If you put your money on South Dakota as the first state to propose legislation to weaken science standards in school, you win!
State Senator Jeff Monroe and five of his colleagues are joined by five State Representatives — all Republican, of course — to sponsor SB 55. It would amend existing law to include the following line:
No teacher may be prohibited from helping students understand, analyze, critique, or review in an objective scientific manner the strengths and weaknesses of scientific information presented in courses being taught which are aligned with the content standards established pursuant to § 13-3-48.
“Strengths and weaknesses” is just code for information that weakens confidence in science — specifically evolution. To be sure, if that information were actually out there, teachers should absolutely bring it up. However, it’s not out there, and this legislation is intended to create a way for teachers to promote Intelligent Design (which has no credibility among working scientists) in the classroom without consequence.
No school board or school administrator may prohibit a teacher in public or nonpublic school from providing instruction on intelligent design or other related topics.
He was wrong about that. Nothing good would’ve come from the bill, and there were no misconceptions. Science advocates knew exactly what he was doing and they screamed it from the rooftops.
The new legislation avoids the “Intelligent Design” phrase and uses the “strengths and weaknesses” euphemism instead. But make no mistake: It’s not better legislation. It’s the same anti-science bill that doesn’t deserve to get out of committee.
Monroe wants the students of South Dakota to be as ignorant as he is.
Don’t let it happen. If you live in South Dakota, contact your representatives and urge them to vote against this legislation.