<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Aftermath of Rick Warren&#8217;s Hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298529</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298529</guid>
		<description>Fixing up my comment:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Now wait a minute here. Bishop James Ussher showed Earth was created in 4004 B.C. What was marriage like in the first 1013 years? I&#039;m particularly interested in the kind of marriage Cain and his wife had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixing up my comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Now wait a minute here. Bishop James Ussher showed Earth was created in 4004 B.C. What was marriage like in the first 1013 years? I&#8217;m particularly interested in the kind of marriage Cain and his wife had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298528</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298528</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
“WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Now wait a minute here. Bishop James Ussher showed Earth was created in 4004 B.C. What was marriage like in the first 1013 years? I&#039;m particularly interested in the kind of marriage Cain and his wife had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
“WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Now wait a minute here. Bishop James Ussher showed Earth was created in 4004 B.C. What was marriage like in the first 1013 years? I&#8217;m particularly interested in the kind of marriage Cain and his wife had.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth McFadden</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298448</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth McFadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298448</guid>
		<description>After Erp&#039;s comment above, I went back to my sources ... the veracity of the Nurnberg law does indeed seem questionable; my apologies.  I pulled the info quickly from the New World Encyclopedia site, and didn&#039;t look for a corroborating source.  Wikipedia lists the same info, but in the footnotes it&#039;s clear that the accuracy is suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Erp&#8217;s comment above, I went back to my sources &#8230; the veracity of the Nurnberg law does indeed seem questionable; my apologies.  I pulled the info quickly from the New World Encyclopedia site, and didn&#8217;t look for a corroborating source.  Wikipedia lists the same info, but in the footnotes it&#8217;s clear that the accuracy is suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298446</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298446</guid>
		<description>There are lots of ways to create families world-wide.  Recently contacted tribes sometimes give us interesting ones.  Like people ho believe that each child has two to three fathers.  (They get them the way that you would imagine.) Or tribes where it&#039;s not terribly important who your father is, because brothers raise their sisters&#039; children.  It makes you realize that, in the mists of history, marriage probably had many forms, or didn&#039;t exist in any recognizable way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of ways to create families world-wide.  Recently contacted tribes sometimes give us interesting ones.  Like people ho believe that each child has two to three fathers.  (They get them the way that you would imagine.) Or tribes where it&#8217;s not terribly important who your father is, because brothers raise their sisters&#8217; children.  It makes you realize that, in the mists of history, marriage probably had many forms, or didn&#8217;t exist in any recognizable way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeafAtheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298215</link>
		<dc:creator>DeafAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298215</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s exhausted from trying to keep his lies straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s exhausted from trying to keep his lies straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erp</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298177</link>
		<dc:creator>Erp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298177</guid>
		<description>I should point out that the Nürnberg polygamy law of 1650 seems likely to be legend not fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should point out that the Nürnberg polygamy law of 1650 seems likely to be legend not fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth McFadden</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298039</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth McFadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298039</guid>
		<description>&quot;For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion - this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews — historically, marriage is a man and a woman.&quot;

I have to agree with Cindy, Hoverfrog, and others.  Warren is simply wrong.

Some quick research produced this information regarding just one of his subjects:  polygamy.  WARNING:  long post.  But it&#039;s interesting reading.

In about 80 percent of the world&#039;s societies, some form of plural marriage, called polygamy, is also allowed. The most common form of polygamy is polygyny, in which a man is married to two or more women.

Some global examples of polygamy:

Polygyny is permitted in Judaism.   According to Talmudic law, Abraham had three wives, and Solomon had hundreds of wives. The practice continued till Rabbi Gershom ben Yehudah (960 C.E to 1030 C.E) issued an edict against it. The Jewish Sephardic communities living in Muslim countries continued the practice till as late as 1950, until an Act of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel extended the ban on marrying more than one wife. The State of Israel has made polygamy illegal, but in practice the law is not enforced, primarily so as not to interfere with Bedouin culture, where polygamy is common. Provisions were instituted to allow for existing polygamous families emigrating from countries where the practice was legal.

In Islam, polygamy is allowed for men, with the specific limitation that they can only have up to four wives at any one time.  In the modern Islamic world, polygamy is mainly found in traditionalist Arab cultures --   Saudi Arabia, and parts of West and East Africa (In Sudan it is encouraged from the president as female population is high)[44]. Among the 22 member states of the Arab League, Tunisia alone explicitly prohibits polygamy.

In Christianity, polygamy has been uncommon, but not unheard-of.  On February 14, 1650, the parliament at Nürnberg decreed that, because so many men were killed during the Thirty Years’ War, every man was allowed to marry up to ten women. The men were admonished to behave honorably, provide for their wives properly, and prevent animosity among them.  


In Sub-Saharan Africa, there has often been a tension between the Christian churches&#039; insistence on monogamy and traditional polygamy. In some instances in recent times there have been moves for accommodation; in others churches have resisted such moves strongly. African Independent Churches have sometimes referred to those parts of the Old Testament which describe polygamy in defending the practice.

Early leaders of the LDS (Mormon) church practiced and in some cases encouraged polgyny, which they called “plural marriage.”  The practice caused controvery, and was officially denounced by the mainstream LDS church in 1890, though splinter groups are known to continue the practice.

Polygamy existed all over Africa as an aspect of culture or/and religion. Plural marriages have been more common than not in the history of Africa. Many African societies saw children as a form of wealth thus the more children a family had the more powerful it was. Thus polygamy was part of empire building. It was only during the colonial era that plural marriage was perceived as taboo. It is very common in West Africa (Muslim and traditionalist).

In South Africa, traditionalists commonly practice polygamy. The leader of the ANC, Jacob Zuma is also openly in favor of plural marriages, being married to numerous wives himself. The wives live in small houses in a circle around the master compound.

In India, it was legal for Hindu men to have multiple wives until the 1954 Hindu Marriage Act.

Polyandrous marriages (women with multiple husbands) have been recently documented in Tibet, Bhutan, and Ladahk.

In Mongolia, there has been discussion about legalizing polygamy to reduce the imbalance of the male and female population.

In Thailand, until polygamy was outlawed by King Rama VI in the early 20th century,  it was expected that wealthy or upper-class Thai men were historically recognized to maintain mansions consisting of multiple wives and their children in the same residence. Among the royalty and courtiers in the past, wives were classified as principal, secondary, and slave. Today, the tradition of minor wives still remains, but the practice is different from that of the past. Due to the expense involved, minor wives are mostly limited to the wealthy men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion &#8211; this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews — historically, marriage is a man and a woman.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have to agree with Cindy, Hoverfrog, and others.  Warren is simply wrong.</p>
<p>Some quick research produced this information regarding just one of his subjects:  polygamy.  WARNING:  long post.  But it&#8217;s interesting reading.</p>
<p>In about 80 percent of the world&#8217;s societies, some form of plural marriage, called polygamy, is also allowed. The most common form of polygamy is polygyny, in which a man is married to two or more women.</p>
<p>Some global examples of polygamy:</p>
<p>Polygyny is permitted in Judaism.   According to Talmudic law, Abraham had three wives, and Solomon had hundreds of wives. The practice continued till Rabbi Gershom ben Yehudah (960 C.E to 1030 C.E) issued an edict against it. The Jewish Sephardic communities living in Muslim countries continued the practice till as late as 1950, until an Act of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel extended the ban on marrying more than one wife. The State of Israel has made polygamy illegal, but in practice the law is not enforced, primarily so as not to interfere with Bedouin culture, where polygamy is common. Provisions were instituted to allow for existing polygamous families emigrating from countries where the practice was legal.</p>
<p>In Islam, polygamy is allowed for men, with the specific limitation that they can only have up to four wives at any one time.  In the modern Islamic world, polygamy is mainly found in traditionalist Arab cultures &#8212;   Saudi Arabia, and parts of West and East Africa (In Sudan it is encouraged from the president as female population is high)[44]. Among the 22 member states of the Arab League, Tunisia alone explicitly prohibits polygamy.</p>
<p>In Christianity, polygamy has been uncommon, but not unheard-of.  On February 14, 1650, the parliament at Nürnberg decreed that, because so many men were killed during the Thirty Years’ War, every man was allowed to marry up to ten women. The men were admonished to behave honorably, provide for their wives properly, and prevent animosity among them.  </p>
<p>In Sub-Saharan Africa, there has often been a tension between the Christian churches&#8217; insistence on monogamy and traditional polygamy. In some instances in recent times there have been moves for accommodation; in others churches have resisted such moves strongly. African Independent Churches have sometimes referred to those parts of the Old Testament which describe polygamy in defending the practice.</p>
<p>Early leaders of the LDS (Mormon) church practiced and in some cases encouraged polgyny, which they called “plural marriage.”  The practice caused controvery, and was officially denounced by the mainstream LDS church in 1890, though splinter groups are known to continue the practice.</p>
<p>Polygamy existed all over Africa as an aspect of culture or/and religion. Plural marriages have been more common than not in the history of Africa. Many African societies saw children as a form of wealth thus the more children a family had the more powerful it was. Thus polygamy was part of empire building. It was only during the colonial era that plural marriage was perceived as taboo. It is very common in West Africa (Muslim and traditionalist).</p>
<p>In South Africa, traditionalists commonly practice polygamy. The leader of the ANC, Jacob Zuma is also openly in favor of plural marriages, being married to numerous wives himself. The wives live in small houses in a circle around the master compound.</p>
<p>In India, it was legal for Hindu men to have multiple wives until the 1954 Hindu Marriage Act.</p>
<p>Polyandrous marriages (women with multiple husbands) have been recently documented in Tibet, Bhutan, and Ladahk.</p>
<p>In Mongolia, there has been discussion about legalizing polygamy to reduce the imbalance of the male and female population.</p>
<p>In Thailand, until polygamy was outlawed by King Rama VI in the early 20th century,  it was expected that wealthy or upper-class Thai men were historically recognized to maintain mansions consisting of multiple wives and their children in the same residence. Among the royalty and courtiers in the past, wives were classified as principal, secondary, and slave. Today, the tradition of minor wives still remains, but the practice is different from that of the past. Due to the expense involved, minor wives are mostly limited to the wealthy men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoverFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298022</link>
		<dc:creator>hoverFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298022</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion - this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews — historically, marriage is a man and a woman. &lt;/blockquote&gt;I wondered briefly if I might be wrong and Warren might be right so I checked out wikipedia (which is never wrong) and apparently there are lots of different definitions of marriage.  I was right after all.  What a relief.

I didn&#039;t know that in Islam a man may have up to four wives if he partitions his time and wealth between them equally.  Nor did I know that Unitarian Universalist, Metropolitan Community Church, and Quaker, United Church of Canada and Reform Jewish congregations allow for same sex marriages.  Isn&#039;t that sweet.

Point of fact on Buddhism:  There is little in Buddhism that encourages or restricts marriage at all.  There are codes of conduct for sexual behaviour.  Buddhism teaches that sensual enjoyment and desire in general, and sexual pleasure in particular, are hindrances to enlightenment.  Some sects restrict access to ordination for homosexuals but not all.

It is such a shame that Rick Warren doesn&#039;t have access to the Internet or, you know, books.  If he did he&#039;d be able to check out things called &quot;facts&quot; which might support or contradict his opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage" rel="nofollow"><br />
<blockquote>For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion &#8211; this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews — historically, marriage is a man and a woman. </p></blockquote>
<p>I wondered briefly if I might be wrong and Warren might be right so I checked out wikipedia (which is never wrong) and apparently there are lots of different definitions of marriage.  I was right after all.  What a relief.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know that in Islam a man may have up to four wives if he partitions his time and wealth between them equally.  Nor did I know that Unitarian Universalist, Metropolitan Community Church, and Quaker, United Church of Canada and Reform Jewish congregations allow for same sex marriages.  Isn&#8217;t that sweet.</p>
<p>Point of fact on Buddhism:  There is little in Buddhism that encourages or restricts marriage at all.  There are codes of conduct for sexual behaviour.  Buddhism teaches that sensual enjoyment and desire in general, and sexual pleasure in particular, are hindrances to enlightenment.  Some sects restrict access to ordination for homosexuals but not all.</p>
<p>It is such a shame that Rick Warren doesn&#8217;t have access to the Internet or, you know, books.  If he did he&#8217;d be able to check out things called &#8220;facts&#8221; which might support or contradict his opinions.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim D.</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298021</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298021</guid>
		<description>Rick Warren is an unadulterated Douche Bag, with a capital &quot;D&quot; and &quot;B.&quot; That&#039;s all I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren is an unadulterated Douche Bag, with a capital &#8220;D&#8221; and &#8220;B.&#8221; That&#8217;s all I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Mondello</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/04/14/the-aftermath-of-rick-warrens-hypocrisy/#comment-298010</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Mondello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=10518#comment-298010</guid>
		<description>I was disgusted at Steven Waldman when I read about his standing up for Warren.

Just showed be BeliefNet is not for me, infact, I posted on he article that I threw his book in the trash...I was planning on reading it because he seemed to have a lot of information about the founders relatioship with religion.

I havent looked at any follow-up he has to his defense of Rick Warren, but I lost all interest in him and BeliefNet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disgusted at Steven Waldman when I read about his standing up for Warren.</p>
<p>Just showed be BeliefNet is not for me, infact, I posted on he article that I threw his book in the trash&#8230;I was planning on reading it because he seemed to have a lot of information about the founders relatioship with religion.</p>
<p>I havent looked at any follow-up he has to his defense of Rick Warren, but I lost all interest in him and BeliefNet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 380/384 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-28 02:02:12 -->
