Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles Approves “ATHE1ST” License Plate After ACLU Threatens Litigation March 22, 2017

Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles Approves “ATHE1ST” License Plate After ACLU Threatens Litigation

When Chris Bontrager tried to request an “ATHE1ST” license plate from the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, the website said it was available, he paid the fee, and everything seemed fine.

17102076_10158279528375125_277147988_n

But he eventually got a letter from the BMV saying he needed to try again because his request didn’t get approval. While they didn’t give him a specific explanation, the letter explained that the only reasons a personalized plate could be rejected is if it was “offensive to good taste or decency,” misleading, or “improper.”

None of those reasons made any sense when considering a license plate that merely said the A-word.

That’s why the ACLU of Indiana got involved and said it would consider litigation against the BMV if they didn’t reconsider the plate.

Looks like that threat may have done the trick because Chris finally received his license plate without further hassle:

17475382_10158383143625125_806428340_o

17373358_10158383143835125_174757038_o

He told me this afternoon:

While it should never have been an issue in the first place, I am glad to see the BMV come around without having to go through an official appeal process. It is one small victory in the fight for freedom of religious expression, or in my case, the ability to express my lack of belief in a religion.

What most religious people are unaware of is that I was fighting for their rights as well as atheist rights. Unfortunately most believe that religious freedom only applies to their religion.

He’s right about that last point. Would anyone have pushed back against a license plate with a religious word on it? Just because a vanity plate idea is unpopular isn’t reason enough for the government to reject it. If BMV officials think twice now before sending a similar letter to anybody else, I’d call this a victory for everyone.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!