<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Billboards Fight Against The Separation of Church &amp; State &#8220;Lie&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 07:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-370832</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-370832</guid>
		<description>I think the reason Xtians create such verbiose billboards is that they figure Jeebus will protect anyone reading it.  It&#039;s like a 5 second free pass from having to pay attention to other traffic on the freeway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason Xtians create such verbiose billboards is that they figure Jeebus will protect anyone reading it.  It&#8217;s like a 5 second free pass from having to pay attention to other traffic on the freeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoda</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-356564</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-356564</guid>
		<description>Beware of anger.  It will lead you to the dark side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of anger.  It will lead you to the dark side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332962</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Washington may have endorsed the value of religion, but that’s not the same as saying he was a Christian. I’m pretty sure that scholars disagree, or at least are unsure, on that point.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some say Washington was a Christian, others say he was a deist.  At least one says he was a &quot;Christian deist&quot; -- not quite one, not quite the other, but somewhere in the middle.

&lt;blockquote&gt;He certainly didn’t want to favor one religion over another.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The question on the table, however, is whether he favored religion over irreligion.  His Farewell Address certainly indicates that he did.  Of course, favoring religion over irrelegion is certainly not incompatible with favoring the separation of church and state.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And Washington didn’t have a hand in drafting the Constitution, AFAIK.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Depends on what you mean by &quot;have a hand in drafting the Constitution.&quot;  He chaired the convention that did the drafting.  As chair, he did not participate directly in the drafting and debate process.  Along with James Madison, he was one of the only two future presidents who actually signed the document.

It&#039;s not really relevant here, because the clause in the Constitution generally appealed to as mandating separation of church and state is the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.  The First Amendment was not part of the Constitution as originally ratified.  It was added slightly later, during Washington&#039;s presidency.  As president, Washington would have had no direct role in the adoption of the amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Washington may have endorsed the value of religion, but that’s not the same as saying he was a Christian. I’m pretty sure that scholars disagree, or at least are unsure, on that point.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some say Washington was a Christian, others say he was a deist.  At least one says he was a &#8220;Christian deist&#8221; &#8212; not quite one, not quite the other, but somewhere in the middle.</p>
<blockquote><p>He certainly didn’t want to favor one religion over another.</p></blockquote>
<p>The question on the table, however, is whether he favored religion over irreligion.  His Farewell Address certainly indicates that he did.  Of course, favoring religion over irrelegion is certainly not incompatible with favoring the separation of church and state.</p>
<blockquote><p>And Washington didn’t have a hand in drafting the Constitution, AFAIK.</p></blockquote>
<p>Depends on what you mean by &#8220;have a hand in drafting the Constitution.&#8221;  He chaired the convention that did the drafting.  As chair, he did not participate directly in the drafting and debate process.  Along with James Madison, he was one of the only two future presidents who actually signed the document.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not really relevant here, because the clause in the Constitution generally appealed to as mandating separation of church and state is the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.  The First Amendment was not part of the Constitution as originally ratified.  It was added slightly later, during Washington&#8217;s presidency.  As president, Washington would have had no direct role in the adoption of the amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatBallou</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332780</link>
		<dc:creator>CatBallou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332780</guid>
		<description>Washington may have endorsed the value of religion, but that&#039;s not the same as saying he was a &lt;i&gt;Christian.&lt;/i&gt; I&#039;m pretty sure that scholars disagree, or at least are unsure, on that point. He certainly didn&#039;t want to favor one religion over another.
But to Steven&#039;s point about the veneration of our founding fathers, I agree that it&#039;s completely out of place in some circumstances. When we&#039;re discussing constitutional issues, it&#039;s germane---otherwise, not necessarily. 
And Washington didn&#039;t have a hand in drafting the Constitution, AFAIK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington may have endorsed the value of religion, but that&#8217;s not the same as saying he was a <i>Christian.</i> I&#8217;m pretty sure that scholars disagree, or at least are unsure, on that point. He certainly didn&#8217;t want to favor one religion over another.<br />
But to Steven&#8217;s point about the veneration of our founding fathers, I agree that it&#8217;s completely out of place in some circumstances. When we&#8217;re discussing constitutional issues, it&#8217;s germane&#8212;otherwise, not necessarily.<br />
And Washington didn&#8217;t have a hand in drafting the Constitution, AFAIK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church Of The Smashing Orangey Bit Responds To Atheist &#38; Christian Billboards - The Atheist Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332774</link>
		<dc:creator>Church Of The Smashing Orangey Bit Responds To Atheist &#38; Christian Billboards - The Atheist Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332774</guid>
		<description>[...] have recently begun putting billboards up claiming that the separation of church and state is not what the Founding Fathers wanted for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have recently begun putting billboards up claiming that the separation of church and state is not what the Founding Fathers wanted for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332747</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332747</guid>
		<description>What should happen is that an atheist rents out the next billboard down the road and put up a sign that says &quot;Washington didn&#039;t say that.  They&#039;re lying.  Check it out yourself.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should happen is that an atheist rents out the next billboard down the road and put up a sign that says &#8220;Washington didn&#8217;t say that.  They&#8217;re lying.  Check it out yourself.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrot132</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332733</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrot132</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332733</guid>
		<description>The site says &quot;The quotes and the historical references on the pages of NoSeparation.org immediately disprove the &#039;separation of church and state&#039; lie.&quot;

On the other hand, we have our Bill of Rights. Not only is separation of church and state included in the first of its ten amendments, it is the &lt;strong&gt;very first&lt;/strong&gt; of the five separate provisions of that amendment, and therefore, perhaps the one that our Founding Fathers cared the most about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site says &#8220;The quotes and the historical references on the pages of NoSeparation.org immediately disprove the &#8216;separation of church and state&#8217; lie.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, we have our Bill of Rights. Not only is separation of church and state included in the first of its ten amendments, it is the <strong>very first</strong> of the five separate provisions of that amendment, and therefore, perhaps the one that our Founding Fathers cared the most about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearing false witness on Christian billboards - Rant &#38; Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332635</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearing false witness on Christian billboards - Rant &#38; Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332635</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t make this stuff up.&#8221; Except, apparently in this case, they could (h/t to Friendly Atheist):   A Hillsborough public policy group whose Christian platform included a push for a state ban on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t make this stuff up.&#8221; Except, apparently in this case, they could (h/t to Friendly Atheist):   A Hillsborough public policy group whose Christian platform included a push for a state ban on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoverFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332617</link>
		<dc:creator>hoverFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332617</guid>
		<description>I think they should use the quote from Revelations 22:22 &lt;blockquote&gt;And the Lord Jesus Christ spake &quot;What? I was kidding, come on.  Dude! You didn&#039;t think I was serious&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Hey, if lying is OK...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should use the quote from Revelations 22:22<br />
<blockquote>And the Lord Jesus Christ spake &#8220;What? I was kidding, come on.  Dude! You didn&#8217;t think I was serious&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, if lying is OK&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Left Coaster</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/07/21/billboards-fight-against-the-separation-of-church-state-lie/#comment-332584</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Left Coaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14065#comment-332584</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re liars, and they also have no concept of marketing or design. I can&#039;t believe how much money is wasted on religious billboards that are too wordy and are difficult to read, say, from a speeding car on a freeway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re liars, and they also have no concept of marketing or design. I can&#8217;t believe how much money is wasted on religious billboards that are too wordy and are difficult to read, say, from a speeding car on a freeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 379/383 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-28 02:42:06 -->
