The Obama administration and the state of California argued that law enforcement officials should be able to go through the information on a person’s cell phone, which they argued was no different from asking someone to turn out his pockets. But the Supreme Court, striking a blow for privacy in 21st century technology, ruled–unanimously, no less–that cell phone data (which includes not just call records but with your calendar and appointments a record of nearly all of your activities) is private and cannot be accessed by authorities without a warrant. [Read more…]
Alexandra Petri discusses the decline in people checking their voicemails, the demise of landlines, and how texting is replacing live conversations. Read the whole essay. A sample:
A phone is not for making calls.
Phones are actually devices that you use to avoid talking to people, and anyone who thinks otherwise is surely older than 30. [Read more…]
The media reported that a supercomputer passed the Turing Test, a measure of artificial intelligence in which a computer can pass as a human being. But it turns out that this is just one of the many examples tracked on this blog (as some of you commenters have pointed out) of incompetent reporting on science and technology. Here is a link to the big story. Then, after the jump, a link to a tech site debunking the claim, along with some specific points that the article got wrong. [Read more…]
The Secret Service is in the market for software that can detect sarcasm. That way the government agencies that monitor what you say on the internet will be able to tell whether you are joking if you threaten the president or if you really mean it.
Two points of interest here: The government is really serious about monitoring Facebook, Twitter, and other internet media, doing continual automated monitoring of anything that might be construed as threatening statements. Note how this could be both used and abused.
There is also the technical problem of a software program being able to detect language that does not mean exactly what it says. How can a mechanized process determine the possible meanings and intentions of a statement such as “I’m going to kill him!” Attention to context, of course, would help. (Note to government monitors of this blog: The statement before the previous sentence is for illustrative purposes only.) But there is not always clear context. “Artificial intelligence” can only take us so far in emulating the human mind, since intelligence is only one of many faculties of the mind, which also include imagination, the will, emotion, as well as complicated uses such as play, humor, fiction, and self-expression. [Read more…]
The mystery surrounding the Malaysian airliner that seemingly disappeared into thin air seemed to have been solved when searchers announced that they had detected pings from the airplane’s black box in the Indian Ocean. But now, after a large-scale search of the area, searchers are saying that the pings weren’t from the aircraft after all. The mystery of the disappearing airliner remains. [Read more…]