Democrats lost because they raised religious liberty fears

2519766036_d988be0058_zThe reason the Democrats lost, argues David Bernstein in the Washington Post, is that their words, actions, and policies made large numbers of Christians afraid that their religious liberty is in jeopardy.  So even though they had major qualms about Donald Trump, they voted for him in large enough numbers to give him the victory.

Bernstein’s point, I believe, is that Democrats wouldn’t have to threaten religious liberty to meet their major policy goals.  The country could have gay marriage without punishing those who don’t believe in it.  The country could have legalized and insurance-subsidized abortion without making religious people pay for it.  LGBT folks could have legal rights and find acceptance–probably more acceptance– even if they made some accommodation to religious sensitivities.  And yet, Democrats threatened and demonized Christians, oblivious to the fact that this meant that a very  large percentage of the American public would not be voting for them.

Read Bernstein’s analysis after the jump.  Is he describing you? [Read more…]

The Left’s support of Donald Trump

The Wikileaks e-mails of Democrats’ correspondence show that the Hillary Clinton campaign feared running against the more mainstream Republican candidates such as Marco Rubio.  So they launched an effort to legitimize the candidacy of Donald Trump, the assumption being that he would be perhaps the only candidate whom she could beat.  The strategists put out the word and progressive journalists did their bidding.  (The same journalists who wrote pro-Trump pieces during the primaries are frantically backtracking today.)

Alexandra Desanctis gives the details, linked and excerpted after the jump. [Read more…]

Whither Republicans? Whither Democrats?

Last Summer, liberal pundits were looking forward to “the end of the Republican party.”  That Republicans were doomed, due to the inexplicable nomination of Donald Trump and his inevitable defeat, was the expectation even of many Republicans up until election day.

But the day after the election, everything had reversed.  The Republicans have the presidency, the House, the Senate, and a Supreme Court pick.  Also 33 governors (picking up three yesterday) and 67 state legislatures.

Now it’s the Democrats that are “in crisis.”

Now I do think both parties have some soul-searching to do.  Some thoughts after the jump. [Read more…]

CNN caught feeding debate questions to Clinton

Donna Brazile is a Democratic operative who landed a gig as a commentator at CNN.  The Wikileak trove of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s e-mails includes Brazile giving him a question that would be asked in the CNN-hosted Town Hall debate.

Earlier Wikileaks seemed to indicate that she was leaking questions in earlier debates, but Brazile and CNN both strongly denied it.  But there is no question about what this e-mail says.

So CNN and Brazile have severed ties. [Read more…]

How to defeat conservatives

James O’Keefe, the undercover videographer who enrages leftists by recording what they say, has recorded Democratic operatives admitting to voting fraud, illegally colluding with the Clinton campaign,  and hiring agitators to start fights at Donald Trump rallies so as to associate the Republicans with violence.  (For all the tapes, go here.)

One of the operatives he interviews is Robert Creamer.  (For that video, go here.)

I’d like to turn your attention to something that  Creamer wrote back in 2007 in a book on how progressives can defeat conservatives.  His words are scarily prophetic.  They apply to more than just political conservatives, and they need to be remembered in the days ahead.  After the jump, read what he has to say. [Read more…]

What we learn from John Podesta’s emails

The emails regarding Hillary Clinton being released by Wikileaks are not from her illegal secret server that she used as Secretary of State.  Rather, they are hacks of the emails of John Podesta, her campaign chairman and longtime henchman.

In them, Podesta and scores of campaign operatives and other correspondents discuss things like the inner workings of the Clinton Foundation, how to co-opt Bernie Sanders and his supporters, collusion with journalists, and other topics embarrassing to Mrs. Clinton and other Democrats.

After the jump is an account of a remarkable exchange in which Podesta writes about subverting Catholicism so as to make it accord with the Progressive cause. [Read more…]