<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Questions Do You Have for the Candidates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/10/what-questions-do-you-have-for-the-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/10/what-questions-do-you-have-for-the-candidates/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/10/what-questions-do-you-have-for-the-candidates/#comment-233468</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5064#comment-233468</guid>
		<description>um... while I agree with her values, I don&#039;t think they are what we need to be claiming as secular values.  I think secular values means things like protection of those who can&#039;t protect themselves:  the poor, children, etc.  It should be preservation of individual rights and freedoms, protection of families, economic stability, ethical foreign policy.  I thought the point was to take back the term &quot;values voter&quot; by pointing out that these are secular values not religious values.  Instead it sounds like these are anti-religion values and says &quot;our values are different from your values&quot; which really seems a cut me own throat strategy.

Plus could they not get a woman who could hold her head and face still for 2 seconds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um&#8230; while I agree with her values, I don&#8217;t think they are what we need to be claiming as secular values.  I think secular values means things like protection of those who can&#8217;t protect themselves:  the poor, children, etc.  It should be preservation of individual rights and freedoms, protection of families, economic stability, ethical foreign policy.  I thought the point was to take back the term &#8220;values voter&#8221; by pointing out that these are secular values not religious values.  Instead it sounds like these are anti-religion values and says &#8220;our values are different from your values&#8221; which really seems a cut me own throat strategy.</p>
<p>Plus could they not get a woman who could hold her head and face still for 2 seconds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 175/183 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 13:23:03 -->
