Comments on: New Banner http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/ by Hemant Mehta Mon, 28 May 2012 12:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: unique.smile.within http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413254 unique.smile.within Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:46:27 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413254 I think it's great. I like it better than the last one. I think it’s great. I like it better than the last one.

]]> By: Laura http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413231 Laura Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:38:48 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413231 I like it. I dont think it is too unclear as a banner because you have it written out underneath in plain font. It makes it look like a cool design and then you understand later what it is. I like it. I dont think it is too unclear as a banner because you have it written out underneath in plain font. It makes it look like a cool design and then you understand later what it is.

]]> By: Vas http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413203 Vas Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:45:08 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413203 No No No I do not like it at all, particularly for a web site. This is bad design, very self conscious, tortured, and overworked, and it accomplishes nothing. Maybe if taken as a tattoo design, a notorious refuge for bad design and poor quality artists, it could pass but as a graphic exercise it fails. Being barely legible does not force a viewer to look more carefully, in fact the more likely result is to make them click away. But hey it's your site so do what you like. however the notion that this is "cleaner" is way off base. No No No
I do not like it at all, particularly for a web site. This is bad design, very self conscious, tortured, and overworked, and it accomplishes nothing. Maybe if taken as a tattoo design, a notorious refuge for bad design and poor quality artists, it could pass but as a graphic exercise it fails. Being barely legible does not force a viewer to look more carefully, in fact the more likely result is to make them click away. But hey it’s your site so do what you like. however the notion that this is “cleaner” is way off base.

]]> By: BathTub http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413193 BathTub Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:23:53 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413193 No sorry, it's one of the less clear ambigrams I have seen. Not really great for a title banner. No sorry, it’s one of the less clear ambigrams I have seen. Not really great for a title banner.

]]> By: Dan Covill http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413187 Dan Covill Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:16:11 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413187 Nope. I read all the rave reviews, and looked again, and it still sucks. Just what is it you're trying to accomplish with it, anyway? Nope. I read all the rave reviews, and looked again, and it still sucks. Just what is it you’re trying to accomplish with it, anyway?

]]> By: MH http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413182 MH Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:10:55 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413182 I don't care for the ambigram either, but my eyesight isn't that great so when I look at it I keep thinking its me. I don’t care for the ambigram either, but my eyesight isn’t that great so when I look at it I keep thinking its me.

]]> By: Gibbette http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413110 Gibbette Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:33:19 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413110 Oh, I love it! Very nice! Oh, I love it! Very nice!

]]> By: David D.G. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413088 David D.G. Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:29:49 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413088 I still don't care for the ambigram as a banner (for reasons I gave earlier), but I'm obviously outvoted. (And I have to admit that an ambigram would be a really cool aspect to have in a tattoo.) Besides, Hemant, it's <strong><em>your</em></strong> blog --- so by all means, have it adorned however you like. ~David D.G. I still don’t care for the ambigram as a banner (for reasons I gave earlier), but I’m obviously outvoted. (And I have to admit that an ambigram would be a really cool aspect to have in a tattoo.) Besides, Hemant, it’s your blog — so by all means, have it adorned however you like.

~David D.G.

]]> By: Joseph R http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413046 Joseph R Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:38:27 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413046 Impressive. I like it. Impressive. I like it.

]]> By: Jennifer http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2009/12/21/new-banner/#comment-413031 Jennifer Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:44:19 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=19660#comment-413031 That is impressive! That is impressive!

]]>