Getting rid of Trump via the 25th amendment

Constitution-Print-C10314518The latest fantasy on the left of how they can get rid of Donald Trump involves invoking the 25th amendment.

I’m glad for the new interest in the Constitution, but the procedure for dropping a president who is “unfit for office” would require the complicity of the Vice President, the Cabinet, and both houses of Congress.

That is, the 25th Amendment would need Republicans–yea, conservatives– to carry it out.  This would also be an argument for Trump to pack his cabinet with loyalists rather than mainstream Republicans. [Read more…]

Judge sees “absolutely no value” in studying the Constitution

Richard Posner is a judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and a professor at the University of Chicago Law School.  In an op-ed for Slate, he said that he sees “absolutely no value” in judges devoting even seconds to studying the Constitution.  Even the Bill of Rights does “not speak to us today.”

Here is a link to what he said.  Cal Thomas dissects it after the jump.  Then I jump in on the topic, how could the United States cease to exist? [Read more…]

Civil rights must be “preeminent” over religious liberty

The U. S. Commission on Civil Rights is recommending that civil rights be made “preeminent” in American jurisprudence.  Specifically, that civil rights claims–for example, those regarding sexual orientation and gender-identity–should always trump religious freedom claims.  There would thus be no religious exemptions, because newly-coined rights would have priority over constitutional rights. [Read more…]

The government funneling money to its friends

Banks being punished for their part in the mortgage bubble disaster must pay restitution to the tune of, in some cases, billions of dollars.  But the obligation may be satisfied, in part, by contributing to Democratic-leaning advocacy organizations.

That money could go into the U. S. Treasury, but instead it goes to favored private agencies.   Congress is considering a bill that would stop this practice.  After the jump, George Will explains the important constitutional issues at stake. [Read more…]

Our unchecked, unbalanced Presidency

Donald Trump couldn’t really do all of the off-the-wall things he is calling for, some of his defenders are saying.  He’d have to have Congressional action.  Congress and the courts would keep him in line.  Well, the modern presidency has expanded its powers so much, says Marc Fisher, that he actually could do most of them.

In fact, thanks to recent presidents–including Barack Obama–our Constitutional system of each branch of the government checking and balancing each other, is seriously out of whack.  Fisher concludes with a chilling sentence:  “’Today’s system of checks and balances,’” [law professor Neal Devins] said , ‘is an abject failure.’”

This is part of what conservatives mean when they call for a “limited government.”  Our government today is unlimited.  And the powers of the presidency are becoming unlimited.

[Read more…]

A call to repeal the Second Amendment

In a piece for Rolling Stone, Drexel constitutional law professor David S. Cohen calls for repealing the Second Amendment.  He argues that the right to keep and bear arms “is outdated, a threat to liberty and a suicide pact.” [Read more…]