Will the LGBT movement self-destruct?

Rachel Lu, writing in The Federalist, predicts that  The LGBT Movement Will Self-Destruct.  Signs that this might be the case:  It keeps pushing the boundaries to the point of making itself ridiculous; it has to silence and persecute its critics; it hasn’t shown that it can create a positive culture that can stand the test of time.

Read her article, linked after the jump.  Then read the rebuttal, also in The Federalist, by Jennifer Roback Morse, The LGBT Movement Will Not Self-Destruct.  She sees the transgender movement as a culmination of the Sexual Revolution with a totalitarian ideology.  (Samples from both articles after the jump.)

What do you think?

[Read more…]

How mothers battle totalitarianism

“Motherhood is the first and last line of defense against totalitarianism.”  So says Stella Morabito in The Federalist, where she takes up the question of why tyrants always try to undermine the family and explains how mothers are a bulwark for liberty. [Read more…]

Happiness vs. Freedom?

In a description of his new book, The Intolerable God, author Christopher J. Insole tells about a central struggle in the philosopher Immanuel Kant:  the conflict between happiness and freedom.

Now this sounds strange to American ears.  Surely, freedom is essential to happiness.  But Kant relates the issue to God.  Here is how Insole describes Kant’s dilemma:

We need God if we are to hope for happiness, as Kant thinks we must. We also need freedom, in a strong sense, in order to be moral. God must withdraw for this freedom to be possible. But if God withdraws, happiness can no longer be attained.

Read about this after the jump.  How would you resolve this dilemma?  I offer some thoughts myself. [Read more…]

A totalitarianism masquerading as beneficence

Novelist and former Time editor Michael Walsh has published a new book entitled The Devil’s Pleasure Palace: The Cult of Critical Theory and the Subversion of the West.  It’s about how critical theory–the notion that all cultural and linguistic expressions are to be “deconstructed” as mere impositions of power–has brought Western thought to the point of nihilism.  Kathryn Lopez interviews Walsh at National Review Online.  Read the whole thing, but I excerpt after the jump an exchange about how the radical left has become “Satanic” and how the canons of “political correctness” are being used, in the Marxist way, to suppress thought.  I especially like Walsh’s line about how the left has become “a totalitarianism masquerading as beneficence.”
[Read more…]

The Christian vs. the collective

Anthony Sacramone has a quite brilliant post entitled “There Are Only Two Conceptions of Human Ethics.”  He begins with an excerpt from Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon, a conversation between two Soviet-era totalitarians on the difference between the Christian ethic and the “collective” ethic.  Then he applies it. [Read more…]

Totalitarianism reconsidered

Some intellectuals are arguing that democracy cannot effectively address climate change–and, indeed, makes it worse–and that what we need to save the planet  is to eliminate political freedom and to turn towards a totalitarian government.  Others don’t go quite that far, but they hold up as the role model for effective government the People’s Republic of China.  (Never mind that China has the worst pollution on the planet!)

After the jump, an excerpt that demonstrates this from a study of the “Sustainability” ideology by the conservative academic organization the National Association of Scholars.

[Read more…]


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X