<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misleading Christian Dating Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/</link>
	<description>by Hemant Mehta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Torpy</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-809715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Torpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-809715</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why not sure why the &quot;True&quot; ad about screening against atheists was was posted.  It&#039;s not now now and never was accurate.  I think this is some spam or third-party ad campaign that threw on the atheist part but True includes both atheist and agnostic for a personal identification, an interest in another person, and as a search term.  The labels these fall under (along with traditional religious beliefs) are &quot;beliefs and values&quot; and &quot;commitment&quot;.  They don&#039;t even have a bias toward religion.  okcupid.com is also awesome and free in case anyone wants a dating site.  But there&#039;s no reason to avoid True, other than the cost and spaminess of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why not sure why the &#8220;True&#8221; ad about screening against atheists was was posted.  It&#8217;s not now now and never was accurate.  I think this is some spam or third-party ad campaign that threw on the atheist part but True includes both atheist and agnostic for a personal identification, an interest in another person, and as a search term.  The labels these fall under (along with traditional religious beliefs) are &#8220;beliefs and values&#8221; and &#8220;commitment&#8221;.  They don&#8217;t even have a bias toward religion.  okcupid.com is also awesome and free in case anyone wants a dating site.  But there&#8217;s no reason to avoid True, other than the cost and spaminess of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martymankins</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-406421</link>
		<dc:creator>martymankins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-406421</guid>
		<description>I wonder after clicking on these ads, do those seeking &quot;true Christians&quot; end up clicking over to something by Rick Warren..  just in case someone&#039;s watching their history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder after clicking on these ads, do those seeking &#8220;true Christians&#8221; end up clicking over to something by Rick Warren..  just in case someone&#8217;s watching their history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Macker</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405969</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Macker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405969</guid>
		<description>Er, most christian women don&#039;t wear crosses unless perhaps they are worried about vampires.    Also, let&#039;s be honest here, there are a hell of a lot of sexy christian chicks.    Did the ads claim they were &quot;good&quot; Christians or just Christians?   

Where did Jesus rail against push up bras?  Didn&#039;t the guy hang out with a hooker, Mary?  Hell, Jesus&#039; mother fucked around on his cuckolded adoptive father.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, most christian women don&#8217;t wear crosses unless perhaps they are worried about vampires.    Also, let&#8217;s be honest here, there are a hell of a lot of sexy christian chicks.    Did the ads claim they were &#8220;good&#8221; Christians or just Christians?   </p>
<p>Where did Jesus rail against push up bras?  Didn&#8217;t the guy hang out with a hooker, Mary?  Hell, Jesus&#8217; mother fucked around on his cuckolded adoptive father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PsiCop</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405599</link>
		<dc:creator>PsiCop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405599</guid>
		<description>An observation that has nothing to do with the religious angle of these ads:

Any time you see an asterisk after the word &quot;free,&quot; as seen in the third image, then you KNOW it cannot really be &quot;free&quot; at all. That asterisk betrays some kind of cost that WILL kick in eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An observation that has nothing to do with the religious angle of these ads:</p>
<p>Any time you see an asterisk after the word &#8220;free,&#8221; as seen in the third image, then you KNOW it cannot really be &#8220;free&#8221; at all. That asterisk betrays some kind of cost that WILL kick in eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lundgren</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405516</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lundgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405516</guid>
		<description>That Christian discipline site has been noted before by Greta Christina.  Talk about repression.

And the &quot;good Christian girls&quot; is an overrated cliche, anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Christian discipline site has been noted before by Greta Christina.  Talk about repression.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;good Christian girls&#8221; is an overrated cliche, anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405444</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405444</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re forgetting that most Christians are hypocrites when it comes to sex. The very thing they rail against is the thing they want the most. The slutty virgin is exactly what these sites are intentionally trying to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re forgetting that most Christians are hypocrites when it comes to sex. The very thing they rail against is the thing they want the most. The slutty virgin is exactly what these sites are intentionally trying to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXatheist</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405404</link>
		<dc:creator>TXatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405404</guid>
		<description>Boys will be boys(it&#039;s evolutionary) and I can&#039;t say all the ladies at UU are drop dead hot but some are just like in a xian church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boys will be boys(it&#8217;s evolutionary) and I can&#8217;t say all the ladies at UU are drop dead hot but some are just like in a xian church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lagunatic</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405250</link>
		<dc:creator>Lagunatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405250</guid>
		<description>I smell a key party at the CDD Christmas get together!!!
I wonder if everyone gets a paddle for their Kris Kringle gifts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a key party at the CDD Christmas get together!!!<br />
I wonder if everyone gets a paddle for their Kris Kringle gifts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Weyer</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Weyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405156</guid>
		<description>Little John,
Um, well, this wasn&#039;t discoverd by any, er, untoward interest. It was sent by another preacher friend of mine as a joke. Pretty messed up, yeah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little John,<br />
Um, well, this wasn&#8217;t discoverd by any, er, untoward interest. It was sent by another preacher friend of mine as a joke. Pretty messed up, yeah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/03/misleading-christian-dating-ads/#comment-405153</link>
		<dc:creator>littlejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19035#comment-405153</guid>
		<description>Wow. Are we sure that&#039;s not a Poe?
Well, of course we aren&#039;t. Poe&#039;s law and so forth.
If that&#039;s not a Poe, it is really, seriously fucked up. I thought I looked at kinky shit online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Are we sure that&#8217;s not a Poe?<br />
Well, of course we aren&#8217;t. Poe&#8217;s law and so forth.<br />
If that&#8217;s not a Poe, it is really, seriously fucked up. I thought I looked at kinky shit online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/310 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-14 06:33:36 -->
