Under China’s one-child policy, girl babies were routinely aborted so that the parents’ one child would be a son. As a result, there are far more men than women in China. This “woman shortage” means that many men can’t find anyone to marry. So human traffickers are kidnapping women, particularly in Viet Nam, and selling them as brides in China. This is becoming a big business, as CNN reports, after the jump.
The Chinese Communist party announced that it is lifting its one-child policy, which led to the forced abortion of millions of children.
Not that the party is becoming pro-life: The policy led to a demographic mess, with an imbalance of more men than women (girls being most frequently aborted) and a shortage of new workers that threatens the nation’s economic growth. Nor is the party embracing any kind of freedom, in which couples can choose how many children they have. Now married couples will be allowed to have two children, but no more.
After the jump, excerpts and a link to a rather remarkable article in the usually pro-abortion Washington Post about the “horrors” of the one-child policy. [Read more…]
Still-Communist China announced a series of social, economic, and political reforms. Most notable is the change in China’s one-child policy, which has been enforced by forced abortion. Not that China has given its people freedom. Now if the husband and the wife can both claim the status of “only child,” they can have two babies without penalty. So now there is more of a two-child policy. [Read more…]
Chen Guangcheng is a Chinese lawyer who has been battling China’s forced abortion policy. For his efforts, he has been in and out of prison since 2005. After his last release in 2010, Mr. Chen has been under house arrest even though he has not been charged with a crime. That means that his home is surrounded by armed plain-clothed guards who prevent him and his wife from leaving and from receiving any visitors.
Last week Mr. Chen somehow escaped and made his way 300 miles to Beijing. Oh, yes. Mr. Chen is totally blind.
He has reportedly taken refuge in the U. S. Embassy. American diplomats are saying that this comes at the worse possible time because Secretary of State Clinton and Treasury Secretary Geithner are coming to Beijing this week for high-level talks and they fear the incident may harm relations between the two countries.
So why are we worried about how this makes China feel? Shouldn’t China be embarrassed, at the very least, about its brutal treatment of Mr. Chen and, much more importantly, the untold numbers of women whom it forces to get abortions after they have the allotted one child?
Since the 1970s, 163 million girl babies have been killed by abortion because their parents have wanted sons. Jonathan Last reviews a book on the subject:
Mara Hvistendahl is worried about girls. Not in any political, moral or cultural sense but as an existential matter. She is right to be. In China, India and numerous other countries (both developing and developed), there are many more men than women, the result of systematic campaigns against baby girls. In “Unnatural Selection,” Ms. Hvistendahl reports on this gender imbalance: what it is, how it came to be and what it means for the future.
In nature, 105 boys are born for every 100 girls. This ratio is biologically ironclad. Between 104 and 106 is the normal range, and that’s as far as the natural window goes. Any other number is the result of unnatural events.
Yet today in India there are 112 boys born for every 100 girls. In China, the number is 121—though plenty of Chinese towns are over the 150 mark. China’s and India’s populations are mammoth enough that their outlying sex ratios have skewed the global average to a biologically impossible 107. But the imbalance is not only in Asia. Azerbaijan stands at 115, Georgia at 118 and Armenia at 120.
What is causing the skewed ratio: abortion. If the male number in the sex ratio is above 106, it means that couples are having abortions when they find out the mother is carrying a girl. By Ms. Hvistendahl’s counting, there have been so many sex-selective abortions in the past three decades that 163 million girls, who by biological averages should have been born, are missing from the world. Moral horror aside, this is likely to be of very large consequence.
In the mid-1970s, amniocentesis, which reveals the sex of a baby in utero, became available in developing countries. Originally meant to test for fetal abnormalities, by the 1980s it was known as the “sex test” in India and other places where parents put a premium on sons. When amnio was replaced by the cheaper and less invasive ultrasound, it meant that most couples who wanted a baby boy could know ahead of time if they were going to have one and, if they were not, do something about it. “Better 500 rupees now than 5,000 later,” reads one ad put out by an Indian clinic, a reference to the price of a sex test versus the cost of a dowry.
But oddly enough, Ms. Hvistendahl notes, it is usually a country’s rich, not its poor, who lead the way in choosing against girls. “Sex selection typically starts with the urban, well-educated stratum of society,” she writes. “Elites are the first to gain access to a new technology, whether MRI scanners, smart phones—or ultrasound machines.” The behavior of elites then filters down until it becomes part of the broader culture. Even more unexpectedly, the decision to abort baby girls is usually made by women—either by the mother or, sometimes, the mother-in-law.
The reviewer goes on to talk about what the female shortage in China and India means. Ironically, the author of the book is not willing to oppose abortion, despite her data. Why aren’t feminists rising up against this mass murder of women?