The case against the Olympics

The Winter Olympics begin February 7 in Sochi, Russia, and people are getting nervous over terrorism threats, anti-gay laws, the toilet situation, and whatever Vladimir Putin might do.

Columnist Charles Lane argues that the Olympics have gotten too politicized, too expensive, too drug-saturated, too corrupt, and too corporate.  We should just end them.  Read his case against the Olympics here.

Does he have a point?  Or is there still value in having virtually all of the countries of the world come together in a huge athletic event?  Might the Olympics be reformed rather than killed?

""Reasoned consideration" is not happening. University of Texas in removing their statues [all related to ..."

Today’s Iconoclastic Outbreak
"I suspect this sudden desire to destroy the physical memory embodied by monuments was enabled ..."

Today’s Iconoclastic Outbreak
"Yeah, lots of people in the suburbs of my city are scared of the "bad ..."

What cities have the best quality ..."
"If the criteria for smashing a monument is because it positively depicts a slave owner...That ..."

Today’s Iconoclastic Outbreak
Follow Us!
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment