<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. President, Rebuild That Wall!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fear</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-261336</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-261336</guid>
		<description>The ironic thing is that Bush and his cronies used the Religious Right with promised action on faith-based initiatives that never materialised.

The Religious Right sold themselves and their congregations out just so they could fool themselves into thinking they had any influence on Washington politics.

Faith Based initiatives was a scam - read up the facts. Jim Wallis revealed all this in his book God&#039;s Politics.

Oh and well done for once again misinterpreting the intention behind separation of church and state &lt;em&gt;yet again...&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ironic thing is that Bush and his cronies used the Religious Right with promised action on faith-based initiatives that never materialised.</p>
<p>The Religious Right sold themselves and their congregations out just so they could fool themselves into thinking they had any influence on Washington politics.</p>
<p>Faith Based initiatives was a scam &#8211; read up the facts. Jim Wallis revealed all this in his book God&#8217;s Politics.</p>
<p>Oh and well done for once again misinterpreting the intention behind separation of church and state <em>yet again&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MY LIFE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rebuild the Wall of Separation!</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-261149</link>
		<dc:creator>MY LIFE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rebuild the Wall of Separation!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-261149</guid>
		<description>[...] Friendly Atheist reports that FFRF will be running this quarter-page ad on January 20 in the Washington [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friendly Atheist reports that FFRF will be running this quarter-page ad on January 20 in the Washington [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Zamecki</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-261099</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Zamecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-261099</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great ad. I think all national Atheist groups should do something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great ad. I think all national Atheist groups should do something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoverFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-261088</link>
		<dc:creator>hoverFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-261088</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a copy handy but didn&#039;t Obama say in The Audacity of Hope that it was wrong to leave religion at the door when it comes to government?  This is not to say that he thinks that religion is a controlling factor in decision making but as one factor among many that should not be discarded.  As a man of proclaimed faith he cannot separate his faith from his thoughts.  Instead he should factor in how his faith creates a bias and ensure that his bias does not favour one group above another.  He strikes me as someone reasonably and intelligent enough to manage this so I don&#039;t see him supporting any new faith initiatives.  

Equally I don&#039;t see him cutting back on anything that is seen to work either.  As much as the idea of faith based initiatives might turn your stomach it is still fair to say that some of them do appear to work.  Faith is a powerful motivator after all and having it turned in a direction where it could do good is better than nothing.

If programs are to be cancelled they will be on the grounds of effectiveness rather than religion.  I can see a lot of funding being cut in the next few years and those that are wasteful or ineffective must go first whether they are secular or faith based.

There are over 170 faith based initiatives but would you really want to cut funding on a community level drug counselling service because it ran out of a church or a vaccination program run by Christian doctors?  What should be cut are things that are harmful like state funded abstinence only education or creationist attacks on school education programs.

Unfortunately if you say you want to cut faith initiatives it is the former type that is focused on which makes you look like a cad.  Rebuilding that wall of separation should mean an end to new faith initiatives and a dismantling of initiatives with no secular charitable purpose.  I think that this should include tax exemption for churches that perform no charitable work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a copy handy but didn&#8217;t Obama say in The Audacity of Hope that it was wrong to leave religion at the door when it comes to government?  This is not to say that he thinks that religion is a controlling factor in decision making but as one factor among many that should not be discarded.  As a man of proclaimed faith he cannot separate his faith from his thoughts.  Instead he should factor in how his faith creates a bias and ensure that his bias does not favour one group above another.  He strikes me as someone reasonably and intelligent enough to manage this so I don&#8217;t see him supporting any new faith initiatives.  </p>
<p>Equally I don&#8217;t see him cutting back on anything that is seen to work either.  As much as the idea of faith based initiatives might turn your stomach it is still fair to say that some of them do appear to work.  Faith is a powerful motivator after all and having it turned in a direction where it could do good is better than nothing.</p>
<p>If programs are to be cancelled they will be on the grounds of effectiveness rather than religion.  I can see a lot of funding being cut in the next few years and those that are wasteful or ineffective must go first whether they are secular or faith based.</p>
<p>There are over 170 faith based initiatives but would you really want to cut funding on a community level drug counselling service because it ran out of a church or a vaccination program run by Christian doctors?  What should be cut are things that are harmful like state funded abstinence only education or creationist attacks on school education programs.</p>
<p>Unfortunately if you say you want to cut faith initiatives it is the former type that is focused on which makes you look like a cad.  Rebuilding that wall of separation should mean an end to new faith initiatives and a dismantling of initiatives with no secular charitable purpose.  I think that this should include tax exemption for churches that perform no charitable work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cannonball Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-261047</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannonball Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-261047</guid>
		<description>I doubt it&#039;ll have much effect, Obama&#039;s already chucked his hat in with the religious crowd. However I&#039;ll gladly send FFRF a wee donation even though I&#039;m from another country because the ad is so well thought-out and presented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it&#8217;ll have much effect, Obama&#8217;s already chucked his hat in with the religious crowd. However I&#8217;ll gladly send FFRF a wee donation even though I&#8217;m from another country because the ad is so well thought-out and presented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-260798</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-260798</guid>
		<description>I ditto Debbie Downer.

WHOOO... who designed THAT ad?  Tony Alamo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ditto Debbie Downer.</p>
<p>WHOOO&#8230; who designed THAT ad?  Tony Alamo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-260767</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-260767</guid>
		<description>I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but it looks like it belongs in the back of a magazine with the &quot;I lost 45 pounds with one pill!&quot; ads. It&#039;s only missing the, &quot;For more info, send a SASE to PO Box....&quot;


I would gladly offer them my design services in the future. For serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but it looks like it belongs in the back of a magazine with the &#8220;I lost 45 pounds with one pill!&#8221; ads. It&#8217;s only missing the, &#8220;For more info, send a SASE to PO Box&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would gladly offer them my design services in the future. For serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-260752</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-260752</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a nicer ad in terms of tone than some of the other things that have come out of FFRF recently.  But it&#039;ll have no policy effect; Obama&#039;s going to expand faith-based initiatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nicer ad in terms of tone than some of the other things that have come out of FFRF recently.  But it&#8217;ll have no policy effect; Obama&#8217;s going to expand faith-based initiatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahH</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-260747</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-260747</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/03/AR2008070302453.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;During his campaign&lt;/a&gt;, Obama said multiple times that he&#039;d fund faith-based initiatives (as well as secular charities) but only if they did as the ad suggests - keep their charity and their religious teachings separate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/03/AR2008070302453.html" rel="nofollow">During his campaign</a>, Obama said multiple times that he&#8217;d fund faith-based initiatives (as well as secular charities) but only if they did as the ad suggests &#8211; keep their charity and their religious teachings separate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/01/15/mr-president-rebuild-that-wall/#comment-260739</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=7797#comment-260739</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great ad! I only hope Obama takes it to heart and acts on its message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great ad! I only hope Obama takes it to heart and acts on its message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/310 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 03:48:57 -->
