Atheist Plans to Come Out at Prayerful Town Council Meeting but Gets Thwarted…

First: I know Michael Cluff through my mother and stepfather, who attended the same Unitarian Universalist church in South Jersey, a fairly conservative area of an otherwise blue state. Michael’s an atheist, and once introduced, he’s been in my circle of interwebs heathens. He’s been doing most of his online heresy under pseudonyms, as he’s felt the need to keep his atheism a secret to many in his community. Not everyone, as he is on the record as coordinator for the South Jersey Humanists. But still, his atheism has been on the down-low.

Second: Where Michael lives, and where I used to, Galloway Township, NJ, there has been a kerfuffle over prayer at township council meetings. As you can imagine, the council wants to keep up doing the God thing, and people who get why church-state separation is a good thing don’t. Even the major local paper, the rather conservative Press of Atlantic City, opposed the prayers at council meetings.

Michael decided to do something rather brave to fight on the side of reason, and he went to last night’s council meeting to out himself as an atheist and ask the council to vote down further prayer activity at council meetings.

Unbeknownst to him, though, the council voted on whether or not to continue to prayers before they allowed anyone to speak, and Michael never got his chance. (And yeah, they voted to keep on a-prayin’.)

I think he deserves the credit for what he intended to do, though. South Jersey is not a hospitable place for nonbelief in the way, say, the Metro-NYC area of North Jersey is. To make his crucial point about the exclusion of nontheists and minority religions, he was willing to put himself on the line in public. Last night, Michael posted the statement he would have given to the council on the South Jersey Humanists Facebook page, and I got his permission to repost it here. Thanks, Michael.

My name is Michael Cluff, and I’m from Galloway. It’s not easy to come out as an atheist in public, and especially here in Galloway. But I felt I had to comment on the motion to have prayer before these meetings.

I know, I probably don’t have a prayer here. Though I’m not in the majority, I know quite a few Galloway unbelievers. And we’re different from the angry stereotype. We’re good citizens of the community, raising our kids, paying our taxes, doing good works.

For a moment, I respectfully hope to show you a different perspective. In my view, the issue isn’t whether it’s legal to do this. It’s whether you should do this.

What we’re asking you to remember that when you pray here, you are praying as a public official.

Whether you intend to or not, when you use your role as a government official to pray, you’re sending a message. You’re suggesting that “believers are more equal than others.” You’re telling me I’m not really a citizen.

I’m not just talking about atheists and agnostics. Please keep in mind that not everyone in your town believes in the single, male god that appears in your approved prayers. With these prayers you’re telling those who go to the Galloway’s Hindu Jain temple — I don’t represent you. You’re telling those who go to Galloway’s Unitarian Universalist congregation: You aren’t really a resident here.

You might not mean to say this. You may feel it’s an innocent expression of personal faith. But you would be using your position of power in a way that excludes those who don’t share your beliefs.

Even worse, you would be doing your own religion a disservice, as you would be reinforcing the stereotype of Christians as hostile to other beliefs. And you’d be forgetting what Jesus said in Matthew 6:5:

“And whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, so that they may be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward. But whenever you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.”

Imagine an alternate universe with a town council run by atheists. Before every meeting, they recite a passage saying that we can only rely on ourselves and one another because God doesn’t exist. (Of course, they made sure the statement didn’t mention a specific god to make sure they could avoid “nuisance lawsuits.”) Even though I’m an atheist, I know that would be wrong.

So why not keep a moment of silence? That way everyone could gather strength and muster their faith in their own way. The only ones who wouldn’t be happy with that are those who are trying to use the government to advance a specific religion.

We all walk together as Americans: Christians, Jews, Hindus, Muslims, agnostics, atheists, wiccans, Unitarian Univeralists. Why shut us out like this?


About Paul Fidalgo

Paul is communications director for the Center for Inquiry, as well as an actor and musician. His personal blog is Near-Earth Object, and he tweets as @paulfidalgo. He is the author of a short (and cheap!) Kindle book on the atheist political movement, Under the Stained Glass Ceiling: Atheists' Precarious Place in Modern American Politics.

  • http://friendlyatheist.com Richard Wade

    Acknowledging the risks that Michael has carefully and admirably considered, I do not see why his message should not still be presented publicly to the town council at a council meeting. He could make the same eloquent and compelling statement, but now the only difference is instead of saying essentially “Please don’t do this,” he would be saying “Please stop doing this.”

    He has not been thwarted. The fact that the city council has voted privately and presented the prayer policy as a fait accompli only changes Michael’s message from an appeal to do the right thing to a protest to stop doing the wrong thing.

    • Craig

      I was wondering this myself. Why not present his statement anyway. It could have been a stinging rebuttal to the vote result.

    • http://profiles.google.com/michael.cluff Michael Cluff

      That’s a great suggestion, and am definitely considering doing just so.

      • http://friendlyatheist.com Richard Wade

        Michael, to be very clear, I greatly admire what you planned to do, and I don’t fault you at all if a reassessment of the situation brings you to change your mind. My admiration will remain undiminished. This kind of thing is certainly not easy, and we should never be blithe or casual about expecting someone else to take an unpopular stand on our behalf.

        • http://profiles.google.com/michael.cluff Michael Cluff

          Understood and appreciated! For sure, I took your comment as encouragement.

          • Longbowgun

            As I wander the intrawebs I run across this old post and wonder what – if anything – has been the result. If you have yet to take action I say, “Go for it!”

  • Shanti

    I used to live in Mays Landing. At that time, I would have given anything to know that there were others who though as I do. Now I know!!

  • Vision_From_Afar

    Excellent and well-written speech.

  • http://counterapologist.blogspot.com/ Counter Apologist

    Kind of unrelated to the main story, but that’s an organization that’s in my area! Thanks for the link!

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GodVlogger?feature=mhee GodVlogger (on YouTube)

    Sometimes it is worth remembering that southern New Jersey actually falls below the Mason-Dixon line.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.zamecki.7 Joe Zamecki

    Gotta say something! Very important.

  • Joseph

    You don’t need to go to South Jersey or the Deep South to find religious fundamentalists though. There are plenty of fundamentalists still right here in the heart of the NYC metro area. I live in Kearny, NJ (About 7 mi. from NYC) and I am a closeted atheist in a fundamentalist family who are members of a church in Kearny. Also, if you remember headlines from a few years ago my one of the High School Teachers in Kearny (who I had when I was at the high school, but I was still a Christian at the time.) preached in class for years without reprimand This was also the subject of a documentary I believe.

    • allein

      I live in central NJ and I don’t see a lot of fundamentalism in my area (though I used to pass a church on my way to work that I referred to as “crazy fundy church” based on their connection to a website called njbiblescience.org). I tend to think of NJ as a relatively secular place and then I always remember the Kearny teacher story and I think maybe I’m just lucky to run in relatively secular circles.

  • http://bsoi.st/ bsoist

    Small world. We moved to Galloway Township when I was in 8th grade (1980). I went to Pilgrim Academy.

  • ecolt

    Bravo, Michael! I agree that you should still find a way to present this statement to the council. It’s powerful, honest and well-stated. I always love when people use Matthew 6:5 against the Bible-thumpers. So I say present it to the council and submit it as an editorial to your local newspaper. Your words deserve to be heard. Even if they fall on deaf ears among the council members, your statement would certainly be appreciated by other nervous unbelievers in your area, and those of non-Christian faiths who feel similarly excluded by the council’s prayers. And such well-reasoned and honest words may even find you supporters among the more moderate Christians who don’t like the way their religion is being pushed.

  • KxBirds

    I like some of it, but other parts are too apologetic. I’ve been a resident of Galloway and Mullica Townships since 1970.
    I think it would be more realistic/factual to say, in the tenth paragraph: “As a reasoning human being, it would not be wrong to recite a passage saying that we can only rely on ourselves and one another because there is no evidence that any gods exist.”
    Also, the 8th & 9th paragraphs baselessly imply or concede that the New Testament account is fact. It would be more reasonable to say “And you’d be forgetting what the Christian mythology quotes the character Jesus saying in Matthew 6:5…”


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X