It implies that he/she/whoever has a lot of contact with kids. Hopefully it’s just with a church group and not a supposed-to-be secular institution.

Although … not much in Lynchburg is secular.

I’d let the guy build his placards and billboards as big as possible until his house is covered in them. Enjoy it and put it on the web!

Theists don’t realise how funny this stuff is and also how it actually works against them, pointing out how ridiculous their “beliefs” actually are. You can’t beat someone with a billboard over their head, bible in hand and an appropriate quote from the bible to make people convert from religion. We should have more of them on the streets, not less!

Is this commute on a bus? It might be the opportunity to turn to the person next to you and say “Wow, I wonder if all Christians think like that?” Or some other innocuous statement that might prompt them to ask about your philosophy. Small openings like that can start rational dialogs to plant the seeds of reason and skepticism.

If he’s in a private car, he could bring it up around the water cooler at work (if he isn’t afraid of being fired for being a baby eater).

And the extreme response would be to set up a protest in front of his house! I think Penn Gillette nailed it when he said the best response to free speech is more free speech. Nothing would make more ‘mainstream Christians’ cringe than having a nutter like that defending their faith on the evening news.

Unless it is violating local signage codes or zone regulations, there is nothing you can do about it and nothing that you should (or, at least, could) do about it.

It doesn’t necessarily follow that there is nothing that one should do about it. Free speech leaves many avenues open; it only says you can’t use violence (specifically, government) to physically prevent someone from saying something. We’re still free to talk to our neighbors about our concerns and seek voluntary non-coercive solutions. I wouldn’t really recommend it in this case, but it’s definitely an ethically permissible option.

Zone regulations and the like, on the other hand, are an underhanded attempt to attack fundamental rights. They’re written in such a way as to suggest that they aren’t intended to deprive people of their rights (so that they sound harmless in the abstract), but are then selectively enforced to silence opinions of which the rulers disapprove.

Carl Jung once said, “Everything that annoys us about others can help us to understand ourselves.”

This is a great one Richard And true.
The version I learned was, we see in people a reflection of ourselves, what a person hates about another is simply a reflection of something within that we hate about ourselves.

It took me a long time to find the source of anger I had within myself. It always seemed to well up when things were not to my view. I learned do a lot of self reflection to root out the anger. Once I learned to love myself, accept myself for who I am, and evaluate my beliefs, to make sure they were in accordance to the actions I believed were morally correct, most of the things that would drive me to anger became things of humor.
I would suggest a little self reflection To find the root of this anger and deal with that.

Plus, everyone driving by that house probably thinks he’s an idiot.

On a personal note, my evangelical grandmother at one point many years ago purchased one of those big signs businesses use with the flashing arrow and removable letters. She had a large back yard that was directly adjacent to the most busy street in our city, and placed the sign, complete with religious and anti-abortion messages, near the road. It didn’t last long as the city required permits to post any sign along that road and she didn’t have one. Apparently it was too much effort to obtain one because she got rid of the sign and I never saw it again. But as a tween, that brief period was long enough for me to be completely mortified.