<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God is a Voyeur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MoUsY spell-checker</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-396085</link>
		<dc:creator>The MoUsY spell-checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-396085</guid>
		<description>&quot;Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see.&quot;

But weren&#039;t Adam and Eve only naked until they ate the forbidden fruit? Afterwards they realised they were naked and covered up with fig leaves because they were ashamed. So, it&#039;s actually consistent for conservative Christians not to have a problem with Adam and Eve&#039;s nudity because it was before the original sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see.&#8221;</p>
<p>But weren&#8217;t Adam and Eve only naked until they ate the forbidden fruit? Afterwards they realised they were naked and covered up with fig leaves because they were ashamed. So, it&#8217;s actually consistent for conservative Christians not to have a problem with Adam and Eve&#8217;s nudity because it was before the original sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395174</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395174</guid>
		<description>That is something that I have never understood about conservative Christians, particularly those with a creationist bent. Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see. To me those people have always looked like hypocrites in that respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is something that I have never understood about conservative Christians, particularly those with a creationist bent. Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see. To me those people have always looked like hypocrites in that respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Min</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395133</link>
		<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395133</guid>
		<description>As long as we&#039;re being pedantic here, that wouldn&#039;t have been pornography unless it was also obscene and without artistic value.

Maybe it makes me a bad atheist, but I usually find comics like this to be about as witty as most creationist comics.

Which is to say, not at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we&#8217;re being pedantic here, that wouldn&#8217;t have been pornography unless it was also obscene and without artistic value.</p>
<p>Maybe it makes me a bad atheist, but I usually find comics like this to be about as witty as most creationist comics.</p>
<p>Which is to say, not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lagunatic</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lagunatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395125</guid>
		<description>Is this how we ended up with all the oceans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this how we ended up with all the oceans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Clemens</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Clemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395123</guid>
		<description>I always use my &lt;a href=&quot;http://godbg.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;God-B-Gone&lt;/a&gt; when I want some privacy from the Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always use my <a href="http://godbg.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">God-B-Gone</a> when I want some privacy from the Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395115</guid>
		<description>I was this kid. I remember being small and worrying that my guardian angel was watching me in the show. That&#039;s really upsetting for a kid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was this kid. I remember being small and worrying that my guardian angel was watching me in the show. That&#8217;s really upsetting for a kid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beloved Spear</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395052</link>
		<dc:creator>Beloved Spear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395052</guid>
		<description>Sigh.  Just goes to show how contextual humor can be, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.  Just goes to show how contextual humor can be, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CiCi</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-395002</link>
		<dc:creator>CiCi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-395002</guid>
		<description>haha thanks for posting, made me smile =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha thanks for posting, made me smile =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-394947</link>
		<dc:creator>muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-394947</guid>
		<description>Heh.  Kid&#039;s got him there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  Kid&#8217;s got him there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSM_Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/11/12/god-is-a-voyeur/#comment-394932</link>
		<dc:creator>FSM_Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=18248#comment-394932</guid>
		<description>Too funny.  Reminds me of &quot;All Things Dull and Ugly.&quot;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooaGhYFHIzg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny.  Reminds me of &#8220;All Things Dull and Ugly.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooaGhYFHIzg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooaGhYFHIzg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 388/392 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-28 06:35:26 -->
