He is an out atheist, the president of LaGrange Humanists. Just a few days ago, he qualified as a Democratic candidate for the District 69 seat in the Georgia House of Representatives. He’s running on a campaign of marijuana legalization, campaign finance reform, and opposition to war (including the war on women, he specifies).

His opponent, Randy Nix, is the Republican incumbent, a Methodist pastor, and a former chaplain’s assistant. In his five years in office, Nix has voted to ban abortion after 20 weeks and require an ultrasound, to require English-only driver’s license exams, and to prohibit health care mandates. (You can see Nix’s full voting record here).  Needless to say, they’re polar opposites.

So does Mr. Smith have a snowball’s chance in hell of winning this thing?

Recently, I had a a chance to ask him. (Links have been added by me for the sake of clarity.)

Mike Smith, out atheist and Georgia congressional candidate.

Tell me about yourself, in your own words, and why you decided to run.

I have always been an atheist. I graduated from high school here, joined the army, went to Vietnam, came home, and worked my way through college and law school. Meanwhile, I married and we had a son who now has a son of his own. In 2000, my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer, and I took her to all of her treatments. While she sat in the chemo chair, I would read about Buddhism because I had planned to take a class on Buddhist Psychology. I came to consider myself a secular Buddhist. In 2002, my wife of over 31 years died, and Buddhism helped me understand that I have no control over anything, especially death. I rode a motorcycle from here to Alaska and back in 2003 and it gave me a lot of time to think. In 2004, I married my second wife, and we have two daughters, ages 3 and 5. In 2006, I also had surgery for cancer, but that seems to be in remission.

9-11-2001 was important because it showed me the deadly side of what I had always considered a backward and hateful institution: supernatural religion. I read all of the New Atheist books and agreed with most of what I read. In 2008, like many Obama supporters, I was asked by the Obama campaign and by MoveOn.org to write letters-to-the-editor of my local paper to discuss issues suggested by those groups. When my letters were printed, there were many letters in response calling me a left-wing/fascist/liberal/Communist/atheist, and I soon realized that I could write my own letters about the things I cared about, mostly atheism.

Meanwhile, I was elected to the local Democratic party as a voting member and recruited others in an effort to strengthen the party. One of our goals has been to have as many Democrats as possible on the ballot. We now have about four local candidates, and I had planned to be one of them, possibly a county commissioner candidate.

This past winter, the Georgia general assembly went crazy, passing all kinds of oppressive laws designed to punish women, the poor, and union members. The Republicans also legislated their right to force the Ten Commandments into all public buildings. At that point, I decided to run for the legislature rather than the county commission. I also joined protests against actions of the legislature and helped form the Occupy LaGrange group in support of the Occupy movement.

As coincidences happen, the general manager of the newspaper is the wife of a preacher that asked the City of LaGrange for a $10,000 gift for a Jesus/Winshape summer camp. I wrote a letter to the city, and couple of days later, the city decided to decline the donation to the church. At about the same time, the editor of the newspaper retired, and the new editor seems to be under the influence the preacher’s wife/general manager because they stopped printing my letters. As a result, the political campaign will give me a new venue to express my atheism.

You’re an out atheist. How did you come to identify as such, and how do you feel it shapes you and your decisions?

I answered most of this above, but atheism is clearly the most reasonable way to view the world. By another name, it is Humanism, the philosophy of living with compassion and reason, but without gods. I am reading The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt, who seems to argue that we are motivated by emotion more than by reason, but I can see that some emotions are fostered by reason. For example, I have strong emotions against being forced to do or believe things that do not make sense. That emotion is the sense of freedom.

What values of Georgians do you feel that you best represent?

Fairness and Freedom.

Georgia remains very conservative. How do you plan to convince traditionally conservative voters to support you?

Freedom may be the most conservative American ideal. To address atheism, I will have to emphasize freedom, freedom of religion, and the freedom of all Americans to not believe in supernatural things. Voters who understand that it is fair for atheists to be freed from religion should support me.

What do you see as the toughest battle of your campaign?

My toughest battle will be to convince those conservative voters to support me. It will be difficult to overcome their irrational prejudices.

First, I will have to win the Democratic primary on July 31^st. I plan to do that by participating in as many Democratic events as I can find in the District. There are three county parties here: Troup, Heard, and Carroll. I talked to my Democratic opponent and he does not seem very motivated to participate in discussions or debates, although I think that would be a very good way to get the pubic engaged in the process. Since I have a disinterested opponent, the challenge will be to overcome the prejudice that many have against atheists.

One solution might be to not emphasize my worldview until after the primary. However, the largest city in the district is LaGrange and many people here already know I am an atheist because of my frequent letters to the editor about atheism over the past few years. So, the primary may be my only opportunity to make the voters aware of atheism.

What do you think your chances of election are? [Emphasis mine.]

A political consultant told me from the beginning that he expects the Republican incumbent to raise about $70,000, and that a Democrat might be able to raise about $40,000 but would be lucky to receive about 30% of the vote in this district. He said the benefit of running for the House was that I would receive enough exposure to possibly win a county school board seat the next time.

Another obstacle is the fact that I have decided to not accept contributions because I think money corrupts politics. We should make all political contributions illegal and publically finance all election campaigns. I have enough money to do basic campaigning, but I will not be wasting my funds. So, the financial odds are also be against me.

However, I think that elections should be about ideas, not about money. So, it may be more realistic to believe that my chances at winning depend on the level of voter excitement about the issues I have raised, including: ending legalized bribery of legislators by lobbyists, making the rich [pay] a fairer share of taxes so that we don’t have to keep closing our schools, and legalizing and taxing marijuana. If I am the candidate in November and there is interest in these issues, I think I have a reasonable chance.

(In response to this post.)

(via noelplum99)

Watching Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob provide commentary

(Possibly NSFW language… but it’s hilarious)

(Thanks to Patrick for the link!)

If we long for our planet to be important, there is something we can do about it. We make our world significant by the courage of questions and by the depth of our answers. — Carl Sagan

(via The Thinking Atheist)

Imagine a team of well-versed atheists taking first place! And all winnings go to charities. We just missed the Atlanta casting call but those of you in the Los Angeles, Chicago, and Dallas areas still have a chance!

Tentative Schedule
Los Angeles: May 14th-June 8th
Chicago: June 1st-3rd
Dallas: June 1st-3rd
(June 2nd “Vista Ridge Mall” beginning at 10am) First 500 people receive a free gift!

WHO:
We want teams made up of three people — Grab your friends, your bible study partners, your family members or your coworkers! Teams of three people who have competitive spirits, great personal testimonies, a general knowledge of pop culture – and, of course, you have to know your Bible! Do you love the Bible, want to share your knowledge, and compete to win money for the charity of their choice?! SIGN UP!

WHAT:
OPEN CASTING CALL: GSN (Game Show Network) and the creators of “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition” are looking for you! We are casting ”American Bible Challenge” with Jeff Foxworthy! We’re looking for teams of three! IF YOU HAVE A PASSION FOR THE BIBLE AND LOVE COMPETITION, THIS IS THE PERFECT GAME SHOW FOR YOU!

Come on, you know you wanna….

(Thanks to Bob for the link!)

The scene features lawyer Henry Drummond (played by Spencer Tracy) questioning Bible expert Matthew Harrison Brady (played by Fredric March). Here’s the transcript:

Brady: “Is it possible that something is holy to the celebrated agnostic!?”

Drummond: “Yes! the individual human mind!… In a child’s power to master the multiplication table there is more sanctity than in all your shouted amens and holy-holies and hossana’s, an idea is a greater monument than a cathedral and the advance of man’s knowledge is a greater miracle than all the sticks turnt to snakes for the parting of the waters. But now, are we to forgo all this progress because Mr. Brady now frightens us with a fable?

Gentlemen, progress has never been a bargain, you have to pay for it, sometimes I thinks there’s a man who sits behind a counter and says… Alright you can have the telephone, but you lose privacy and the charm of distance. Madam you may vote, but at a price, you lose the right to retreat behind the powderpuff or your petticoat. Mister! you may conquer the air, but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will smell of gasoline.

Darwin took us forward to a hilltop from where we could look back and see the way from which we came, but for this insight and for this knowledge we must abandon our faith in the pleasant poetry of Genesis”

Brady: “We must not abandon Faith! Faith is a most important thing!”

Drummond: “Then why did God plague us with the power to think Mr.Brady, why do you deny the one faculty of man that raises him above the other creatures of the Earth, the power of his brain to reason? what other merit have we? the Elephant is larger, the Horse is swifter and stronger, the Butterfly is far more beautiful, the Mosquito is more prolific, even the simple Sponge is more durable! what does a Sponge think?”

Brady: “I dont know, I’m a Man not a Sponge!”

(Court laughs)

Drummond: “What do you think a Sponge thinks?”

Brady: “If the Lord wishes a Sponge to think, it thinks.”

Drummond: “Do you think a Man should have the same privileges of a Sponge?”

Brady: “Of course!”

Drummond: “This man wishes to accorded the same privileges of a Sponge! He wishes to think!”

(Thanks to Brian for the link!)

Regardless of how serious you think this issue is, these policies are necessary. Not as a punishment or a threat, but as a promise to attendees that the places we gather in are safe spaces for any and all who would like to attend.

There have been many ideas as to what kinds of efforts should take place in order to ensure that each conference does its best to squelch harassment, such as a sticker system akin to that used by MENSA and posters declaring spaces safe.

Is this enough? What kinds of measures would you like conference organizers to take in order to ensure your safety?

As always, if there are any bits we should pay special attention to, just leave the timestamp and a summary in the comments.

(via Token Skeptic)

How many of you have done that?

(via PostSecret)