our fundies are much smaller in number and don&#8217;t, for the most part, get involved in legislation or the political process (outside of Israel), so they&#8217;re easier to ignore than their Christian counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152944</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;just before I left church, there was an increasing emphasis on the problem of “porn addiction.” there was even a ministry created to address it, with accountability partners and everything. so maybe this is an expansion of those programs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, probably so. There was a big emphasis on &quot;porn addiction&quot; in my church also. They called it something like, &quot;Every Man&#039;s Burden.&quot; (I guess they haven&#039;t figured out that there&#039;s a growing industry marketing porn directly to women ...)

Dave Dickerson, a former evangelical and a storyteller, did a great segment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thisamericanlife.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This American Life&lt;/a&gt; a few years ago (episode 332). As a young man, he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years. 

Finally, he went to a sensible Christian minister who told him to get a couple of magazines and &quot;take care of the situation&quot; whenever necessary. Which of course completely alleviated his fixation. It&#039;s really a wonderful story - both hilarious and poignant, as are all of his tales of his Christian past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>just before I left church, there was an increasing emphasis on the problem of “porn addiction.” there was even a ministry created to address it, with accountability partners and everything. so maybe this is an expansion of those programs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, probably so. There was a big emphasis on &#8220;porn addiction&#8221; in my church also. They called it something like, &#8220;Every Man&#8217;s Burden.&#8221; (I guess they haven&#8217;t figured out that there&#8217;s a growing industry marketing porn directly to women &#8230;)</p>
<p>Dave Dickerson, a former evangelical and a storyteller, did a great segment on <a href="http://www.thisamericanlife.org" rel="nofollow">This American Life</a> a few years ago (episode 332). As a young man, he took seriously the evangelical teaching that Christians should not entertain any lustful thoughts, or masturbate. As a result, the poor guy was absolutely tormented by lustful thoughts and resulting guilt 24/7 during all his college years. </p>
<p>Finally, he went to a sensible Christian minister who told him to get a couple of magazines and &#8220;take care of the situation&#8221; whenever necessary. Which of course completely alleviated his fixation. It&#8217;s really a wonderful story &#8211; both hilarious and poignant, as are all of his tales of his Christian past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152905</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152905</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. Probably isn&#039;t worth it.

I don&#039;t suppose there are any Unitarians in Tenn? We&#039;re loaded with them up here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. Probably isn&#8217;t worth it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t suppose there are any Unitarians in Tenn? We&#8217;re loaded with them up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152898</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152898</guid>
		<description>@cipher

It&#039;s been a month since I looked it up, so I was off a by $10. Yeah, maybe we&#039;ll check out a United Methodist church or something. I just really don&#039;t feel like sitting through a few hours of how we have to pray together, attend church, and trust Jesus to avoid a divorce, just to save $60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cipher</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a month since I looked it up, so I was off a by $10. Yeah, maybe we&#8217;ll check out a United Methodist church or something. I just really don&#8217;t feel like sitting through a few hours of how we have to pray together, attend church, and trust Jesus to avoid a divorce, just to save $60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152895</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152895</guid>
		<description>Derek,

I just looked it up here:

http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/p/tennessee.htm

It says you can actually save $60 with counseling. There&#039;s a form you have to have the therapist complete. He/she can be a licensed therapist or an &quot;official representative of a religious institution&quot;. Surely there must be a liberal Christian somewhere in Tennessee!

$100 - damn. The most it costs up here in Mass is $50, and that&#039;s in Boston. I think if you go out to the rural parts of the state, it&#039;s still only a few bucks.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek,</p>
<p>I just looked it up here:</p>
<p><a href="http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/p/tennessee.htm" rel="nofollow">http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/p/tennessee.htm</a></p>
<p>It says you can actually save $60 with counseling. There&#8217;s a form you have to have the therapist complete. He/she can be a licensed therapist or an &#8220;official representative of a religious institution&#8221;. Surely there must be a liberal Christian somewhere in Tennessee!</p>
<p>$100 &#8211; damn. The most it costs up here in Mass is $50, and that&#8217;s in Boston. I think if you go out to the rural parts of the state, it&#8217;s still only a few bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152885</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152885</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And, of course, they project it onto everyone else - if I’m no damn good, then you’re no damn good, either.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I believe this psychological projection is quite telling. Ever wonder why many churches condemn mainstream therapy and offer their own &quot;Christian&quot; counseling? For &lt;em&gt;free&lt;/em&gt;?

(Incidentally, the only reason I&#039;m not getting premarital counseling with my fianc&#233;e is because I live in Tennessee and cheap/free nonreligious premarital counseling just doesn&#039;t exist here. This really pisses me off, too, because the state gives you $50 off your marriage license if you complete counseling.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And, of course, they project it onto everyone else &#8211; if I’m no damn good, then you’re no damn good, either.</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe this psychological projection is quite telling. Ever wonder why many churches condemn mainstream therapy and offer their own &#8220;Christian&#8221; counseling? For <em>free</em>?</p>
<p>(Incidentally, the only reason I&#8217;m not getting premarital counseling with my fianc&eacute;e is because I live in Tennessee and cheap/free nonreligious premarital counseling just doesn&#8217;t exist here. This really pisses me off, too, because the state gives you $50 off your marriage license if you complete counseling.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152863</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fundies think people are no damn good. That’s because they’re using themselves as a reference.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with this, and I think it&#039;s extremely important; it&#039;s the key to understanding them. The history of Christianity has been shaped, largely, by personalities afflicted with pathologically low self-esteem - Augustine, Luther, Calvin, etc. - and it remains a haven for them. Their self-loathing is so profound that the idea that they are born inherently deserving of eternal damnation makes perfect sense to them - to the extent that, when we say we don&#039;t believe it, they insist that we&#039;re denying the obvious; we simply don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;want &lt;/em&gt;to believe it. It&#039;s the only rationalization they have. And, of course, they project it onto everyone else - if &lt;em&gt;I&#039;m&lt;/em&gt; no damn good, then &lt;em&gt;you&#039;re&lt;/em&gt; no damn good, either.

I think there is a kind of &quot;moral imbecility&quot; in evidence. When they ask us, in all sincerity, &quot;If there is no hell, what&#039;s to prevent people from behaving immorally?&quot;, it&#039;s because they fear that, without the threat of damnation, they &lt;em&gt;would &lt;/em&gt;behave immorally. (Of course, this is the point at which a Christian chimes in, &quot;Without God, who defines morality?&quot;)

I&#039;ve heard televangelists say, a number of times, that the single greatest obstacle they encounter in &quot;bringing people to Christ&quot; is their conviction that they are so bad that God could never forgive them. And how many times have we heard fundie ministers say, &quot;In your heart, you &lt;em&gt;know &lt;/em&gt;you&#039;re a sinner.&quot;? I think this is deeply significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fundies think people are no damn good. That’s because they’re using themselves as a reference.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with this, and I think it&#8217;s extremely important; it&#8217;s the key to understanding them. The history of Christianity has been shaped, largely, by personalities afflicted with pathologically low self-esteem &#8211; Augustine, Luther, Calvin, etc. &#8211; and it remains a haven for them. Their self-loathing is so profound that the idea that they are born inherently deserving of eternal damnation makes perfect sense to them &#8211; to the extent that, when we say we don&#8217;t believe it, they insist that we&#8217;re denying the obvious; we simply don&#8217;t <em>want </em>to believe it. It&#8217;s the only rationalization they have. And, of course, they project it onto everyone else &#8211; if <em>I&#8217;m</em> no damn good, then <em>you&#8217;re</em> no damn good, either.</p>
<p>I think there is a kind of &#8220;moral imbecility&#8221; in evidence. When they ask us, in all sincerity, &#8220;If there is no hell, what&#8217;s to prevent people from behaving immorally?&#8221;, it&#8217;s because they fear that, without the threat of damnation, they <em>would </em>behave immorally. (Of course, this is the point at which a Christian chimes in, &#8220;Without God, who defines morality?&#8221;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard televangelists say, a number of times, that the single greatest obstacle they encounter in &#8220;bringing people to Christ&#8221; is their conviction that they are so bad that God could never forgive them. And how many times have we heard fundie ministers say, &#8220;In your heart, you <em>know </em>you&#8217;re a sinner.&#8221;? I think this is deeply significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152857</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/14/no-porn-for-you/#comment-152857</guid>
		<description>maybe it&#039;s a covert op by tom cruise and his followers to take some revenue back for the &quot;real film&quot; sect.

is porn a legitimate form of entertainment; maybe anything is if people are wiling to waste their resources on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe it&#8217;s a covert op by tom cruise and his followers to take some revenue back for the &#8220;real film&#8221; sect.</p>
<p>is porn a legitimate form of entertainment; maybe anything is if people are wiling to waste their resources on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/310 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-13 21:58:45 -->
