Supreme Court: There is a Right to Marriage Equality

The Supreme Court finally capped off what LGBT activists and allies have been working toward for decades.

The four liberal justices along with Justice Kennedy said today that marriage equality is a right for everyone:

Excluding same-sex couples from marriage thus conflicts with a central premise of the right to marry. Without the recognition, stability, and predictability marriage offers, their children suffer the stigma of knowing their families are somehow lesser. They also suffer the significant material costs of being raised by unmarried parents, relegated through no fault of their own to a more difficult and uncertain family life. The marriage laws at issue here thus harm and humiliate the children of same-sex couples.

This dynamic also applies to same-sex marriage. It is now clear that the challenged laws burden the liberty of same-sex couples, and it must be further acknowledged that they abridge central precepts of equality. Here the marriage laws enforced by the respondents are in essence unequal: same-sex couples are denied all the benefits afforded to opposite-sex couples and are barred from exercising a fundamental right. Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry.

The respondents have not shown a foundation for the conclusion that allowing same-sex marriage will cause the harmful outcomes they describe. Indeed, with respect to this asserted basis for excluding same-sex couples from the right to marry, it is appropriate to observe these cases involve only the rights of two consenting adults whose marriages would pose no risk of harm to themselves or third parties.

Kennedy emphasized that anti-gay religious bigots can continue bigoting:

it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered… The Constitution, however, does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex.

Oh, screw it. I’m done quoting for now. Go celebrate.

"You all in Texas have been passing laws that take away choices for some time ..."

Here’s Why the Fertility Clinic “Dilemma” ..."
"Texas Teen Abortion Rate Increased After Cuts to Planned Parenthood FundingEven though lawmakers were aiming ..."

Here’s Why the Fertility Clinic “Dilemma” ..."
"I had tickets to see him speak in Los Angeles, but shortly before the date ..."

In Honor of Christopher Hitchens, Six ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment