Just let Google run the country?

Justine Tunney, one of the founders of Occupy Wall Street, is calling on President Obama to resign, have all government workers retire, and transfer all administrative authority to the tech industry, making Google chairman Eric Schmidt the “C.E.O. of America.”

But aren’t leftists always complaining about the influence of big corporations on the government?  Ms. Tunney claims that the tech industry is actually “post-capitalist.”

OK, she only has two signatures on her petition at the time of the news report, so this isn’t a realistic threat to our constitutional republic.  But still, even people on the right say that government should be run “like a business.”  What are the problems with this?


From Alex Hern, Occupy founder calls on Obama to appoint Eric Schmidt ‘CEO of America’ | Technology | theguardian.com:

One of the co-founders of the Occupy Wall Street movement has called on Barack Obama to resign as president, and “appoint Eric Schmidt CEO of America”.

Justine Tunney, a self-styled “champagne tranarchist”, is now a software engineer at Google, but remains involved with Occupy Wall Street, through the occupywallst.org website, which she created.

In the petition, which currently has two signatures (a far cry from the 195,000 who follow the Occupy Wall Street twitter account Tunney started in 2011), she calls on Obama to arrange a national referendum to:

1.  Retire all government employees with full pensions.

2.  Transfer administrative authority to the tech industry.

3.  Appoint Eric Schmidt CEO of America. . . .

“It never ceases to amaze me how far people have to stretch in order to denounce the one corporation that gives away everything for free,” she wrote. Explaining on Twitter why she thinks anti-capitalism is compatible with promotion of her employers, she argued that “Tech companies expropriate ad money from capitalists to build a superintelligence & don’t pay dividends!”

“Silicon Valley is firmly post-capitalist. There just isn’t a name for it yet, nor an intellectual [assessment],” she continued.


"The lesson here is don't get behind people who have too much baggage like Trump ..."

Has Trump Come Through for Pro-Lifers ..."
"No, that isn't what I just said.Firstly: If for you to be "pro-life" means nothing ..."

Has Trump Come Through for Pro-Lifers ..."
"I would have expected her to be a liberal interventionist, like her husband was before ..."

Has Trump Come Through for Pro-Lifers ..."
"Before this week, I have never heard anyone argue that one can stop Kim Jong ..."

Has Trump Come Through for Pro-Lifers ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment