We’ve blogged about the findings that the internet has diminished people’s ability to read long, complex texts. Now the leading practitioner of print journalism is giving in to the trend. The Associated Press wire service has ordered its reporters to keep their stories no longer than 500 words. [Read more...]
In answer to my question about how reading conditioned by the internet might affect the way people read the Bible, Rev. Lucas Woodford (my former pastor) pointed to this article by Robin Phillips published in Touchstone in 2012, which also gets into the various ways reading itself has already changed over the centuries. An excerpt after the jump. [Read more...]
There is some evidence that the way we read on the internet–skimming, surfing, hopping from link to link–is interfering with the ability to read complex, content-rich books that require reading slowly and thoughtfully.
Do you think? Having just finished the 1500 page unabridged Les Miserables for free on my Kindle (an overwhelming experience that I’ll blog about later), I say not necessarily. But still, I can see the danger. I wonder what the eye-bite approach would do to Bible reading.
The kind of research that we literature professors appreciate:
Being pulled into the world of a gripping novel can trigger actual, measurable changes in the brain that linger for at least five days after reading, scientists have said. [Read more...]
Summertime, and the living is easy. A perfect time for reading. It’s about time for me to reload my Kindle. I have Lars Walker’s new novel, Hailstone Mountain, which I’m looking forward to reading, but that won’t get me through the summer. What books would you recommend? (Feel free to recommend whatever you want–some one reading this blog is likely to appreciate it–but I myself will be looking not so much for scholarly tomes, of which I get enough during the school year, but lighter fare that is just fun to read. The only limitation, Lit professor that I am, is that it needs to be well-written.)