5th Grader Told He Can’t Take Part in Speech Contest Because His Essay Mentions the Harm Caused by Religion

5th grader Zachary Golob-Drake was supposed to deliver a speech to his fellow 4th and 5th grade classmates yesterday morning. It wasn’t just any speech. It was a speech that was chosen to be the best in his class and Thursday morning was his chance to win a spot as one of the representatives to the regional 4-H Tropicana Public Speech contest.

That glory came to a sudden halt on Wednesday when the assistant principal at USF/Patel Partnership Elementary School in Tampa, Florida pulled Zachary aside to tell him he would have to rewrite his speech or drop out of the contest.

Zachary Golob-Drake holding his first place ribbon

Why? Because Zachary’s speech was all about how religious extremism has hurt humanity and how we’d all be better off following the Golden Rule (like Jesus and Muhammad wanted, he added):

But Golob-Drake says the assistant principal pulled him aside before school was dismissed and told him his speech was inappropriate.

“She started talking to me about how she thought my speech wasn’t appropriate for 4th and 5th graders and she thought that probably I would have to rewrite my speech, take the religion out or not compete.”

“She said to me probably the fairest thing to do is to take your ribbon,” he said, noting that he then got emotional.

By the end of the night, the school decided to postpone the contest until Monday. In the meantime, parents of 4th and 5th graders will receive permission slips. The form will list all of the speech titles and let parents decide whether or not they want their children to hear Golob-Drake’s speech or any of the other speeches.

That’s a complicated way to handle an otherwise simple situation. Zachary isn’t trashing religion in the speech. He’s just saying that some people use it for evil and they shouldn’t do that. Even theists could get on board with him.

School District Spokeswoman Tanya Arja said school officials told her that the controversy wasn’t about the religious aspect.

“The concern was over the topic of mass murders,” Arja said. “Because these are 4th and 5th graders.”

That’s the concern? The kids who have probably played Grand Theft Auto and have seen an untold number of movies with violence in them can’t handle listening to a speech about world history because it’s too real? (Mind you, Zachary says in the speech that mass murder is wrong.) If you can’t talk honestly and openly about the motivations of conquerors, doesn’t that pretty much put a stop to all of the school’s history classes, too?

And why didn’t anyone bring this up when he won the award in his class?

You can read the speech for yourself below. See how offensive you find it:

In the Name of Religion

The world’s major religions all have messages about coexisting. But oftentimes people have found a way to bend that rule; sometimes people even use religion as an excuse to take each other’s lives. The three major religions on the earth include the Eastern religions, Islam, and Christianity. About one billion people live by the Eastern religions; about 1.4 billion are Muslim; and about 2.3 billion are Christians. Religious differences have always sparked conflict, even leading to warfare and mass murder.

One of the most famous tensions is the Crusades. Beginning in 1065, the Crusades were a series of holy wars which were fought between Christians and Muslims. It was the head of the Catholic Church, Pope Urban II who initiated the first wave of attacks. The European Christian’s intent was to force Christianity upon the Muslim people and to win back the Holy Land, known as Jerusalem. They were some of the bloodiest wars ever fought.

In 1162, about the time the Crusades ended, Genghis Khan was born and later crowned Emperor of Mongolia. Khan was a powerful ruler who conquered many lands and civilizations, which inevitably caused the Mongolian Empire to grow. Khan became so powerful that people considered him a god. Khan was known to tell his victims before causing their deaths, “I am the flail of God; for if you were without sin, he would not have sent me upon you.”

For anyone who thinks religious tensions have ended, they have not. Modern terrorism often has to do with religion. Take the story of 911, for example. On September 11, 2001, hijackers commandeered two jets and intentionally crashed them into the Twin Towers in New York, killing thousands of unsuspecting civilians. It has been confirmed that the hijackers were Islamic extremists who wanted to punish the United States for its immoral behavior.

Religion provides moral guidance for most of the seven billion people on the earth. More than 2,500 years ago, Confuscious offered guidance through the Golden Rule when he said, “Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you.” Both Jesus and Muhammad echoed these sentiments hundreds of years later. This world would be a better place if everybody followed that rule.

That’s one 5th grader who’s wise beyond his years.

Again: Administrators didn’t claim he was wrong or inaccurate, only that they didn’t want him mentioning mass murders… even though condemning them is integral to his piece.

The controversy wasn’t about religion, Arja said, yet it was the religion part of his speech that Zachary was told to remove.

Totally makes sense…

Well, here’s what I say to that:

Zachary’s being punished for doling out some harsh facts. He’s not insulting the followers of Christianity or Islam; rather, he’s admitting that most believers live moral, ethical lives because of their faith. There’s nothing offensive about this speech at all.

The school’s going overboard in an attempt to assuage over-sensitive parents. Administrators need to let Zachary compete with the current version of his essay. He worked hard on it, he didn’t say anything untrue, and his argument is a very important one. Even elementary school students understand the Golden Rule. There’s no reason they should be “protected” from the truth about history.

(Thanks to Brian for the link)

About Hemant Mehta

Hemant Mehta is the editor of Friendly Atheist, appears on the Atheist Voice channel on YouTube, and co-hosts the uniquely-named Friendly Atheist Podcast. You can read much more about him here.

  • Wildcard

    Why you just hate Mutants with eyebeams don’t you! I bet you supported Kelley didn’t you anti- mutitite!

  • Bruce Martin

    So a school in Florida says that you can’t say that there were mass murders in history. Should we be surprised that their school is apparently run by holocaust deniers? I don’t think that’s what Governor Charlie Crist would have done.

  • Anathema

    I’m sure that the assistant principle was more concerned with the topic of mass murder being talked about from one child to a bunch of children at a school. I’m sure a large majority of people wouldn’t want their children being involved in that without their consent.

    When I was in fifth grade, my teacher divided our class up into several small groups. Each group was given copies of a book on a different famous explorer to read. After we’d read the books, each group was supposed to give a presentation to the rest of the class on what they’d learned.

    I don’t remember what explorers the other groups got, but I remember the explorer that my group was assigned. It was Hernán Cortés. It is pretty much impossible to discuss Cortés and the conquest of Mexico without mentioning any instances of mass murder.

    Do you think that my fifth grade teacher was behaving inappropriately? Do you really think most people would object to my teacher having required kids to participate in these group reports without having the parents sign a permission slip first?

    To address the ignorant rant about violent video games and t.v. That was completely irrelevant; most 12 year old kids aren’t exposed to that stuff yet.

    For the most part, 12-year-olds are not playing video games which graphically depict the effects of violence. But even games that don’t depict violence in that manner frequently involve trying to kill enemies, so its not like the kids are completely ignorant and need to be shielded from the very idea of one human being killing another. I would be absolutely stunned if there was a single child at that school who had not come across depictions of violence more graphic than the ones mentioned in this 5th grader’s speech. After all, the speech doesn’t describe instances of violence so much as it just mentions the fact that they exist.

    Some have bad parents and are playing gta v and cussing online.

    So the only reason that a 12-year-old kid might have been exposed to violent video games, movies, and television is because they have bad parents? And you can judge the quality of a 12-year-old’s parents based on whether or not their child has used cuss words online? Really?

    Children are individuals. Different individuals mature at different rates. Some kids can handle depictions of violence better than others. When a parent allows their kid to play a violent video game or watch a violent t.v. show, it might be because they know their own child is mature enough to handle it.

    This was an attack on religion, that only occurred because the media reported it.

    Did you actually read the kid’s speech? It wasn’t an attack on religion at all. It was an attack on violence done in the name of religion. Surely you can tell the difference between the two?

    You people are blowing things out of proportion to enrage your viewers into disbelieving in the institution of religion. Religion is fundamentally a great thing, but bad people twist it into a perverse way to put down others; exactly like the writer of this article.

    An article about how school officials have forbidden a fifth grader from taking part in a speech contest because he wrote a speech that talks about how religions are twisted to justify violence in spite of the good moral guidelines they offer is itself an example of twisting religion in order to put down others? How does that work?

  • Artor

    “She said to me probably the fairest thing to do is to take your ribbon,”

    This line alone makes me despair for humanity.

  • Artor

    No doubt, the self-righteous ass. principal went to church over the weekend, and talked to children about the story of Noah, or Exodus. But it’s wrong to mention mass-murder to kids.

    Yes, I deliberately abbreviated “assistant.” I thought it was appropriate.

  • fed up

    This is a serious problem. as hard as one tries, one cannot separate church and state. This is another perfect example of why organized religion is dangerous. A vice principal, in what I believes a public school, is prohibiting free speech. I ask, how many more law suits have to be filed and how much more of the tax payers money has to be wasted on these arguments? Until public officials can separate their fantasy beliefs from the duties they are charged with performing, we will continue to see these unnecessary disputes. Again tell me why religion isn’t harmful?

  • 3lemenope

    …he said, noting that he then got emotional.

    That’s the part that got me. Regardless of what a person believes, as an adult if you care enough about your beliefs to do something so insensitive to a ten-year-old (as self-possessed as this one) that it predictably makes them either rage out or cry, you are the asshole in the situation, full stop.

    I hate bullies.

  • Little_Magpie

    Helen Keller was pretty damn awesome. IMHO.