Can You Stop the Pro-Christian Messages from Afar?

Reader Kaitie is facing a bit of a dilemma. Her boyfriend (a senior in high school) attends a public school where possible pro-Christian videos are being played for students. He’s not about to stir the pot over it and Kaitie is wondering if there’s anything she can do about it even though she’s no longer attending the school (and if so, what):

I am a freshman in college and I attended a high school in a very small, rural town in bible belt Missouri. My boyfriend is still going to school there and has informed me of something very disturbing. The school has an educational time every Tuesday and Thursday called LEAD time in which students are taught lessons by senior and junior mentors and sometimes shown videos with life lessons and such.

This week a video was shown with an obvious religious bias. It showed two kids skydiving along to Christian rock music in the intro, I guess to make them seem rebellious and interesting, and then showed the two having a conversation. They talked about morals (sexual promiscuity, lying, cheating, etc) and although the boyfriend said they never actually “brought it back to Jesus,” it was very obviously implied, as if the Christian music at the beginning wasn’t obvious enough!

I was outraged and he didn’t seem to understand why I was so surprised. “You’ve been away from [the school] too long” he said, because really, I shouldn’t be surprised that something like that was shown at that school. The thing is, last year things like that weren’t shown, but I do remember an incident in which a video about violence against homosexuals was shown and several students complained. “Edgy” videos were never shown during LEAD time again.

I told the boyfriend that he should complain about this video just like the Christians complained about the last one, but he wasn’t exactly sure how to go about it. He is more of a skeptic than an atheist, but his parents are churchgoers so he can’t go the common “parents complain to the administration” route. He isn’t nearly as “activist” as I am when it comes to his disbelief and I doubt he wants attention drawn to him for being anti-religion at that school, especially because I was known for being outspoken about my atheism when I went there and we think people might think he is just following me or that I converted him or something.

While I would really like to see him step up to the plate on this one, I doubt he will do anything. He says that if another video similar to this one is shown (it’s part of a series) that has religious undertones, he will maybe say something. My question is: is there anything I can do to complain if I don’t go to school there anymore? I would like to help my boyfriend find some more nonbelievers at the school so he doesn’t have to go it alone, because I know they exist, but they’re hard to find. Any advice for me or the boyfriend?

Do you know of any other time when students have fought something like this in a public school?

This was part of the message I sent back to Kaitie:

My own thinking: There’s not much you can do from a distance. Someone inside the school has to take action. If you attended the high school, perhaps there’s a teacher you’re close to that you could contact about this? (Preferably a tenured one.) A teacher might be able to put a stop to it without much legal action. Without any hard evidence that there is a pro-Christian message being displayed, it might be tough to do anything, though. The music itself isn’t a smoking gun (unless there are several mentions of Jesus per song).

Does anyone else have better advice?

Elizabeth Dole’s Atheism Slander Against Kay Hagan

I stay away from the blog for a day and all hell breaks loose on the Elizabeth Dole/Kay Hagan front. Thanks to everyone who sent me emails about it.

To recap:

Dole has been accusing her North Carolina Senate seat opponent (Democrat Kay Hagan) of palling around with atheists. Hagan really did nothing of the sort. She attended a fundraiser thrown by people who happened to be atheists but the fundraiser had nothing to do with that. Dole’s just desperate and she thinks that by accusing Hagan of being an atheist (which she is not), she will somehow overtake her on Election Day.

As Alex Castellanos said today on CNN, “When you’re making ads that say ‘there is no God,’ it usually means your campaign doesn’t have much of a prayer.”

Today’s update:

Dole is now running this inflammatory ad in North Carolina:

It shows edited clips from American Atheists spokespeople (former President) Ellen Johnson and (current Communications Director) David Silverman. They speak about their beliefs and the video implies that Hagan shares those beliefs.

She does not. In fact, those comments had nothing to do with Hagan or her campaign. They’re completely unrelated remarks.

At the very end, a voice declare “There is no God!” A casual listener may think that voice is Hagan’s.

It is not.

The ad also shows Hagan attending a fundraiser thrown by atheists. The image you see, though, is not that fundraiser. It’s a doctored image. (Do you really think someone would videotape that event? And that it would become available to the Dole campaign? Even if it was real, is that the most shocking footage they could find?)

It’s all fake, just designed to scare voters.

(And did anyone else know that “godless money” exists?! I thought they phased all that out in the 1950s…)

As Seth Colter Walls writes about Hagan at The Huffington Post:

In fact, the Democratic candidate is a Sunday School teacher and an elder at her Presbyterian church.

The ad also asks “What Did Hagan Promise in Return?” to atheists who donated money to her campaign.

Lots of people on this site have given money to Hagan (motivated by Dole’s own negative campaigning). To my knowledge, no one from the Hagan campaign has contacted any of us to ask what we want.

If they did, the response would be simple: We want civility, responsibility, and honor restored to the government — things that Elizabeth Dole cannot give us.

Guess what?

Hagan has African-American supporters, too. Some of them gave her money. Some may have even held fundraisers for her.

That doesn’t make her black.

(It’s still not too late to donate to Hagan’s campaign, by the way.)

In response to the false advertising, Hagan has done a number of things:

1) She is headed to court to get a cease-and-desist order on the ad.

2) Her campaign has put out two more ads in her favor.

3) She held a press conference with the following remarks:

Thank you for coming today. I know this was called at short notice, and I appreciate you being here for this.

Let’s get right to it. Elizabeth Dole should absolutely be ashamed of herself.

I don’t know what things were like when she grew up in North Carolina, but the North Carolina I was raised in would NEVER condone this kind of personal slander.

I can’t begin to tell you how upset I am that she has attacked my Christian faith.

She’s been in Washington for too long, gotten too close to George Bush and the special interests and this is what she’s become.

I am appalled at these tactics. This is politics of the worst kind, and it’s been rejected by North Carolinians at every level. This is so unbecoming of the woman she claims to be.

I have taught Sunday school. I’m an elder in this church, where the Hagan family has attended for over 100 years. I go on mission trips. I was raised going to Sunday school and church every week. And I raised my children that way.

On Christmas Eve, we attend the 11:00 evening service, then early on Christmas mornings, my children and husband and I go to the Bell House and cook breakfast for the residents there. My family, my community and my church are the anchors of my life.

If Senator Dole wants to pass judgment on my faith, that’s her right — but it’s not what my faith teaches.

This is a fabricated, pathetic ad.

I am outraged… That is not my voice at the end of the ad, and I do not share their beliefs.

This was an event with nearly 40 hosts, including an ambassador and a sitting U.S. Senator (John Kerry).

We have already contacted our lawyers and are proceeding with a cease and desist order sent to Elizabeth Dole.

This kind of politics should not be tolerated.

The politics of George Bush won’t create one new job, lower the cost of health care, or do one lick of good for North Carolina.

At their core, Americans aren’t Democrat or Republican, red or blue – they’re Americans, plain and simple. We ALL love our country, and we all value the role of faith in American life.

Shame on anyone who says differently.

Congress just had to bailout Wall Street, workers’ retirement savings are out the window, people are genuinely concerned about keeping their job in this tough economic climate, and Elizabeth Dole is trying to talk about ANYTHING but the issues.

This attack speaks volumes about her personally and politically, but more importantly, it speaks to the lack of leadership she’s shown on behalf of North Carolinians. At this critical point in American history, why isn’t Elizabeth Dole talking about what she’s done for North Carolinians and what she’s planning to do if re-elected?

This is exactly why people in North Carolina are supporting me – I have real, concrete proposals to help fix what’s broken in Washington and advocate on behalf of working families. I’ve been talking about the issues and ensuring North Carolinians know what real leadership looks like.

Elizabeth Dole is just relying on the same old, tired rhetoric that divides people instead of bringing them together, and that’s the last thing people in North Carolina want right now.

Well, not all atheists “value the role of faith in American life.” Shame on Kay Hagan for saying that.

But even if you don’t follow politics, why should you care about this story?

Elizabeth Dole is attacking her opponent by saying she associates with people like you. To Dole, you are unworthy of having a voice in the government — or even supporting someone who may have that voice on your behalf.

It’s despicable and Dole needs to be stopped. She needs to be voted out of any position of power.

Back to Hagan. A news report said Hagan was “calling the spot a slanderous and pathetic attempt to maintain political power.” She later called the ad despicable.

Let’s be clear about this: It’s not slanderous or pathetic to be an atheist.

Hagan’s just saying it’s slanderous and pathetic to lie about your opponent in order to win an election.

I’m not happy with her choice of words. She could have used the opportunity to say that, while atheists make up a vital segment of this country, she is a woman of faith. In the heat of the moment and the political stress she must be under, though, I can understand why she said what she did.

Right now, most atheist organizations have not commented on the situation.

It may be better to wait until after the elections to raise a fuss about everything that has taken place. Both candidates (but especially Dole) could stand to learn a lesson about what atheists have to offer.

On another note, all these ads mention that one of the fundraising hosts was an advisor to the Godless Americans Political Action Committee. Does GAMPAC even do anything anymore? Not to my knowledge. If you look at their website, the most recent picture on their home page is from over a year ago. To say that any fundraiser was held on behalf of that organization is a lie. That organization is almost entirely non-existent.

A Personal Story About Proposition 8

Frequent commenter Larry shared this story with me via email and I felt it should really be passed along. If you get a chance to read the whole thing, you can see some of the core problems with people who are against gay marriage. It has much less to do with their faith than they think. It’s more about ignorance and fear of the unknown:

We live in Simi Valley, CA… and are paying very close attention to Proposition 8 out here. Prop 8 is forwarded by religious groups and it seeks to place a ban on gay marriage in California, where it is currently legal.

I am married and have 4 kids… one of whom is serving in the Navy now (yes, he is an atheist in a foxhole, so to speak). My kids living at home are 15,16 and 18. Just fyi to set this up.

So this weekend, my wife and all three of my kids had decided to make signs against Prop 8 and go stand on the corner of a busy intersection where a lot of demonstrating, both pro and con, has been taking place. My youngest is 15… and he is very well aware of the proposition. He understands what it is about and on his own can express reasons why he is against it, as can my older children. You see, their grandmother, my mother-in-law, is a lesbian and has lived with a woman since before they were born. Even back when I was a fundy, I had a different view of homosexuality because of this. My kids have grown up quite comfortable around homosexuality and none of them have been infected with ‘gayness’…

The intersection has become quite a spectacle, attracting local news vans, etc… as both sides try to out-demonstrate each other. Each weekend the same scene has played out. Early in the morning, a dozen or so middle aged or older people with small children in tow show up trying to support Prop 8 with their church printed signs. By about mid-day the sides are even, though the anti-8 side has large colorful home made posters, and very loud late teens and early twenties protesting. By about 3 PM, there are about 3 or 4 dozen people against 8, usually including a cross dresser or two…and there is one or two pro-8 people left there screaming and yelling.

My wife went with my kids just to be with them as the protested. My kids, like so many young people, are quite captivated by the entire election and all it entails. I love it… I love young people paying attention and using their own brains to think through all of this. It is a very healthy sign for a future, no matter how bad things look now. But, I could not get in the way of their obvious passion for the issue. So off they went.

While there, I have to state, my wife and kids got called some of the most terrible names you can imagine. People would walk up and get in their face and just become vulgar and abusive. My family’s strategy was to either just smile or laugh at them. My 18 yr old daughter began asking them what church they go to when they would say something particularly abusive, and they would get flustered and stomp away while she laughed at them. But, my wife’s report is that she has never seen Christians (very loudly telling everyone they were Christian and that everyone else was going to hell!) behaving so badly. So bad that they felt they have to say derogatory things to the kids and others who were holding signs. One guy in particular told my wife she was going to hell for raising a bunch of “faggots.” When she pointed out that none of her kids were gay… he asked what she was doing out there? She told him they simply cared about their fellow Americans having their rights trampled on by intolerant Christians. He shut up and went away. It seems that when they get nastiest, reminding them about their Christianity had an impact.

So, a guy came walking by with a very religious Yes-on-8 sign and he had two very small girls in tow, each holding Yes-on-8 signs. My wife guessed they were ages 6 and 8… roughly. The dad was shouting some pretty nasty stuff as he wallked by my family… but all was ok. Suddenly these two teenage boys came up and ripped the signs his little girls were carrying out of their hands and ripped them up… then ran off. The man was obviously upset and began yelling obscenities at everyone before calling the police.

The police came and went… afterwards, my wife tore one of her signs in half and using the back and some markers she had, made two small ‘Yes on 8″ signs and took them over to the little girls, who the man still had out there, even though my wife reports they were absolutely terrified when it happened. She felt so bad for them even being out there. She gave them their signs and she said they were happy and thanked her. The man then came over and got in my wife’s face about the whole thing, blaming her for the signs being ripped in the first place. (no one in my family knew or was with the two boys who did it… in fact they were not even protesting, they were just walking by). He then began grabbing my kids signs and ripping them up and screaming at them. They said he looked like he would explode. This after my wife tried to make things better for his poor little girls who had no business being out there at that age anyway. My wife does not judge people based on their views… she still wanted to help the little girls feel better, and thought the boys who did what they did were very wrong to do so.

He ranted at them using terrible language, but all the while telling them god hated them and they would be sent to hell… while his two little girls watched. He launched into a tirade about homosexuality, using lots of choice and colorful language to describe what two men would do together. He ranted and ranted… again… all while his little girls watched. And listened.

The television ads being run by the Yes-on-8 side seems to focus on one (bogus) point, and that is that schools will now teach gay marriage to their kids. This particular man kept telling my wife that he does “not want schools teaching my girls about faggot marriage” he kept saying to her. All the while, there are his girls, ages 6 and 8, holding signs about an issue they cannot possibly understand, and hearing far more about homosexuality from their own father than they would ever have from any school. So, since then I have watched… and sure enough, in every group of Yes-on-8 protestors and sign holders, there is a family or two with young kids. I suppose they think that it shows that people with family values support the issue… but in reality it shows people who obviously have no problem exposing their kids to the issue, so long as their kids land on the right side… which is the intolerant and hateful side.

If you need more reason to vote against Proposition (h)8, watch this (anti-gay-marriage) video below:

Now, watch this “revised” version of the same video:

If you’re in California, here’s hoping you’re voting No to Proposition 8.

Or else, you could vote with what seems to be the “Christian” side.

I wouldn’t do that if I had the choice.

I prefer the side that supports equality and love.

Apparently, we can’t rely on churches to lead the way in this battle.

(Thanks to Marla for the videos!)

Book Review: Dumbocracy by Marty Beckerman

Marty Beckerman is the author of the recently released Dumbocracy: Adventures with the Loony Left, the Rabid Right, and Other American Idiots.

Beckerman is in his twenties and has written articles for Playboy and The Huffington Post. So it’s easy to pigeonhole him as a young liberal who leans so far to the left that he falls over.

You’d be wrong. In fact, Beckerman dislikes both sides of the political spectrum. Specifically, he dislikes the ends of the spectrum. Dumbocracy is a look at the extremists on both sides of the major cultural issues of our day: Abortion, gay marriage, the War in Iraq, etc.

I read this book in a few hours while on a plane last weekend and found that it helped the time pass by quickly. It’s not that often you get to read a very eye-opening interview with members of Fred (“God Hates Fags”) Phelps’ family and a very anti-climactic interview with the (now deceased) Jerry Falwell in the same place. Right next to a promotional blurb by former presidential candidate Mike Gravel.

His writing style is similar to Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi though he’s not taking a side. In fact, I thought I’d enjoy seeing Beckerman ripping on the “other” side throughout his adventures, but every time that happened, I quickly found myself reading about people on my own side of the issues displaying the same types of behavior and yelling the same kinds of annoying slogans as the opposition. It’s humbling, discouraging, and a reminder that there must be a better way to communicate our values to other people.

It’s unsettling to say the least. But funny. Very funny.

Here’s the opening line, for example:

Opinions are like genitals: if you force others to swallow yours, something is seriously wrong with you.

Ok, so this isn’t a children’s book. In fact, the ad hominem attacks (like referring to President Bush as “King Retard”) take away from a more serious critique of the people Beckerman describes. If you can see past that, though, this is an entertaining book to read. Hell, after I was done, I wanted to have a beer with the author and I don’t even drink.

A different book may have taken sides on the various issues, but that’s not the goal here. The point is really just to hold a mirror to both sides, whether you like what you see or not.

In case you think this is just a book of insults, there is actually some very impressive analysis, too.

In the chapter on abortion, I especially liked this passage:

Never mind that both sides are pro-life and pro-choice. Christians cherish the lives of babies; feminists cherish the lives of women. Christians believe that women should make better choices in bed; feminists believe that women should choose whether they’re ready for motherhood. They might actually find some common ground if everyone were to shut the fuck up for five seconds.

Listen, pro-lifers: abortion is a necessary evil.

Listen, feminists: abortion is a necessary evil.

It’s a book marketed to liberals, but I think conservatives could find a lot of value in it. We’d be better off if we listened to what the other side had to say without getting into a shouting match. There’s power in civilized dialogue. And when you see how idiotic both sides look when the extremists get the attention, you can understand why compromise is so difficult and why we’re rarely able to make progress on the issues that matter to everyone.

More information on the book and the author can be found on Beckerman’s website.

You can also watch this promotional video for Dumbocracy!



Hate Crimes Against Atheists: Not Reported or Not Happening?

The FBI just released statistics on the hate crimes committed in 2007. They break them down into multiple categories, including the number of crimes committed against those of particular religious faiths or sexual orientations.

Of the 7,621 incidents that were motivated by a single factor, how many do you think occurred because someone had it out for atheists?

1%? 10%?

Both percentages are too high.

The correct answer: Only 6. Not 6%. Just 6 crimes. Against 8 non-religious people in total. Committed by 5 offenders.

Of course, one crime is too many. But that number seems extremely low. I would guess that many crimes against atheists go unreported, perhaps because victims don’t want to identify as such. But perhaps we’re also not as hated as we think. Or at least the “hate” we endure is emotional or psychological, not physical.

For the sake of comparison, the number of anti-Jewish crimes was 969. Anti-Islamic? 115. Anti-male-homosexual? 772. Anti-black? 2,658.

What does this number say about atheism in our country?

Are we simply not visible enough to be the focus of hate crimes?

Are we not reporting these crimes for a variety of reasons?

Is the relatively low number a sign of “victory” or a sign of what’s to come when atheism goes more mainstream?

(Thanks to Sasha for the link!)

The Atheist Bus Campaign and Barack Obama

What do they have in common?

Emily Bell of The Guardian writes:

The answer is a lot of money from many people — a new model of fundraising, which the web is facilitating. Obama’s campaign attracted about 90% of its donations from people who gave less than $100. Similarly the atheist bus fund is principally made up of small individual donations and looks as though it might single-handedly reflate the bus advertising market in the coming months.

In just one week, the Athest Bus campaign has raised £110,877 (roughly $173,143).

That’s enough for marketing atheism on British buses many times over.

I hope the British Humanist Association finds an even better way to promote their product with the sudden influx of cash. Hell, they should just rent their own marketing team.

It also raises the question: How is it possible that the British can raise this much money for this cause when Americans who could benefit from the promotion of atheism much more than our European counterparts can’t raise anything even close to that?

Are we that apathetic about giving to atheist organizations or fundraising campaigns?

Or have we simply not come up with a catchy enough way to promote our beliefs?

The End of Infidel Guy

Reggie Finley, a.k.a. The Infidel Guy, has been having a rough time lately. His radio show isn’t doing too well and he’s losing members fast.

Over the past 3 years we have lost over 75% of our subscriber base. Over 95% of the cancellations were the result of gold members losing their jobs. This isn’t enough to keep the site going as well as my children fed and healthy. After fighting and losing to keep staff and volunteers, I just [have October] to throw in the towel. After struggling for years to make IG.com a success, I am now heavily considering re-enlisting into the Army again. This is no joke! Infidelguy.com is now currently in it’s most dire state since it’s inception in 1999.

It’s sad to see the show dying out, but anyone could have predicted this. Reggie had one of the most popular internet radio shows about atheism well before anyone else was doing it. His show was around before podcasts changed how internet radio worked.

Now, though, you don’t need to pay money to hear quality shows that discuss atheism or have interviews with non-religious authors or thinkers. Those other shows get fantastic guests and many have better quality production.

That’s not to say Reggie isn’t doing all he can, but it’s tough to compete for listeners when you’re just one guy and the other podcasts are produced and marketed by atheist publications and organizations.

To his credit, Reggie’s show takes listener phone calls. You can call in to speak to the guest. Other shows don’t do that. That’s not enough to separate his show from all the others, though.

As one commenter on NoGodBlog says, the way to compete in this environment is to offer a completely different business model. People aren’t going to pay for recordings when similar ones are available at no cost. So money would have to be made in another way.

What suggestions do you have? Or is this just a losing battle?

Baby at the Bus Stop

The first two panels are below. Try guessing the punchline of the third panel of this comic from AmazingSuperPowers




Click here to see if you’re right…

There. You are now thoroughly disturbed for the day.

(Thanks to Tom for the link!)

Why Are So Many Evangelical Christians Pregnant?

When you found out that Sarah Palin‘s underage daughter, Bristol Palin, got knocked up, what was your reaction?

Were you surprised?

Did you want to denounce the mother for her hypocrisy?

Did you want to say “I told you so” to anyone who supported abstinence-only sex education?

Another question: What was your reaction when you saw that the conservatives didn’t seem at all concerned about this?

[Liberals] expected the news to dismay the evangelical voters that John McCain was courting with his choice of Palin. Yet reports from the floor of the Republican Convention, in St. Paul, quoted dozens of delegates who seemed unfazed, or even buoyed, by the news.

Margaret Talbot has an article in the latest New Yorker answering the question of why so many evangelical teenagers become pregnant.

The article points out the cultural divide between the sides:

Social liberals in the country’s “blue states” tend to support sex education and are not particularly troubled by the idea that many teen-agers have sex before marriage, but would regard a teen-age daughter’s pregnancy as devastating news. And the social conservatives in “red states” generally advocate abstinence-only education and denounce sex before marriage, but are relatively unruffled if a teen-ager becomes pregnant, as long as she doesn’t choose to have an abortion.

Also interesting is this excerpt regarding those abstinence pledges the Religious Right keep promoting:

[Sociologists Peter Bearman and Hannah Brückner] have also identified a peculiar dilemma: in some schools, if too many teens pledge, the effort basically collapses. Pledgers apparently gather strength from the sense that they are an embattled minority; once their numbers exceed thirty per cent, and proclaimed chastity becomes the norm, that special identity is lost. With such a fragile formula, it’s hard to imagine how educators can ever get it right: once the self-proclaimed virgin clique hits the thirty-one-per-cent mark, suddenly it’s Sodom and Gomorrah.

The whole notion of guilt-tripping everyone in your faith to remain abstinent until marriage is ridiculous. If people want to choose it for themselves, that’s fine. But to tell young people that sex is evil or horrible or shameful is wrong. Tell them the real consequences. Tell them how to protect themselves from many of those consequences.

Above all, if you create these rules, don’t act like everything is ok when the rules are broken.

We already know what goes on at many Christian summer camps

Maybe Atheists Shouldn’t Be in Foxholes…

Jessica Hagy offers a different take on the (completely inaccurate) saying, “There are no atheists in foxholes.”