<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s Probably No Cod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doubting Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-344027</link>
		<dc:creator>Doubting Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-344027</guid>
		<description>Will billboard companies refuse to run the ad because it might offend Christians?  I think it would be funny if a bunch of Christians misread it to say God instead of cod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will billboard companies refuse to run the ad because it might offend Christians?  I think it would be funny if a bunch of Christians misread it to say God instead of cod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Liles</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-343030</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Liles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-343030</guid>
		<description>I believe the saying is: Imatation is the sincerest form of flattery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the saying is: Imatation is the sincerest form of flattery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bekka</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342760</link>
		<dc:creator>Bekka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342760</guid>
		<description>Tee hee, greenpeace and atheism, two of my favorite things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tee hee, greenpeace and atheism, two of my favorite things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342453</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does this mean that the atheist bus ad campaign has reached iconic status? I am impressed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m guessing not.  My guess is some Greenpeace PR wank came up with it and loved the pun so much that they wouldn&#039;t let go, despite the facts that the ads haven&#039;t run here in Nova Scotia, and the ruckus outside the blogosphere is minimal.  I don&#039;t think those coattails are as long as they think.

We&#039;re supposedly going to get the real bus ads here, but haven&#039;t.  The ads were originally rejected, then, after a landmark case in Calgary in the heathens&#039; favour, the regulatory body mentioned they will allow the ads if another application is filed.  I remember reading that somebody or other said they would reapply, but haven&#039;t heard anything past that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does this mean that the atheist bus ad campaign has reached iconic status? I am impressed.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing not.  My guess is some Greenpeace PR wank came up with it and loved the pun so much that they wouldn&#8217;t let go, despite the facts that the ads haven&#8217;t run here in Nova Scotia, and the ruckus outside the blogosphere is minimal.  I don&#8217;t think those coattails are as long as they think.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re supposedly going to get the real bus ads here, but haven&#8217;t.  The ads were originally rejected, then, after a landmark case in Calgary in the heathens&#8217; favour, the regulatory body mentioned they will allow the ads if another application is filed.  I remember reading that somebody or other said they would reapply, but haven&#8217;t heard anything past that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaylya</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342428</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaylya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342428</guid>
		<description>I guess ads haven&#039;t run in Halifax yet, but, they&#039;ve been mentioned in the news about a month ago and supposedly they will be running now. And given the media coverage with the rejection, people undoubtedly have heard of them... honestly, more so than had they just quietly been run with no controversy.

In Ottawa, I only saw the ad a couple times while it was running. And that&#039;s not because I didn&#039;t spend much time around buses. But all the coverage while they were rejected and then approved (where the letters to the editor and such from religious folks were generally supportive) and then when the ads were actually running (where there were more &quot;I&#039;m offended&quot; letters) makes sure people know about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess ads haven&#8217;t run in Halifax yet, but, they&#8217;ve been mentioned in the news about a month ago and supposedly they will be running now. And given the media coverage with the rejection, people undoubtedly have heard of them&#8230; honestly, more so than had they just quietly been run with no controversy.</p>
<p>In Ottawa, I only saw the ad a couple times while it was running. And that&#8217;s not because I didn&#8217;t spend much time around buses. But all the coverage while they were rejected and then approved (where the letters to the editor and such from religious folks were generally supportive) and then when the ads were actually running (where there were more &#8220;I&#8217;m offended&#8221; letters) makes sure people know about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jemand</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342243</link>
		<dc:creator>jemand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342243</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s awesome!

And hey, &quot;think of the future&quot; is actually an implicit atheistic slogan anyway, we ain&#039;t going to be spirited off the planet any minute now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s awesome!</p>
<p>And hey, &#8220;think of the future&#8221; is actually an implicit atheistic slogan anyway, we ain&#8217;t going to be spirited off the planet any minute now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no2religion</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342240</link>
		<dc:creator>no2religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342240</guid>
		<description>I think I am offended. 8~D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am offended. 8~D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auryn</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342173</link>
		<dc:creator>Auryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342173</guid>
		<description>*applause*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*applause*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342123</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342123</guid>
		<description>I like it, wordplay is fun. I hope this is a sign of success in how the atheist ads were recieved. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it, wordplay is fun. I hope this is a sign of success in how the atheist ads were recieved. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greta Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/08/11/theres-probably-no-cod/#comment-342107</link>
		<dc:creator>Greta Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=14939#comment-342107</guid>
		<description>This is freaking hilarious.

And it&#039;s an excellent sign of our progress. If we&#039;re in the public consciousness enough to be parodied, it means we&#039;ve arrived. (That&#039;s more or less what Madonna said about being parodied by Weird Al Yankovic.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is freaking hilarious.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s an excellent sign of our progress. If we&#8217;re in the public consciousness enough to be parodied, it means we&#8217;ve arrived. (That&#8217;s more or less what Madonna said about being parodied by Weird Al Yankovic.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 301/309 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 02:09:06 -->
