<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Say No to Polytheism&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 02:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: micketymoc</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-240139</link>
		<dc:creator>micketymoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-240139</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the correction, it puts your previous comment in perspective.

I&#039;d just like to add that, notwithstanding &quot;divine nature&quot; as defined by the Catholic Church, we&#039;re still talking about the practice of praying to multiple invisible beings - the Catholic stand simply divests executive authority from all other invisible beings save one.

Me, I prefer to simplify it all and pray to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8evsSNdXcs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe Pesci&lt;/a&gt;. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the correction, it puts your previous comment in perspective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just like to add that, notwithstanding &#8220;divine nature&#8221; as defined by the Catholic Church, we&#8217;re still talking about the practice of praying to multiple invisible beings &#8211; the Catholic stand simply divests executive authority from all other invisible beings save one.</p>
<p>Me, I prefer to simplify it all and pray to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8evsSNdXcs" rel="nofollow">Joe Pesci</a>. <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Terry Donahue, CC</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-240134</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Terry Donahue, CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-240134</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;citing how Matthew or other historical texts brings up angels and Marian devotion misses the point of the cartoon.&lt;/em&gt;

I wasn&#039;t addressing the cartoon. I was responding to two comments above:

1) Asylum Seeker&#039;s question: &quot;are guardian angels an actual part of Christian theology, or is that just more random, extra-Biblical schmultz&quot;

2) pseudonymn&#039;s claim that: &quot;the idea [of guardian angels] only goes back to the 400’s CE.&quot;

&lt;em&gt;You’re still promoting the idea of multiple divine agents&lt;/em&gt;

If by multiple divine agents you mean multiple human and angelic beings that act as agents for one divine being, then yes, I do promote that.

If you mean multiple beings that have a divine nature, then no, I don&#039;t promote that.

If it bugs or amuses anyone, I&#039;m fine with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>citing how Matthew or other historical texts brings up angels and Marian devotion misses the point of the cartoon.</em></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t addressing the cartoon. I was responding to two comments above:</p>
<p>1) Asylum Seeker&#8217;s question: &#8220;are guardian angels an actual part of Christian theology, or is that just more random, extra-Biblical schmultz&#8221;</p>
<p>2) pseudonymn&#8217;s claim that: &#8220;the idea [of guardian angels] only goes back to the 400’s CE.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>You’re still promoting the idea of multiple divine agents</em></p>
<p>If by multiple divine agents you mean multiple human and angelic beings that act as agents for one divine being, then yes, I do promote that.</p>
<p>If you mean multiple beings that have a divine nature, then no, I don&#8217;t promote that.</p>
<p>If it bugs or amuses anyone, I&#8217;m fine with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micketymoc</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239587</link>
		<dc:creator>micketymoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239587</guid>
		<description>Father Terry, citing how Matthew or other historical texts brings up angels and Marian devotion misses the point of the cartoon. 

Praying to Mary or one&#039;s guardian angel is, to many non-Catholics, practically indistinguishable from polytheism. 

It&#039;s a neat trick that Catholics do, parsing prayer to &lt;i&gt;God&lt;/i&gt; and prayer to &lt;i&gt;intercessors&lt;/i&gt;, but it&#039;s still disingenuous - you&#039;re still promoting the idea of &lt;i&gt;multiple divine agents&lt;/i&gt;, which bugs Protestants and simply amuses atheists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Father Terry, citing how Matthew or other historical texts brings up angels and Marian devotion misses the point of the cartoon. </p>
<p>Praying to Mary or one&#8217;s guardian angel is, to many non-Catholics, practically indistinguishable from polytheism. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a neat trick that Catholics do, parsing prayer to <i>God</i> and prayer to <i>intercessors</i>, but it&#8217;s still disingenuous &#8211; you&#8217;re still promoting the idea of <i>multiple divine agents</i>, which bugs Protestants and simply amuses atheists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Terry Donahue, CC</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239552</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Terry Donahue, CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239552</guid>
		<description>Actually the idea of guardian angels goes back to the following words of Jesus:

&quot;See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their angels in heaven always look upon the face of my heavenly Father.&quot; (Matthew 18:10)

Furthermore, Christians addressed the following prayer to Mary at least as early as 250 AD:

Beneath your compassion, 
We take refuge, O Mother of God: 
do not despise our petitions
in time of trouble: 
but rescue us from dangers, 
only pure, only blessed one.

“The hymn Sub Tuum Praesidium was first found in Greek in the Coptic Orthodox Christmas Liturgy of the third century and dates approximately to 250 AD. It is used to this day in the Greek liturgical tradition. Versions of this prayer also occur in the Ambrosian rite, Roman, and Byzantine and Coptic liturgies of today and in numerous languages.”  (Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_tuum_praesidium)

Such prayers are acts of honoring and requests for saints to pray for us. They are not acts of adoration/worship, which is due to God alone. Thus they are not acts of idolatry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the idea of guardian angels goes back to the following words of Jesus:</p>
<p>&#8220;See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their angels in heaven always look upon the face of my heavenly Father.&#8221; (Matthew 18:10)</p>
<p>Furthermore, Christians addressed the following prayer to Mary at least as early as 250 AD:</p>
<p>Beneath your compassion,<br />
We take refuge, O Mother of God:<br />
do not despise our petitions<br />
in time of trouble:<br />
but rescue us from dangers,<br />
only pure, only blessed one.</p>
<p>“The hymn Sub Tuum Praesidium was first found in Greek in the Coptic Orthodox Christmas Liturgy of the third century and dates approximately to 250 AD. It is used to this day in the Greek liturgical tradition. Versions of this prayer also occur in the Ambrosian rite, Roman, and Byzantine and Coptic liturgies of today and in numerous languages.”  (Wikipedia, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_tuum_praesidium" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_tuum_praesidium</a>)</p>
<p>Such prayers are acts of honoring and requests for saints to pray for us. They are not acts of adoration/worship, which is due to God alone. Thus they are not acts of idolatry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239548</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239548</guid>
		<description>Indeed, you should reject polytheism...
in favor of &lt;strong&gt;Pollytheism&lt;/strong&gt;. Now accepting sacrificial gifts through Paypal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, you should reject polytheism&#8230;<br />
in favor of <strong>Pollytheism</strong>. Now accepting sacrificial gifts through Paypal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239527</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239527</guid>
		<description>heh, for all the years I spent in various churches, the trinity was one concept I never could fully wrap my head around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, for all the years I spent in various churches, the trinity was one concept I never could fully wrap my head around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYCatheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239436</link>
		<dc:creator>NYCatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239436</guid>
		<description>Becksi, that is awesome. Did you come up with it? If so, good work! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becksi, that is awesome. Did you come up with it? If so, good work! <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahH</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239380</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239380</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know many of the evangelical Protestants I&#039;m related to (or know through my family&#039;s church) worry that Catholics aren&#039;t really saved because of the &quot;idolatry&quot; involved with praying to saints, holding the virgin Mary up to a semi-deity position, etc.

From a purely entertainment-oriented perspective, I think more gods = more interesting.  The Greek/Roman gods, the Hindu gods, the Norse gods - they all make for much more entertaining reading than Allah and Yaweh and Jesus.  Lightning and sex and adventures and tricksters &gt; deserts and diseases and preaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know many of the evangelical Protestants I&#8217;m related to (or know through my family&#8217;s church) worry that Catholics aren&#8217;t really saved because of the &#8220;idolatry&#8221; involved with praying to saints, holding the virgin Mary up to a semi-deity position, etc.</p>
<p>From a purely entertainment-oriented perspective, I think more gods = more interesting.  The Greek/Roman gods, the Hindu gods, the Norse gods &#8211; they all make for much more entertaining reading than Allah and Yaweh and Jesus.  Lightning and sex and adventures and tricksters &gt; deserts and diseases and preaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asylum Seeker</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239174</link>
		<dc:creator>Asylum Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239174</guid>
		<description>Damn my need for excessive amounts of sleep!  Thank you for the information, Pseudonym.  I assumed that it, if it was a Christian concept at all, it was a strictly Catholic concept.  I guess polytheism was a hard habit to break...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn my need for excessive amounts of sleep!  Thank you for the information, Pseudonym.  I assumed that it, if it was a Christian concept at all, it was a strictly Catholic concept.  I guess polytheism was a hard habit to break&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becksi</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2008/10/20/just-say-no-to-polytheism/#comment-239158</link>
		<dc:creator>Becksi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=5245#comment-239158</guid>
		<description>Belief in 0, 1 or 3 gods is completely irrational and wicked. The CORRECT number of gods is actually 1.99999... And this argument proves it:

1. Greater numbers are greater than lesser numbers.
2. God&#039;s greattness requires that the amount of God He is must be as great as possible.
3. God cannot be &gt;= 200% God because then there would be two or more gods.
4. Therefore the amount of Gods is infinitely close to 200% and the number of gods is 1.9999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belief in 0, 1 or 3 gods is completely irrational and wicked. The CORRECT number of gods is actually 1.99999&#8230; And this argument proves it:</p>
<p>1. Greater numbers are greater than lesser numbers.<br />
2. God&#8217;s greattness requires that the amount of God He is must be as great as possible.<br />
3. God cannot be &gt;= 200% God because then there would be two or more gods.<br />
4. Therefore the amount of Gods is infinitely close to 200% and the number of gods is 1.9999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 387/391 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-27 21:36:33 -->
