Child Sexual Abuse within the Dutch Catholic Church

Tell me if you’ve heard this one before…

An independent Commission of Inquiry was conducted recently, investigating historical child sexual abuse within the Dutch Roman Catholic Church.

They found tens of thousands of victims and (wait for it) about 800 possible perpetrators over the span of around 60 years. It’s incredible how much “sin” took place in a place that’s supposed to be holy.

Statistics indicate that, in general, child sexual abuse is vastly under-reported, so the numbers are likely far higher than what was found.

Why does this happen? Here are a few possible theories as to why the sexual abuse of children remains quite prominent within the Church:

  1. Child sex abusers are drawn to a profession where they will have ample opportunities to work with young children where they are in a position of power, authority, and trust.
  2. The repression of sexuality that is mandatory within the Catholic Church leads to “unhealthy” sexual behaviours.
  3. The perpetrators themselves also grew up within the Church and possibly had their own sexual abuse experiences and are thus perpetuating the abuse cycle.
  4. Religion urges followers (including innocent children) to trust people they might otherwise be wary of.

Wim Deetman, the former government minister who commissioned this investigation seems to agree with at least one of those theories (Yes, I know, I’m quoting FOX News. I apologize).

Deetman said the inquiry could not establish a “scientific link” between priests’ celibacy and abuse, but he added, “we don’t consider it impossible… maybe if there was voluntary celibacy a number of problems would not have happened.”

(If celibacy became voluntary, would any priests really opt for it?)

It will also come as no surprise that the church attempted to conceal the dismal facts.

“Bishops and other church authorities were not ignorant of the problem of sexual abuse. Moreover, in the view of the Commission of Inquiry, in many cases they failed to take adequate action and paid too little attention to victims,” the report says.

Not to mention that Church staff who had been accused of such crimes were often sent to other institutions to teach but never actually admonished. The protection of the Church was paramount to the protection of innocent children. This is, of course, not the first time cover ups have occurred — just ask the Pope.

The Dutch Church set up a fund for financial compensations to the victims, scaled based on the nature and severity of the abuse and are making some other attempts at reparation. While I suppose that something is better than nothing, it’s not nearly enough. Acknowledgement and change needs to happen on a much larger scale.

While I often wish that the confines of religion were abolished, I don’t feel overly optimistic about that possibility. In the meantime, parents need to educate their children about what sexual abuse is and how to keep themselves safe. Blind faith in a non-existent god is one thing, but parents need not have blind faith in religious “leaders.” Young children believe what they are told, especially by those they trust. Most children also have an innate sense of what is right or wrong. When you advise children to fully trust in people merely because they are “servants” to your god, and you assume they are therefore good people, you rob that child of the vital ability to use their intuition. Compound this with the guilt and shame that is plentiful within most religions (especially when it comes to that sinful sexual stuff) and you create a terrible situation where a child is not likely to disclose what’s happening to them and the abuse continues.

I work professionally with children who have experienced sexual abuse and I am by no means claiming that most sexual abuse happens within the confines of religion, because it doesn’t. However, religion has the tendency to override rationality and good judgment. Parents need to acknowledge that religion does not make you any more moral than others and that bad people will do bad things… so teach your children to recognize those people.

I would give this same advice to all parents, religious or not: Protect your children. Because there probably isn’t a god out there doing it for you.

Debunking Santa Is Just Practice for God

As Christmas approaches, many atheist parents might be wondering if they should tell their young children about the infamous obese man in a red velvet suit, who goes around the world (overnight) in a flying sleigh pulled by reindeer, slides down chimneys (or possibly picks the locks), and delivers presents (but only if you have been really well behaved).

Sounds plausible…

One of the major issues for parents is that they don’t want to encourage their children to believe in a fictitious male, with grandiose powers, who is always watching to see if you’ve been “naughty or nice,” and then decides whether you’ve made the cut… because let’s be honest, we’ve heard enough of those stories already.

There may be other reasons for not making Santa a part of your holiday, but I suspect that the desire for your children to be skeptics who think critically, aspire to facts, and don’t fall prey to delusional thinking, is a huge motivator! All that combined with the fact that some people find Santa a bit creepy and don’t want to support mass consumerism (but that’s another post).

It isn’t all bad news, though. Santa Claus is a great way to get your child to start using his/her critical thinking skills, a way to practice thinking their way to reality. As Dale McGowan points out in his book Parenting Beyond Belief:

By allowing our children to participate in the Santa myth and find their own way out of it through skeptical inquiry, we give them a priceless opportunity to see a mass cultural illusion first from the inside, then from the outside. A very casual line of post-Santa questioning can lead kids to recognize how completely we all can snow ourselves if the enticements are attractive enough. Such a lesson, viewed from the top of the hill after exiting a belief system under their own power, can gird kids against the best efforts of the evangelists — and far better than secondhand knowledge could ever hope to do.

I plan to do the Santa thing with my children. In general, make believe is crucial to children’s development of creativity, empathy, learning, and problem-solving. I like to think of Santa as a make-believe game that may go on for a number of years. There may be nothing magical about Santa himself, but there is something “magical” in a child’s eyes on Christmas Eve and the anticipatory delight is truly contagious. I want my children to experience that as well as many other secular family traditions that we hope to create for them. For us, the holidays are about family, friends, fun, food, giving, being appreciative of what you have… and just a little of the frivolities of the commercialized Christmas, including decorated trees, stockings, tinsel, and (of course) Santa.

I will let my daughter be skeptical and ask questions, and will allow her to come to her own conclusions and to eventually discover the “truth.” I won’t push the story, telling her continuous lies and fabricating information just to prolong her belief. That would be too analogous to the indoctrination of children that I so despise within religion. Should she for some strange reason continue to believe in Santa well past an age that we think is “healthy,” we will then tell her the truth.

For many atheists — especially atheist parents — this time of year can cause great angst because it isn’t always easy to escape the pressures of family, friends, and society without sacrificing your own beliefs and values.

Parents are free to make their own choices, but I would encourage you to allow your children just a little room for myths and fantasy. Because, combined with a little skepticism and a whole lot of critical thinking, they should turn out just fine.

The Result of the ‘War on Christmas’

Look at what all you evil Jews, atheists, and gays are doing to children because of your “War on Christmas!”

Have you no decency…?

Religious Groups React to Anti-Bullying Legislation Passed in Ontario

Premier Dalton McGuinty just announced that under new anti-bullying legistlation, students will be able to set up gay-straight alliance clubs (though the name may be different) in ALL public schools in Ontario.

“We’re going to require that, at every school where students request that this be put in place, they be permitted to organize themselves with a gay-straight alliance.”

It will come as no shock that various religious groups are unhappy about this.

Charles McVety, of the Institute for Canadian Values, stated, “To force, especially Christian classrooms or schools, to have homosexual clubs would of course be an affront to their family values.”

What about the affront to those students that have identified themselves as gay or bisexual or transgendered or… (possibly coming from religious homes themselves) and are struggling desperately to be accepted both within their familes and within their peer group? Don’t they have rights too?

McVety went on to add:

“And what does this have to do with bullying? Nothing.”

Ummm… because gay kids don’t get bullied, right? Or is it possible that he could be implying that when you make fun of, harass, beat, or torment a student who has identified as being gay, that’s different than “real” bullying of an innocent child?

This particular news article has a lot of other “inspiring” quotes from the religious in case the one above isn’t enough.

It is my understanding that this anti-bullying legislation encompasses more than just the requirement that students be permitted to form these groups if they so choose. It also allows schools to permanently expel students for bullying behaviours, rather than just being limited to suspensions. This is the most severe act a school can take and the message is clear…bullying is NOT acceptable. Period.

There also apparently is information in the legislation broadening the definition of gender and sexual identity, something that has the religious groups blowing smoke out of their ears. Having not read the legislation myself, I’m hesitant to comment about specifics, but I think it’s about time that sexuality and gender were acknowledged as more of a continuum rather than a black and white concept.

Bullying is a HUGE issue everywhere and many attempts are being made around the country to address this issue and now it’s coming from the top.

“We’re taking policies with respect to bullying and giving them the force of law by introducing those by means of a bill and ensuring that boards must take concrete steps when it comes to preventing, intervening and applying progressive consequences…”

Well good for you McGuinty! I’m sure students around the province of Ontario are thanking you today, regardless of their sexual orientation.