Comments on: Ray Comfort Tries to Sneak Creationism into On the Origin of Species

By: Atemu1234

Atemu1234 — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:58:00 +0000

True but you must remember, most people would get crap if it was free.

By: darkstar101

darkstar101 — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:56:00 +0000

Offending others never proves a point. Also, I have a nephew in ninth grade. You seriously need to at least try to not act like a uberchristian bigot.

By: Atemu1234

Atemu1234 — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:50:00 +0000

If you believe that bull about evolution being an unproven theory you wouldn’t be believing in the theory of Gravity or the theory of creation as well. Discredit a word it loses meaning in its entirety, as does this wonderful book with that wad of toilet paper in the front of it

By: Jack Hansen

Jack Hansen — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:13:00 +0000

As a good skeptic, I want to see the book for myself. Where can I find a copy of the “revised” Origin of the Species? I respect your approach to this constroversy!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:10:00 +0000

Does this mean there are going to be 50 page introductions to books on geology? Brian

By: Eupraxsophy

Eupraxsophy — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:53:58 +0000

Here’s an even funnier one Bolero.

I was reading this book that says Old Testiment implying testimonies from witnesses and in the first part it says “In the beginning God CREATED Heaven and Earth”, and my thought was; who is the witness to this event? Was it Moses that wrote the Torah? How can it be a testimony if you don’t have a witness?
How can anyone know for certain that is how we came to be?

And as far as Intelligent Design goes, it was proven to be a hoax in a supreme court of law in Dover Pennsylvania to be a substituted name for creationism.

I laugh when some people believe that they were created or designed.

Where’s your proof?

By: Bolero

Bolero — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:16:44 +0000

I read an interesting quote in the National Geographic the other day. “There used to be just one kind of a pollen, then ONE DAY thousands evolved.” I started laughing to myself. “One day they just evolved into something more complex?” I don’t know. Seems like a lot of smart people are parking their common sense in a long-term parking lot. There has to be some positive creative element involved here. How can things just get smarter and better without being programmed, designed or crafted by someone.

By: Eupraxsophy

Eupraxsophy — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:44:52 +0000

In response to Chris Diemel,

What the f*ck are you talking about?
Roy who? Do you mean Ray? As in Ray Comfort?

Am I to believe that you are the only person on this entire blog that got a version of Comfort’s book that isn’t missing any chapters of On the Origins of Species including the introduction?

So you’re an evolution and ecology major. What school do you attend? The school of FOOLS?

So what historical accuracies are there in the Bible? Like a witness that was there when God created Heaven and Earth? These so called biblical scholars think it was Moses. So am I to believe that Moses was there as a witness when God created Heaven and Earth? Why not Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny? There are some questions that can’t be answered because it contradicts itself. Like how can it be a testimony without an actual witness?

Here is something for you to think about truth.
Knowledge and wisdom are the subjects to the nobility of truth, so if thy caution thyself not to be the FOOL yet thy have a boastful tongue, then let it be that which rest upon thy head the Crown of Truth. For the integrity of the wise is found in truth, so where shall it be found in that of the FOOL? And this above all things to thy own self be true.

Truth has no weakness and integrity is it’s strength.

By: IanB

IanB — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:08:24 +0000

I have written a page-by-page counter essay to Comfort’s introduction. It is guaranteed to be both funnier and more factual. If you got a copy of his book, please check out my essay. Darwigin of Species

By: Nathan

Nathan — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:25:33 +0000

I was given this book by a man today walking to class and I was delighted to see Charles Darwin entitled upon the cover. I skimmed the back and cover and started to read the 50 pg.”Special Introduction by Ray Comfort”. I was very interested for the first 15 or so pages but soon I realized that I had been tricked into reading this garbage. This introduction alone proved to be one of the most biased schemed propaganda and I feel dumbfounded for even reading Comforts naive approach of falsifying Mr. Darwin’s work. His intro is not fooling anyone, I knew there had to be some kind of catch to this free book.