Bill Moore’s Unfinished Journey

Ellen Johnson, the president of American Atheists, is on a mission to deliver Bill Moore‘s 45-year-old message that never reached its final destination.

Here’s the story as Ellen tells it:

My name is Ellen Johnson and on April 23, 2008 I am going on a journey to rewrite history and get some justice for the many Freedom Walkers who were prevented from delivering a letter for racial harmony in 1963.

The story began in 1963 with an Atheist named Bill Moore. He was a civil rights activist, author, marine corporal, and graduate from Johns Hopkins University. Bill was a member of CORE, the Congress of Racial Equality and SNCC the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. In 1962 the governor of Mississippi, Ross Barnet refused to allow James Meredith, a black man, to attend the University of Mississippi. It was then that Bill Moore decided to try, in his own small way to bring racial harmony to our nation. He wanted to see his home state of Mississippi do the right thing towards blacks. He decided that he was going to hand deliver a letter to Governor Barnett asking him to reconsider his position on segregation. He was going to carry the letter from Chattanooga, Tennessee to Jackson, Mississippi. It was a freedom walk.

The letter read:

Dear Governor Barnett:

I have always had a warm place in my heart for Mississippi, the land of my childhood and my ancestors. I dislike the reputation this state has acquired as being the most backward and most bigoted in the land. Those who truly love Mississippi must work to change this image.

Frankly, I do not know which is worse — to be raised to believe that one should be happy to live in poverty and die twice as fast as the white man and to be told to reject the ideas of those who tell you democracy means the right to vote whatever the color of one’s skin; or is it worse to be raised as members of a sort of ‘master race’ which fights a losing battle to preserve injustice with barbaric laws and police state methods.

The British were wise in that they dissolved their empire before they were forced to do so. Consequently, the governments of countries such as India and Nigeria are stable and friendly and democratic. The French, on the other hand, held onto their empire as long as they could. Thus the bitter strife in Laos, Vietnam, Algeria.

The end of Mississippi colonialism is fast approaching. The only question is whether you will help it to end in a friendship like the British, or try to hold onto what is already lost, creating bitterness and hatred, as did the French. For our sake, as well as the Negro’s, I hope you will decide to try the British way.

The white man cannot be truly free himself until all men have their rights. Each is dependent upon the other. Do not go down in infamy as one who fought democracy for all, which you have not the power to prevent.

Be gracious. Give more than is immediately demanded of you. Make certain that when the Negro gets his rights and his vote that he does not in the process learn to treat the white man with the contempt and disdain that, unfortunately, some of us now treat him.

Sincerely,

William L. Moore

Bill Moore used his two-week vacation from his job as a postal worker in Baltimore, Maryland and began his walk. He planned to walk 40 miles a day for ten days.

He made a sandwich board sign for the walk — in the home of Madalyn O’Hair, who he supported in her Supreme Court case in 1963 called Murray v. Curlett. The front of the sign read: End Segregation In America. Eat At Joe’s — Both Black and White. The back read: Equal Rights For All (Mississippi or Bust)

Bill began his walk from Chattanooga, Tennessee on April 21, 1963.

Along the way, he was greeted by both friend and foe. Two days later on April 23, a motorist found Moore’s body. He had been shot twice in the head at close range with a .22 caliber rifle. The gun’s ownership was traced to Floyd Simpson, whom Moore had argued with earlier that day. Simpson was never indicted. Bill Moore was murdered because of his Atheism and his politics.

A week later ten more Freedom Walkers, both black and white, attempted to finish Bill’s walk. They never made it. They were stopped at the border of Alabama and they were beaten and jailed. They languished in jail for months. They were sentenced to death and fed muffins with crushed glass inside.

Four other attempts, involving hundreds of people were made and all were thwarted by the segregationists in Alabama and Mississippi. On August 3, 1963, the fifth and final attempt was made to complete Bill Moore’s walk from Gadsden, Alabama. Six hundred and eighty-two people were arrested attempting to finish the walk of a man they never even knew.

Forty-five years later it is time to deliver that letter.

Bill Moore did not die in vain. The Freedom Walkers (Sam Shirah, Winston Lockett, Bill Haley, Zev Aelony, Chico Neblett, Bill Hansen, Bob Zellner, Eric Weinberger and Robert Gore to name few) attempts to deliver the letter and their subsequent punishments must not have been in vain.

On April 23 I will be in Attalla, Alabama where Bill Moore was murdered and I’m going to finish his walk and deliver his letter to the governor of Mississippi. Then the history books will show that the Freedom Walkers were not defeated and that the letter was delivered. It may have been delivered 45 years later, but it was delivered.

She’s walking approximately 22 miles a day with her group, which includes Ken Loukinen (president of the Atheists of Broward County). The Mississippi governor’s office is expecting her.

May 7th is the tentative end date for the trip.

You can check out the daily updates here.

Can you help?

If you live along the route, then wait for the walkers and give them some moral support! You can even walk a mile or two with them, or arrange transportation and walk the entire day with them (Freedom Walkers cannot bring you back to your car because of the time limitations they have – walkers that join them are responsible for their own transportation). If you see them, you can make a cash donation to help pay for water, food, lodging, and gas for the chase car during the trip. If you cannot get to the Freedom Walkers on the road but would like to make a donation, please contact Blair Scott for details.

Spread the word about the Freedom Walk! Let people know what is going on and the progress the walkers are making. Tell others about the story of Bill Moore. Talk about civil rights and equality for all and live the concept.

Just a little over a week to go…

(Thanks to Rose for the link!)


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Bye Bye, Neumanns?

Remember the parents who refused to give their 11-year-old daughter the medical attention she needed for her ketoacidosis? Instead they opted to pray for her healing? Then she died?

There is now a bit of potential retribution:

Marathon County District Attorney Jill Falstad announced at 1 p.m. at a press conference in Weston that Dale and Leilani Neumann each will be charged with second-degree reckless homicide, a charge that carries a punishment of up to 25 years in prison.

Hallelujah.

This guy is in support of the parents.

He scares the bejesus out of me.

While it is true that God created the world and all that is in it, including doctors, we must note: Jesus never sent anyone to a doctor or a hospital. Jesus offered healing by one means only! Healing was by faith. Yes, God created doctors but only to give man a choice between man’s ways — the doctor — or His way — faith! When we don’t have faith we need the doctor and it’s obvious that most want-to-be Christians need the doctors because they have no faith in God; their faith is in man. God created good and evil. Witchcraft can heal also. Should Christians also seek witches?

When the mark of the beast comes and you don’t take that chip in your hand and forehead you will not be able to pay for meds or doctors; then you will be deemed negligent and your children will be taken away.

The guy does make one good point, though:

Wisconsin law, Section 948.04 (6) states: “A person is NOT guilty of an offense under this section solely because he or she provides a child with treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone for healing…”

As far as I can tell, that law (PDF) is still in the books.

So is the law that says this regarding types of abuses (PDF):

EXCEPTION. Nothing in this section may be construed to mean that an individual at risk is abused solely because he or she consistently relies upon treatment by spiritual means through prayer for healing, in lieu of medical care, in accordance with his or her religious tradition.

So how can those laws be reconciled with the charges against the family?

The answer lies in the fact that the charges are for homicide, not neglect or abuse.

Here’s Falstad once more:

“Second-degree reckless homicide has two elements. The first element is that the defendant caused the death of another. The second element is that the defendant caused the death by criminally reckless conduct.”

“In this case that (criminally reckless) conduct was the failure to seek medical intervention. The failure to seek medical intervention created an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm to Kara and the Neumanns were aware of that risk.”

Because there was a death involved, Falstad said she had to consider homicide charges rather than neglect charges.

Medical science isn’t perfect. But it’s the best option we have. It certainly has better odds than prayer, which wouldn’t have helped the family’s daughter with her condition.

(via Dallas Morning News)


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Scientists Are Murderers

Ben Dreidel sat through a Ben Stein interview on the Trinity Broadcasting Network so you don’t have to.

(If you’re curious, go here, click on the “Behind the Scenes” tab, and go to the video for April 21th.)

It’s amazing how many shock-inducing things Stein says to host Paul Crouch, Jr. regarding the theory of evolution and science in general when he doesn’t think non-Christians are watching.

A few excerpts (courtesy of Ben D.) are below.

Look at the last ones, especially:

Ben Stein: … I also started reading more about a subject that had long interested me, the connection of Darwinism with Nazism, and the fact that Nazism had rested in large part on the idea of Darwinism, that there are superior and inferior races, and that the superior ones deserve to live and they should stamp out the inferior ones…

Crouch: What can people of faith do? What do you hope comes from this film?

Stein: Well, we hope that people who have children in schools will tell their children that if the teacher says Darwinism created everything and that there is no explanation for anything in the scientific world except Darwinism, that the student will say, well, Ms. Smith — or whatever the teacher’s name is — how did life begin? What keeps the planets in their orbits? Is there any proof of a separate species ever being seen to evolve?

Stein: We’re saying teach what is… what the evidence takes you to. I mean, the evidence does not take you to Darwinism about, uh, about, uh, as to the foundations of life. Darwin just had nothing to say about that. The evidence doesn’t take you to Darwinism about astronomy or about the laws of physics or of thermodynamics.

Stein: When we just saw that man, I think it was Mr. [PZ] Myers, talking about how great scientists were, I was thinking to myself the last time any of my relatives saw scientists telling them what to do they were telling them to go to the showers to get gassed.

Stein (speaking about the Holocaust): …that was horrifying beyond words, and that’s where science — in my opinion, this is just an opinion — that’s where science leads you.

Crouch: That’s right.

Stein: … Love of God and compassion and empathy leads you to a very glorious place, and science leads you to killing people.

Crouch: Good word, good word.

You’ve got to be *%&^ing kidding me.

[tags]atheist, atheism, PZ Myers, Expelled[/tags]

Who Do You Know?

Random question of the day:

Who is the most famous person you know (who would admit to knowing you back)?



[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Christian Magazine… for Doubters

I’m not sure how many readers would submit an article to this magazine, but unlike other Christian publications, it’s willing to be honest about faith and God — in the sense that they’ll publish stories about doubt and struggles with Christianity.

You don’t see very much of that in other Christian magazines unless it comes with a happy ending (i.e. The person gets “saved” at the end).

That doesn’t have to happen here.

What type of submissions will Relief accept?

In terms of scope, the door is wide open, but still has some boundary. A decent yardstick is the Bible. Not the churchized version, but the real, gritty scripture: Noah drank too much; Moses committed murder; David committed adultery, then tried to put his life back together; David’s daughter was horribly raped; poets expressed real doubt and exhilarating praise in the Psalms; Solomon spoke beautifully and unapologetically about sex; Jesus made fun of religious leaders, faced betrayal by a friend but still spoke highly of friendship, stared death down; Paul and Peter argued about race…

Christian authors need not only write expressly about God, faith, and church. When Christ says “I send you out as a sheep among wolves,” he doesn’t say that we should shut our eyes and pretend they do not exist. Relief is not opposed to stories about Christ or faith, and it is also not opposed to stories about raw, gritty, beautiful life. We are looking for pieces that push the envelope; however, work that is gratuitously obscene or that has a message in clear contradiction with scripture will not be considered.

Don’t get too thrown off by that last line.

One atheist has already been published:

… Chet, and his lovely wife Heather, who is also an editor for the magazine, convinced us to at least submit. They told us that they were not that kind of Christian magazine. That they were a Christian magazine that was interested in doubt and blasphemy and loss of faith. I looked them square in the eyes and said, but are you interested in publishing atheists? Absolutely, they both agreed.

I have to applaud Chet and Heather and the other people working on Relief. They are not like me: they are believers, and their belief is not something simple they keep in their pockets and pull out on Sundays — it’s essential to their lives. And while I do not believe in that, I respect that. But even more, I respect the artistic, intellectual, and spiritual openness with with they are running their magazine. I think it is very easy to fall into a closed system, dig the echoes in the chamber, and snuggle up in the warmth of that smugness. There are a lot of Christians in this world who give Christians a bad name — who are making “Christian” the “new C word.” But Chet and Heather and the people of Relief are not among them.

It might be of interest to a few of you with Christian backgrounds :)


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Carnival of the Godless #90

The new Carnival of the Godless is at No More Mr. Nice Guy!. Go check it out!

The next CotG is at State of Protest in two weeks.

Submit your entries here!


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Why Do Humans Practice Religion?

According to anthropologist Maurice Bloch of the London School of Economics: “Humans alone practice religion because they’re the only creatures to have evolved imagination.”

This is difference from the popular argument that religion evolved to promote social bonding.

… he argues that first, we had to evolve the necessary brain architecture to imagine things and beings that don’t physically exist, and the possibility that people somehow live on after they’ve died.

Once we’d done that, we had access to a form of social interaction unavailable to any other creatures on the planet. Uniquely, humans could use what Bloch calls the “transcendental social” to unify with groups, such as nations and clans, or even with imaginary groups such as the dead. The transcendental social also allows humans to follow the idealised codes of conduct associated with religion.

Modern-day religions still embrace this idea of communities bound with the living and the dead, such as the Christian notion of followers being “one body with Christ”, or the Islamic “Ummah” uniting Muslims.

Bloch’s paper appears in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, an abstract of which can be found here.

(Thanks to Lexi for the link!)


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

He’ll Win It In Regulation

Yep. The cartoon by RJ Matson in the St. Louis Post Dispatch just about says it all:

obamacartoon.gif



[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

In Case You Want to Make Good with the Lord

If you still don’t feel comfortable after reserving your spot in Heaven, there’s another way to save your soul.

You can still pay indulgences to the Catholic Church!

I have committed a

sin…


I seek

absolution.


I am purchasing an indulgence for

.

After filling out the checklist o’ sins, turns out I owe the Pope a small fortune. Which I won’t be able to pay.

I am *so* going to Hell now.

(Thanks to Jeff for the link!)


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Matthew LaClair’s Op-Ed in the LA Times

Matthew LaClair is the high school student who made headlines when he recorded his (public) high school history teacher preaching fundamental Christianity in class.

He was last seen leading the charge to get a mistake-riddled, conservatively-biased Government textbook corrected or purged from the school systems.

He has an Op-Ed piece in today’s LA Times about his goal.

In one of my classes, we use the 10th edition of “American Government” by James Q. Wilson, a well-known conservative academic, and John J. DiIulio, a political scientist and former head of President Bush’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. (2005). The text contains a statement, repeated three times, that students may not pray in public schools. In this edition of the text, the authors drive the point home with a photograph of students holding hands and praying outside a school. The caption reads: “The Supreme Court will not let this happen inside a public school.”

I knew this was false. In fact, students are allowed to pray in schools; courts have ruled many times that a student’s right to pray may not be abridged. What’s generally impermissible is state-sponsored prayer, in which school officials lead prayer or students are called on or required to pray. It seemed clear to me that the purpose of the discussion in the textbook was to indoctrinate, not to educate.

Matthew elaborates on several other mistakes as well:

The authors neglect to mention the growing scientific consensus on this subject. They dismiss those who are concerned about global warming — that is, the overwhelming majority of scientists — as “activists” motivated not by data but by “entrepreneurial politics.” Those who deny or downplay it are described as “skeptical scientists.”

Pointing out dissent within the scientific community is appropriate. Suggesting that the majority, but not the minority, is politically motivated is not appropriate. If a controversy truly exists, then the authors should not instruct students which side to “support.”

The Center for Inquiry even drafted a detailed report (PDF) listing the relevant parts of the book — the incorrect or biased passages that are seen all too often.

Matthew closes the piece with this:

As Americans, we should stand up for our common values. We should champion education and settle for nothing less than the best. Our teachers should do the same and should not misuse their positions to promote their personal agendas.

Well said.

Not coincidentally, one of the textbook’s authors, James Q. Wilson, also has an opinion piece in today’s Times.

Right out of the gate, he’s on the defensive:

Of course some textbooks are politically biased. It is not hard to understand why. Opinion surveys and studies of campaign contributions show that the great majority of academic social scientists are liberals, so no one should be astonished to learn that some liberals write left-leaning textbooks and that some of them assign them to their classes.

When he uses language like that, it’s hard to believe he’s going to be politically neutral on anything…

Let’s look at his arguments (emphasis mine):

But of late there has been a sudden flurry of charges that our book has a deep conservative bias. The Center for Inquiry, a nonprofit organization devoted to “secularism and planetary ethics,” published a lengthy complaint saying that we had said the country was founded on a belief in “original sin” and that the text misinterprets the Supreme Court’s rulings on school prayer. Two letters from space scientists say we give too little support to the idea of global warming.

And a New Jersey student, known for his activism in promoting 1st Amendment rights, says that a caption in the book, accompanying a photo of students praying outside a public school, falsely suggests that no student may ever pray inside a school building. And he complains that we unfairly called scientists who believe in global warming “activists.”

“Falsely suggests”? The picture shows kids praying outside of school. The caption reads: “The Supreme Court will not let this happen inside a public school.” Nothing false about that.

Original sin? The authors did say the colonists believed in it and founded the country on that principle. They write:

“To the colonists all of mankind suffered from original sin, symbolized by Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Since no one was born innocent, no one could be trusted with power. Thus the Constitution had to be designed in such a way as to curb the darker side of human nature. Otherwise everyone’s rights would be in jeopardy.”

Of course, that’s historically inaccurate. Some believed it. Not everyone. As CFI mentions, there’s no evidence that “original sin” played any role in the drafting of our Consitution.

But apparently, everyone just read the wrong edition of the book.

Wilson’s entire argument seems to be that CFI and Matthew were picking apart the 10th edition of the book, which came out in 2005/2006.

Had they all just read the 11th edition, they would’ve seen all was fair and balanced!

As for school prayer, we made it perfectly clear in our book that what has been banned by the Supreme Court is state-sponsored prayer. It’s true that a sloppily written photo caption was taken out of the 11th edition — as our critics would have seen if they had looked at the most recent version of the book (which was in print long before they complained).

“Long before”? The 11th edition was published November 30th, 2007. About five months ago. The actual copyright date is 2008. Obviously not enough time for school districts to get the new versions.

The space scientists think that we were too critical of the global warming argument. In the 10th edition of the book, which they read, we wrote that there was disagreement among scientists about this matter. In the 11th edition, which they did not read, we said that the disagreement was much less, though it still exists. What happened between the 10th and 11th editions? Among other things, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a new report in which the evidence for greenhouse gases affecting Earth’s temperature was stronger…

That evidence was available long before the IPCC’s report came out.

“Disagreement”? Hardly. Scientists knew about the evidence for man-made global warming en masse. Hell, Al Gore‘s movie An Inconvenient Truth came out in 2006 and that was well after the scientists were already in consensus on the issue.

CFI’s report even states:

… the U.S. National Academy of Sciences… issued a joint statement in 2005 with 10 other National Academies of Science declaring that “the scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action. It is vital that all nations identify cost-effective steps that they can take now, to contribute to substantial and long-term reduction in net global greenhouse gas emissions.”

And no word on whether the “activist” label was removed in the new edition, either.

The Committee for Inquiry ignored the book and cherry-picked sentences.

Well, CFI has quite a few sentences… and several very long passages. They looked at the 10th edition in depth. And it hardly seems fair for the author to discredit that version of the book in lieu of a newer one most students have never seen and chalk all the major mistakes up to outdated information, when current information was present for many years prior.

If anyone who reads this article believes the text is biased, they should write to me. If they think it is not biased, they should write the Center for Inquiry.

Looks like Wilson’s going to be receiving a lot of letters… or phone calls.


[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]