<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash This Parade Magazine Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Fidalgo</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-270211</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fidalgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-270211</guid>
		<description>I am astounded at the wording of the question: &quot;Do you &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;agree&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;???&quot; Are they assuming all readers of Parade are biologists? Have they all taken graduate level courses in life sciences? Who cares if they agree?

Sigh. Deep breath.

In other words, &quot;accept&quot; or &quot;believe&quot; would be better, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am astounded at the wording of the question: &#8220;Do you <i><b>agree</b></i>???&#8221; Are they assuming all readers of Parade are biologists? Have they all taken graduate level courses in life sciences? Who cares if they agree?</p>
<p>Sigh. Deep breath.</p>
<p>In other words, &#8220;accept&#8221; or &#8220;believe&#8221; would be better, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David D.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269425</link>
		<dc:creator>David D.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269425</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even see this as &quot;crashing&quot; a poll; I see it as participating in it.


~David D.G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even see this as &#8220;crashing&#8221; a poll; I see it as participating in it.</p>
<p>~David D.G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tao Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269346</link>
		<dc:creator>Tao Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269346</guid>
		<description>Was anyone else really annoyed at the article and the wording of the poll?

The article because it seemed to suggest that only &quot;scientists and secularists&quot; accept evolution while everyone else rejects it.  

The poll itself is problematic because it seems to assume evolutionary theory begins and ends with Darwin, that evolution is something that happened in the past rather than something that is ongoing, and finally that the only nonscientific alternatives are related to God.  If the superstitions of a bunch of bronze-age goat herders can be a valid response to a question of modern science, why not other superstitions too?  At least Raelianism is modern. 

Can we please do something about this nonsense?  Poll crashing isn&#039;t enough.  I wrote them &lt;a href=&quot;http://noonespecial.ca/cacophony/2009/02/11/poll-crashing-parade/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a letter&lt;/a&gt;.

Updated stats:

Yes. 91% (974 votes)
No. 4% (39 votes)
Yes and no. 5% (51 votes)
I don’t know. 1% (5 votes)
Total Votes: 1069</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was anyone else really annoyed at the article and the wording of the poll?</p>
<p>The article because it seemed to suggest that only &#8220;scientists and secularists&#8221; accept evolution while everyone else rejects it.  </p>
<p>The poll itself is problematic because it seems to assume evolutionary theory begins and ends with Darwin, that evolution is something that happened in the past rather than something that is ongoing, and finally that the only nonscientific alternatives are related to God.  If the superstitions of a bunch of bronze-age goat herders can be a valid response to a question of modern science, why not other superstitions too?  At least Raelianism is modern. </p>
<p>Can we please do something about this nonsense?  Poll crashing isn&#8217;t enough.  I wrote them <a href="http://noonespecial.ca/cacophony/2009/02/11/poll-crashing-parade/" rel="nofollow">a letter</a>.</p>
<p>Updated stats:</p>
<p>Yes. 91% (974 votes)<br />
No. 4% (39 votes)<br />
Yes and no. 5% (51 votes)<br />
I don’t know. 1% (5 votes)<br />
Total Votes: 1069</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Awesomeson</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269299</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Awesomeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269299</guid>
		<description>Yes. Humans evolved without divine intervention 90% (794 votes)
feedback bar
No. God created humans as they are 4% (34 votes)
feedback bar
Yes and no. Evolution required divine intervention 6% (49 votes)
feedback bar
I don&#039;t know. 1% (5 votes)

Wee!  Skewing statistics is fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Humans evolved without divine intervention 90% (794 votes)<br />
feedback bar<br />
No. God created humans as they are 4% (34 votes)<br />
feedback bar<br />
Yes and no. Evolution required divine intervention 6% (49 votes)<br />
feedback bar<br />
I don&#8217;t know. 1% (5 votes)</p>
<p>Wee!  Skewing statistics is fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269283</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269283</guid>
		<description>I dunno!  Maybe we did too good a job.  Have you looked at the results lately?  Hardly convincing from a nation where almost 50% of the public believes that the Earth was created in just under a week by a megalomaniac with too much free time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno!  Maybe we did too good a job.  Have you looked at the results lately?  Hardly convincing from a nation where almost 50% of the public believes that the Earth was created in just under a week by a megalomaniac with too much free time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269275</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269275</guid>
		<description>cookie based. child&#039;s play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cookie based. child&#8217;s play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269270</guid>
		<description>I voted &quot;Yes,&quot; but I&#039;m rooting for &quot;I don&#039;t know.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted &#8220;Yes,&#8221; but I&#8217;m rooting for &#8220;I don&#8217;t know.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OzAtheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269259</link>
		<dc:creator>OzAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269259</guid>
		<description>crash done

crash is also being promoted on twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crash done</p>
<p>crash is also being promoted on twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chal</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269257</link>
		<dc:creator>Chal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269257</guid>
		<description>Yes is still going strong at 650+ votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes is still going strong at 650+ votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryd</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/02/10/crash-this-parade-magazine-poll/#comment-269256</link>
		<dc:creator>larryd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=8696#comment-269256</guid>
		<description>Thank you for voting!
Yes. 87% (512 votes)
No. 5% (30 votes)
Yes and no. 7% (39 votes)
I don&#039;t know. 1% (5 votes)
Total Votes: 586</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for voting!<br />
Yes. 87% (512 votes)<br />
No. 5% (30 votes)<br />
Yes and no. 7% (39 votes)<br />
I don&#8217;t know. 1% (5 votes)<br />
Total Votes: 586</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/310 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 06:33:32 -->
