Atheist Group Files Lawsuit Against War Memorial Cross in Santa Clara (CA) Public Park April 21, 2016

Atheist Group Files Lawsuit Against War Memorial Cross in Santa Clara (CA) Public Park

For some reason, in Santa Clara (California), there’s a 14-foot-tall Christian cross that’s been in a public park since the 1950s. The Freedom From Religion Foundation filed a lawsuit yesterday (along with resident Andrew DeFaria) claiming that it represents an illegal government endorsement of Christianity. And of course they’re right about that because what the hell else would it represent?

MemorialCrossClara

The lawsuit isn’t coming out of nowhere. FFRF contacted city officials more than a dozen times over the past few years alerting them to the problem. They never fixed it. Now they’ll have to face the consequences in court.

FFRF contends that the city’s decision to accept the cross and its subsequent display and maintenance “amounts to the advancement of religion,” specifically Christianity.

FFRF Senior Staff Attorney Rebecca Markert first complained in April 2012 to the city’s then-mayor, Jamie L. Matthews. The city indicated two months later that it looked forward “to resolving this matter in an expeditious and responsible manner.”

In the past three years, on at least 12 occasions, Markert and other FFRF employees have followed up on the status of the cross’s removal. But the city’s only action to date has been to remove a sign reading “Memorial Cross Park.”

We know how the city will defend this already: They’ll say it’s “tradition.” Or that it’s not a promotion of Christianity… somehow. We’ve seen this script play out before. Just because the cross has been there for decades isn’t good enough reason to keep it there forever. War memorials out to honor everyone who died for our country, not just Christians. If city officials can’t bring themselves to find an inclusive monument, then there shouldn’t be one on government property at all.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!