‘Kind Atheist’ Church Sign Battle

(In response to this post.)

"GW1: I don't think you help our side by continuing to use this language "clump ..."

Christian: Pro-Choice Tim Kaine Can’t Possibly ..."
"Sorry, I don't follow. Could you elaborate, please?"

Priest Faces Backlash After His Book ..."
"When the imaginary doesn't work...they roll up their sleeves and start flinging poo in the ..."

Proposed NM Science Standards Omit References ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Kyle Anderson

    Clearly both signs are equally ridiculous because we all know God doesn’t exist.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Leithiser/593361421 Chris Leithiser

    A rational god worthy of worship would have that preference.  There’s no evidence for such a god, alas, and most Christian denominations don’t seem to worship a rational god.

  • http://squeakysoapbox.com/ Rich Wilson

    Nice start, but are you trying to re-create 
    http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/dogheaven.asp ?  It could be a funny debate.

  • Anonymous

    Just a heads up: the “in response to this post” link is broken. Looks like it’s got an 05 where it should have an 06.

  • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/ Hemant Mehta

    Fixed. Thanks!

  • Renshia

    Ha ha, that was good thanks.

  • Antfaber

    The one on the left has 2 crosses, so it wins.