It was disturbing to learn last week that Pakistani officials had asked Twitter and Facebook to identify citizens who “shared material deemed offensive to Islam.” In a nation with incredibly strict blasphemy laws and where so-called blasphemers have been slaughtered, the companies would’ve effectively been issuing death warrants for people by complying with the request.
As far as we knew, though, neither company said yes.
But according to reports today from the Pakistani English-language newspaper Dawn, Facebook has blocked approximately 85% of blasphemous material reported on the social network:
Interior Secretary Arif Khan said in his report that Facebook had responded to their letter and showed its willingness to remove content deemed blasphemous.
Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) Chairman Ismael Shah said a team, comprising 25 members, has been working to search blasphemous content online. He said that the authority has so far taken action against 40 such pages.
He said the Facebook administration has realised the issue and “assured to comply with our demand”.
“Facebook agreeing to our demands is a big achievement,” the PTA chief said.
Plus, if Facebook really was complying with some request from the Pakistani government, why wouldn’t all the reported pages have come down?
Facebook still needs to make very clear, publicly, that it will never comply with such requests. Free speech regarding religious criticism matters far more than someone’s feelings getting hurt because Islam was the subject of it. Not every reported offense deserves to be taken seriously.