Prince George, the future King of England, was baptized yesterday. For that occasion, the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, who baptized the prince, made a quite remarkable video about the meaning of baptism. Read the excerpts and watch the video after the jump. Note the very end, especially, about the Sacrament signifying that Christ is “for you.” It sounds pretty Lutheran to me! [Read more…]
In our continuing effort to try to figure out the new Pope of Rome–is he a liberal? a traditionalist? a traditionalist acting liberal?–another possibility has presented itself: Is he evangelical? (Not “an evangelical,” but evangelical in the sense of stressing the Gospel–grace, Christ, the Word of God–more than the typical Roman Catholic pontiff?) [Read more…]
An objection being made to Tullian Tchividjian’s op-ed piece in the Washington Post that we blogged about yesterday (and that came up in our discussion too) is that legalism just isn’t the problem in the church today. Rather, churches are rife with licentiousness. Too much preaching of grace and forgiveness can encourage people to keep sinning. We need more preaching of the Law to encourage people to act morally.
Actually, though, both legalism and licentiousness are different forms of self-righteousness. The legalist thinks to earn God’s favor by his rectitude. The libertine does whatever he wants with no guilt to hold him back. Both are antinomian, denying their condemnation under the Law. Both reject the Gospel because they think they don’t need it. Neither has faith. (Since good works are the fruits of faith, if you don’t have good works, you need more faith, which means you need more Gospel.)
That’s the way I see it. After the jump, read Rev. Tchividjian’s response. [Read more…]
Tullian Tchividjian, Billy Graham’s grandson and the pastor of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, has published an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, no less. The problem with America’s churches today, he argues, is that so many of them have been downplaying the main message of Christianity.
We can give people the impression that Christianity is first and foremost about the sacrifices we make rather than the sacrifice Jesus made for us – our performance rather than his performance for us. The hub of Christianity is not “do something for Jesus.” The hub of Christianity is “Jesus has done everything for you.” And my fear is that too many people, both inside and outside the church, have heard our “do more, try harder” sermons and pleas for intensified devotion and concluded that the focus of the Christian faith is the work that we do instead of the work God has done for us in the person of Jesus.
After the jump, read the whole column. [Read more…]
Pope Francis has said that he is against “proselytizing.” But he is also speaking on what his predecessor started, the “new evangelization.” After the jump, some of his remarks on the subject. He is advocating “dialogue with those who do not share our beliefs,” which he has been doing, and projecting “God’s mercy and tenderness.” He’s been doing that too. He is talking about “witnessing,” which we often think of as a Protestant term, depending on what is meant by that.
I’m curious if there is a difference between “evangelization” and “evangelism.” And how a Roman Catholic, in particular, for whom church membership is critical, carries out “evangelizing” without “proselytizing.” Can Christians who are not Roman Catholics join in these efforts as he describes them? Also, is the “evangel”–the good news of Christ’s forgiveness won on the Cross–always clear, either in Catholic “evangelization” or Protestant “evangelism”? [Read more…]
The Gospel reading for last Sunday was the parable that makes perfectly clear why we are not saved by our works and why we cannot merit salvation:
7 “Will any one of you who has a servant plowing or keeping sheep say to him when he has come in from the field, ‘Come at once and recline at table’? 8 Will he not rather say to him, ‘Prepare supper for me, and dress properly,and serve me while I eat and drink, and afterward you will eat and drink’? 9 Does he thank the servant because he did what was commanded? 10 So you also, when you have done all that you were commanded, say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done what was our duty.’” (Luke 17:7-10)
Even if we obeyed God perfectly and never did anything wrong, we wouldn’t deserve a reward. That would simply be doing the bare minimum of what we are supposed to do. We would only be doing our duty. After the jump, see what our pastor, Rev. James Douthwaite did with this text, bringing out both Law and Gospel. [Read more…]