The case against the Olympics

The Winter Olympics begin February 7 in Sochi, Russia, and people are getting nervous over terrorism threats, anti-gay laws, the toilet situation, and whatever Vladimir Putin might do.

Columnist Charles Lane argues that the Olympics have gotten too politicized, too expensive, too drug-saturated, too corrupt, and too corporate.  We should just end them.  Read his case against the Olympics here.

Does he have a point?  Or is there still value in having virtually all of the countries of the world come together in a huge athletic event?  Might the Olympics be reformed rather than killed?

"You need to read the linked article more carefully. Dreher, Esolen, Chaput, and Deneen aren't ..."

Will the New Critics of Liberal ..."
"Then you really don't have a leg to stand on. You "look past" the same ..."

Evangelicals’ Realpolitik
"Well there's Burkean classical conservatism, which may not fit perfectly into any of those boxes. ..."

Will the New Critics of Liberal ..."
"No. Hillary Clinton has been investigated backwards and forwards for thirty years, and doesn't seems ..."

Evangelicals’ Realpolitik

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment