<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Would Get the Honor in a New Year Zero?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Pertinent Questions-Learning about History &#171; An Indian kitchen in France</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-372326</link>
		<dc:creator>More Pertinent Questions-Learning about History &#171; An Indian kitchen in France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-372326</guid>
		<description>[...] And while googling about the Gregorian calendar just now, I found a great site called http://friendlyatheist.com/ with an amusing discussion along the lines of the question Indira asked &#8211; http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And while googling about the Gregorian calendar just now, I found a great site called <a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/" rel="nofollow">http://friendlyatheist.com/</a> with an amusing discussion along the lines of the question Indira asked &#8211; <a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/" rel="nofollow">http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manyhats</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-370830</link>
		<dc:creator>manyhats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-370830</guid>
		<description>ChameleonDave, the reason people translate Anno Domini to &quot;in the year of our lord&quot; is that that was the phrase used in English, not because it&#039;s a correct literal translation. While attempting to make yourself look like a Latin scholar you exposed the fact that you don&#039;t read much English literature. In Spanish they use the phrase &quot;En el año de Nuestro Señor&quot; which literally translates to &quot;in the year of our lord&quot; as well.

As for the UNIX Epoch, since less than six percent of computers worldwide use UNIX that might be the wrong choice. &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OS market share&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Microsoft Windows machines (93% market share) use January 1, 1900 as zero. Also arbitrary, but just as valid and requires fewer people to do anything than the UNIX-based date.

Notable atheists in the past have used the the date of the execution of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Giordano Bruno&lt;/a&gt; to adjust the calendar. Although he was burned at the stake on February 17, 1600 we can ignore the day of the year and just shift our calendar&#039;s zero year forward 1600 years. This has the advantage of being easily translatable to the Gregorian system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChameleonDave, the reason people translate Anno Domini to &#8220;in the year of our lord&#8221; is that that was the phrase used in English, not because it&#8217;s a correct literal translation. While attempting to make yourself look like a Latin scholar you exposed the fact that you don&#8217;t read much English literature. In Spanish they use the phrase &#8220;En el año de Nuestro Señor&#8221; which literally translates to &#8220;in the year of our lord&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>As for the UNIX Epoch, since less than six percent of computers worldwide use UNIX that might be the wrong choice. <i><a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8" rel="nofollow">OS market share</a></i> Microsoft Windows machines (93% market share) use January 1, 1900 as zero. Also arbitrary, but just as valid and requires fewer people to do anything than the UNIX-based date.</p>
<p>Notable atheists in the past have used the the date of the execution of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno" rel="nofollow">Giordano Bruno</a> to adjust the calendar. Although he was burned at the stake on February 17, 1600 we can ignore the day of the year and just shift our calendar&#8217;s zero year forward 1600 years. This has the advantage of being easily translatable to the Gregorian system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Datan0de</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365579</link>
		<dc:creator>Datan0de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365579</guid>
		<description>It should absolutely be the UNIX epoch (midnight on 1 January, 1970). The fact that I was born within a week of that moment couldn&#039;t possibly be biasing my opinion. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should absolutely be the UNIX epoch (midnight on 1 January, 1970). The fact that I was born within a week of that moment couldn&#8217;t possibly be biasing my opinion. <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nero Null</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365450</link>
		<dc:creator>Nero Null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365450</guid>
		<description>I think instead of starting at zero and going from there, we should figure out when the universe is going to end and start counting down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think instead of starting at zero and going from there, we should figure out when the universe is going to end and start counting down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnifico</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365112</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnifico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365112</guid>
		<description>March 7th 1973. That&#039;s when time began for me. I don&#039;t count the womb. Still on mom&#039;s clock then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 7th 1973. That&#8217;s when time began for me. I don&#8217;t count the womb. Still on mom&#8217;s clock then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Blue Frog</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365065</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Blue Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365065</guid>
		<description>What about a system based on the precession of equinoxes, or some other predictable, cyclical astronomical event?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a system based on the precession of equinoxes, or some other predictable, cyclical astronomical event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mezzetti</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365025</link>
		<dc:creator>mezzetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365025</guid>
		<description>how about the beginning of earth? sure no one was around for it, but who cares a beginning is a beginning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about the beginning of earth? sure no one was around for it, but who cares a beginning is a beginning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-365007</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-365007</guid>
		<description>I was born in 1983, too! Though I don&#039;t have a sweet blog or a job as a math teacher. I just have a math degree that I&#039;m not really using for anything. You suck, me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born in 1983, too! Though I don&#8217;t have a sweet blog or a job as a math teacher. I just have a math degree that I&#8217;m not really using for anything. You suck, me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazor</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-364974</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-364974</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s going to be in relation to a person, I say needs to be someone who has given a disproportionately large influence or contribution to the advancement of science, such as the aforementioned Galileo, Darwin, or Turing.

If it really were to change, I&#039;d actually go for the first space flight. It would highlight the advances in science we&#039;ve made as a species, and not glorify any one person for the efforts of advancement which has been given by countless individuals.

But realistically, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth the effort. Every piece of writing referencing a date would become incorrect, and everyone would have to learn the conversion. Computers would need updating, etc. etc..
Now, making the change in computers would be simple, but it grows nightmarish when you consider how one human error in implementation could have far-reaching and negative consequences, such as for bank records.

So, I say we keep it as it is. But the foremost reason? 1 A.D. was not the year of Jesus&#039; birth. It serves to highlight how a people who relied on faith over science made a mistake, and remind us how we got where we are: science and reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s going to be in relation to a person, I say needs to be someone who has given a disproportionately large influence or contribution to the advancement of science, such as the aforementioned Galileo, Darwin, or Turing.</p>
<p>If it really were to change, I&#8217;d actually go for the first space flight. It would highlight the advances in science we&#8217;ve made as a species, and not glorify any one person for the efforts of advancement which has been given by countless individuals.</p>
<p>But realistically, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth the effort. Every piece of writing referencing a date would become incorrect, and everyone would have to learn the conversion. Computers would need updating, etc. etc..<br />
Now, making the change in computers would be simple, but it grows nightmarish when you consider how one human error in implementation could have far-reaching and negative consequences, such as for bank records.</p>
<p>So, I say we keep it as it is. But the foremost reason? 1 A.D. was not the year of Jesus&#8217; birth. It serves to highlight how a people who relied on faith over science made a mistake, and remind us how we got where we are: science and reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/09/15/who-would-get-the-honor-in-a-new-year-zero/#comment-364966</link>
		<dc:creator>muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=15875#comment-364966</guid>
		<description>Is there some way to rid myself of this truly hideous avatar that this thing is labelling me with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some way to rid myself of this truly hideous avatar that this thing is labelling me with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/387 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-28 03:26:32 -->
