Developing: Hendrix not on Benedict's iPod

RatzingerinBlack.jpgI know this may sound too crazy to be true, ladies and gentlemen, but some university professors had their doubts about the cultural revolution of the 1960s. Try to wrap your head around this: Some adult Roman Catholics who had earned degrees and were paid to teach young people held on to the quaint notions that moral and theological truth flow from a transcendent source; that sex outside of marriage is a moral wrong and will harm people spiritually and, often, physically; that shouting down your professor is boorish and anti-democratic; and that, while the church favors democracy in secular governments, the church’s dogmas are not subject to a popular vote.

One such adult who believed these things was a theology professor named Joseph Ratzinger. Later he became a bishop. Then he became a cardinal. Then he oversaw the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, where colleagues came to know “a patient listener with an orderly mind” who “keeps a clean desk.”

The New York Times tells this backstory about Pope Benedict XVI, which of course is almost too fantastic for the wildest satirical film directed by Robert Altman. And here’s another amazing thing: The Times tells this breathtaking tale thoroughly, in a way that may even depict the new pope sympathetically — at least to people open to the idea that the student protests of 1968 in the “quaint, gingerbready town” of Tübingen, Germany, got many things wrong.

Print Friendly

  • http://www.tmatt.net tmatt

    This is a long, long article and contains a wide range of voices. I urge GetReligion readers to dig into it — especially if you have been miffed at the whole “Nazi pope” riff on the fringes of the MSM.

    It is amazing to contemplate the life of a man who spent his early childhood surrounded by Nazism (his father was a strong opponent of the Nazis), then lived to see his nation hit with another form of social revolt decades later.

    Here is a sample of this must-file article:

    His disgust at Nazism and his horror at the student upheaval – shaped by his readings of Saints Augustine and Bonaventure, and of Plato – formed the basis of the thinking he took to the Vatican in 1981: the idea that freedom flows from moral and doctrinal certainty. But so important to him was protecting the church as a fortress of moral authority that he said theologians must adhere to church teaching even if it is not infallible. In his “Instruction on the Ecclesial Vocation of the Theologian” of 1990, he ruled that dissenters must not try to sway public opinion because open criticism hurts the church.

    But he was also concerned for the society outside the church. For instance, during a speech to an anti-abortion convention in 1986, he said legalized abortion implied that “It is force that establishes right and thus, inadvertently for the many, the very bases of any authentic democracy are threatened.”

  • http://www.blidiot.blogspot.com/ William Sulik

    Even the Times article leaves out a few things — alluded to by Doug in his title. For example, few people know that Ratz showed Jimi a few licks during their time in the UK back in September 1966. (Some say the “Joe” in “Hey Joe”, released just a short time later was a passing reference to Joseph Ratzinger.) And the whole guitar on fire thing — that was Ratz’s suggestion.

    …just kidding…

  • http://massengale.typepad.com john massengale

    A friend has recommended this blog a few times. What strikes me is how much some of the posters seem to love setting up enemies to ridicule.

    I share your Christianity. I don’t share your conservatism, and I read the New York Times every day. All the venting is a turn off.

    The post a few days ago about Maureen Dowd is a case in point. Millions of people disagree with Maureen Dowd every day, only some of them from the viewpoint of the person who sets up the world as the Devout. These are straw men that comfort those most like you but turn away potential allies.

  • http://www.tmatt.net tmatt

    If anyone wants to see a different take on this basic topic, look at the Los Angeles Times story on the same subject.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-benedict24apr24.story

    It has one of my favorite loaded headlines of the papal transition period: “Pope Journeyed From Reformer to Enforcer.”

    So a “reformer” is someone who wants to change Catholic teachings? One cannot “reform” in the other direction?

  • http://dprice.blogspot.com Dale Price

    From Reformer to Enforcer–gaaaaaaaahhh!

    There’s a fascinating story waiting to be told about Vatican II, and especially from a “popular” journalistic perspective.

    It would tell the story of how the Council was the culmination of the reform efforts of the better part of a century, from a variety of different perspectives and approaches, from the sober and limited to the flatly revolutionary. It will tell the story of how the reform movement*s* managed to ally for the space of three years, but then had a falling out as the Church fell into chaos post-Council. It will come to the realization that Karol Wotyla, Joseph Ratzinger, Henri de Lubac, Jacques Maritain, Hans Urs von Balthasar and a veritable host of similarly-minded and later-misnamed-”conservatives” actually stood and continued to stand in an established, clear path of genuine Catholic reform.

    All it will take is a journalist willing to break out of the lazy political model of religion reportage, study the Council carefully, and consult a range of sources, from the traditionalist to the revolutionary.

    I have this sinking sensation I will be waiting for years and years and years to see something like this. If ever.

  • http://wildfaith.blogspot.com/ Darrell Grizzle

    I worked my way through the entire article on Sunday, not an easy task with a cat who kept jumping up into my lap and crumpling up the New York Times as I was reading. The article did help me to view the new Pope a little more sympathetically, and it did help me understand the thinking behind some of his theology.

    If the new Pope does indeed have an iPod, what tunes do you think are on it?

  • http://www.tmatt.net tmatt

    Darrell:

    Lots and lots of Anton Bruckner.

    And I would bet the bank that this work would be on there, too — Henryk Gorecki: Symphony 3 “Sorrowful Songs.” Music to listen to while mourning the loss of Pope John Paul II.

    And how about “R-E-S-P-E-C-T” by Aretha Franklin?

    This is fun. I may have to pull this thread out front!

  • Christine

    Darrell:

    Lots of Mozart, Beethoven and Bach.