You can be skeptical and friendly at the same time.
Follow Patheos Atheist:
(via The Atheist Pig)
Hemant Mehta is the editor of Friendly Atheist, appears on the Atheist Voice channel on YouTube, and co-hosts the uniquely-named Friendly Atheist Podcast. You can read much more about him here.
Bravo! That’ll do, pig.
When I was a Christian one of the things I was troubled about the most was the conflicting nature of God vis-a-vis the Old Testament vs the New. The Old Testament God was cruel, murderous, petty and vain while the New Testament God–represented by Jesus–was forgiving, kind, loving, etc. But yet Jesus himself supposedly said that he and the Father are one. How does one reconcile such two opposing visions of God? Doesn’t that make God schizophrenic? How do you reconcile a God who says “Kill everyone in that city!” in the Old Testament with Jesus saying “Love your enemies” in the New? It made no sense to me. It was like talking about 2 totally different Gods. When I would express my doubts my fellow church members would say, “We are to focus on Jesus. His example is the one we must follow.” Ok, but that didn’t answer the question. I found that Christians are very reluctant to talk about the cruelty of the Old Testament God and either ignore what he did or make excuses for it–i.e. “God really didn’t mean that Moses should have had EVERYONE killed. Moses just THOUGHT that was what God wanted.” Seriously, I was told that. Or “Moses HAD to slaughter all the >fill in the blank< because they were so wicked and disease ridden that had anyone been allowed to live it would have destroyed the Hebrew nation." And when all else fails there was always: "We are not to question God's ways." Like it or not Christians are stuck with the Old Testament. They both love it and hate it. But for me the Old Testament was one of my major reasons for rejecting Christianity. I could not worship a God who was a monster.
Apparently the OT wasn’t selling that well, so they wrote the NT with hippie jebus to attract at least some public.
Enough with the sequels, maybe it is time for a ‘reboot’ to the series.
My favourite philosophical conundrum: If Gos id omnipotent, could he lift a rock so large that hitting himself in the head with it could explain the difference in personality he underwent between the OT and the NT?
near the end of the Power of Myth series, (late 80s, MS-DOS days) Joseph Campbell tells Bill Moyers:
My computer is like an Old Testament God. Lots of rules and no mercy
Like the New Testament is anything any moral person could possibly condone. Love Jesus or burn forever… yeah some great morality there. I guess we should all be praising abusive partners throughout the land for their Jesus like behaviour. I mean if those abused people would just love their partners more then maybe they wouldn’t suffer so.
It was like talking about 2 totally different Gods.
But of course, they are two different gods. One religion morphed into another, and a new god was invented. This has happened countless times over history. The extreme dissonance in the case of Christianity is its unusual need to preserve the writings of the older religion as scripture. Most new religions just throw out the old stuff, or keep it around in some arcane form, not taken very seriously. Or the old god simply becomes a lesser god.
What is bizarre about Christianity is that when the apocalyptic Jewish cults and people like Paul were inventing their new God, they forgot to get rid of the old one. And by choosing to remain monotheistic, that introduced an intractable problem.
Marcion noticed that contradiction in the 2nd century already and proposed a dualistic belief system with the OT god being a separate being. Of course he was declared a heretic for that
Exactly. The Old Testament God only killed you. The New Testament God keeps you in some perpetual existing state so you can be tortured for all eternity. I’ll take the Old Testament God in choosing between the two.
They don’t think it’s evil. They think it’s just. They think everyone got what they deserved in the Old Testament. All the rape and murder and genocide and oppression. Those were good things, done by a just, good God.
What the early followers of Jesus should have done was to start a whole new religion altogether. But yet, they needed the Old Testament to “prove” that Jesus was the coming Messiah. (You know, the whole “born of a virgin in Bethlehem” thing.) So they were stuck with have a raving loon God as “‘The Father” and decided that he and Jesus were the same God yet different. And then they threw in the Holy Spirit as yet ANOTHER God who was seperate but equal into a mix they called “The Trinity.” To this day no one has ever explained to me how you can have 3 seperate Gods who are really ONE God. No wonder Christianity is so F’##ked up.
They would have been better off creating an original deity – Yahweh has too much baggage.
But staring from scratch would have meant other problems. Who is Jesus the son of? Never heard of him.
Think hard before launching your own religion. Leveraging pre-existing work may give you the boost you need and help keep things familiar, but it does come with strings attached.
The image consultant did a good job with the makeover, shame they didn’t over write the OT with the NT, or wipe the memory!
You mean like Mormonism?
To this day no one has ever explained to me how you can have 3 seperate Gods who are really ONE God.
Because it’s unexplainable. Apologists have spent the last 2000 years playing word games to make sense of it all, and that’s all it is- games. The concept is utterly absurd, and there’s no getting around that.
There actually was an attempt at this in early Christian history. Marcion of Sinope had his following who believed that the god of the Old Testament was a lesser and lower god than the “true god” of the new testament. Jesus is the son of this god, not of Yahweh.
I think the Book of Mormon is more like fan fiction.
That’s interesting stuff. I like learning about the history of how religions came to be, and what they might have been.
People who believe their stories are non-fiction are missing out on all sorts of things! (Watch once for the story, once again with the commentary track on.)
Torturing and executing someone else to have your faults forgiven is also extremely immoral
Interestingly, the concept of the Trinity is not actually in the bible. It was kind-of added in suplemental materials by theologians. When you are in the business of making things up, you are only limited by your imagination.
And, of course, we’re completely ignoring Jesus own speech about ” I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household.” Who was that, his separated at birth twin?
And assuming that God is perfect, the torture you receive will be perfect. An eternity of perfect agony. For committing a sin that he condemned you to in the first place. But he loves you.
But it’s OK that he’s a petty, genocidal maniac because he’s God.
I gave your comment a “like” because you quoted Joseph Campbell. More people should.
That’s kind of like saying that the 19th century United States and the 20th century United States are two different countries. It’s true in some sense, and untrue in other senses.
That’s because the notion of the Trinity is inherently paradoxical. Even that most exalted of thinkers, Thomas Aquinas, thought that the concept would only be explicable at the beatific vision (IIRC).
I think that’s a poor analogy. A country is a human construct; you’d expect it to change with time. The Abrahamic god is presented as a perfect being. How can it change at all, let alone as radically as we see between the OT and NT? In the case of a country, it’s the same country, but its culture has changed, that’s all. That doesn’t help in understanding the absurdity of a dualistic god (or worse, the Trinity).
I’m withholding my Like until Rich fixes the link!
Damned Disqus. Work of Satan I tell you!
I think there’s a fair bit of nuance.
I think you have a troll killer there, just ask them to explain the trinity, or this god-Jesus thing, how does it work exactly?
The William Lane Craig school of barbarism
The folks in OT are more like little children that are uneducated that needs literal instructions while in NT folks are generally better educated need less literal instruction.
As I see it, everything is God’s plan good and evil; if there are no conflict and challenges there would be no need for God. Hence God allowed conflict and perhaps created conflict so that we we have a need for God.
Afterall, where would be the fun in having robots worship at your feet? You would want an independent mind to willingly submit to your will and worship you and depend on you for every need. If I were GOD, then this I would do; afterall I created everything it is my divine right.
In what way?
God’s love is nuanced by hate, perhaps nuanced isn’t the right word, how about consumed by. Must be hard when you think about it, a perfect being, yet his greatest accomplishment turned out to be an almost complete failure.
OIC. Well, to be fair we don’t know that this planet is his greatest accomplishment. We could just be food for a far greater race of beings that are on their way and will require a snack on their pilgrimage to a meeting with Him.
Maybe organised religion is just His way of keeping us busy while they make the journey. Maybe that’s why so many religious people are keen on annointing with oils; it’s to keep our skin nice and crispy. Maybe we should switch to BBQ sauce in Jesus’ name.
But I digress.
God created conflict so we would have a need for him? Do you not find that a bit malicious? Why would the creator of the universe have a need to be worshiped by our particular species on this planet on the edge of one galaxy out of billions? I sure hope he cuts other civilizations that may be out there some slack.
The whole story seems to me to be that Jesus came to save us from God. That makes sense. But then they throw in that he is God… and he saves us by getting killed… but…
I realized a horrible thing about the Heaven/Hell myth.
Folks in Heaven, however…that’s actually worse. It’s not like the big guy hasn’t kicked people out of Heaven before, right?
Which means he can do it again, and given infinite time WILL do it again, eventually to everyone in Heaven. I’d rather have Hell and be done with it rather than an eternity on pins and needles.
I’ve always thought Jesus and the OT God were the antithesis of one another .. and whaddaya know this Marcion actually wrote something called Antithesis about this very notion. I always summed it up to the OT God actually being a Satan like figure and from what I’ve skimmed through so far [ on your link and then some more places] this Marcion fellow basically thought that too — except he credited the OT God [Yahweh] with creation and sin and didn’t junk the works of the OT. He considered them to historical texts to be taken literally and didn’t think Jesus [Isu Crestos as he called him] came as the Christ for the Jews but for the rest of the world and that the Jewish messiah would come at a later time. This rings of the recent Evangelical Baptists belief , except ironically they practically worship Jews and Israel whereas this guy wasn’t too keen on the Judaizers. But neither was Paul and I guess that’s why this Marcion liked him so much. Again ironic being that Paul was an uber Jew before being knocked off his donkey or w/e happened to him. I guess maybe this Marcion and Paul were just all the way or no way type of people. I guess they won’t have to worry about being spewed from their Gods mouth for being luke warm.
My Heavenly Father, & His Son, Jesus are not nor have they ever been evil. Jesus died for everyone, to give them the choice of weather to accept Him as there personal Savior & Lord and live one day with Him forever. Or you have the choice to reject Him, and you go to hell. God does not send people to hell, they choose to go by not accepting the free gift of Salvation, that Jesus paid the full price so no one would go to hell. Christians are to love, because love is of God, and God is love! Jesus paid a dept that He did not owe, because we owed a dept that we could never pay. don,t make fun of my Heavenly Father or Jesus my Savior & Lord. One day your knees will bow & your tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the Glory of the Father. And you will wish that you had believed and lived & trusted Jesus. But when it,s too late, it,s too late!
to give them the choice
One day your knees will bow & your tongue confess
The fact that you don’t see the obvious contradiction here blows my mind.
God does not send people to hell, they choose to go by not accepting the free gift of Salvation
An abusive spouses don’t hit their victim. Their victim chooses to get hit by not accepting the abuser’s gift of true love.
Interesting that Jesus never uses the Jewish name for the OT God but talks about one called Father God. He uses every chance he gets to refute OT teaching and tells the religious leaders of his day they worship Satan
I tell you, you fuckin atheists talk about god more than the religious freaks do! It’s like you numb nuts are more obsessed with what other people believe in than what your own beliefs are…..maybe one of you champions can start I DONT BELIEVE IN BIGFOOT, BUT LETS GO BACK AND FORTH ABOUT PEOPLE WHO DO forum!!
Follow Patheos on