Strippers in the pews — er, news

The strippers are back. Back at church. And back in the news.

Three weeks ago, I gave a mostly negative review to a Page A1 story in The Columbus Dispatch on strippers demonstrating outside an Ohio church that, for years, has protested their livelihood.

I liked parts of the Dispatch story but felt that it relied on cliches, presented the main characters as cardboard figures and failed miserably to explore the religion angles in any meaningful way.

Now comes a follow-up story on the same topic from The Associated Press:

WARSAW, Ohio – Strippers dressed in bikinis sunbathe in lawn chairs, their backs turned toward the gray clapboard church where men in ties and women in full-length skirts flock to Sunday morning services.

The strippers, fueled by Cheetos and nicotine, are protesting a fundamentalist Christian church whose Bible-brandishing congregants have picketed the club where they work. The dancers roll up with signs carrying messages adapted from Scripture, such as “Do unto others as you would have done unto you,” to counter church members who for four years have photographed license plates of patrons and asked them if their mothers and wives know their whereabouts.

The dueling demonstrations play out in central Ohio, where nine miles of cornfields and Amish-buggy crossing signs separate The Fox Hole strip club from New Beginnings Ministries.

Immediately, the AP description of how the church members were dressed impressed me as better than the way the Dispatch put it. For one thing, the AP’s “men in ties and women in full-length skirts” just sounds less pejorative than the Dispatch’s “polyester and pearls.” It also struck me as more accurate based on the video and photos I have seen of church members.

In general, the AP also eschews the cliche-ridden nature of the Dispatch piece, although not entirely. We do still get “Bible-brandishing congregants” and “a higher power” tasking the minister with shutting down the strip club. And a reference is made to churchgoers greeting the strippers with “both scorn and compassion,” although the story provides no evidence to back up the “scorn” assertion.

But in general, the AP story uses fresh language to show, not tell, the story — from the “nine miles of cornfields and Amish-buggy crossing signs” that separate the strip club from the church to the “mashed potatoes with gravy and Salisbury steak” served at the only sit-down restaurant in the small town. (Suddenly, I’m hungry!)

Basically, the AP reporter steps back and lets the story tell itself.

We get dialogue and description that help us better understand the figures on both sides. They are not cardboard characters. They are real people with nuanced and sometimes conflicting beliefs and positions.

You’ve got a pastor protesting but also offering to pay for food, rent, utilities and gas if the strippers will give up their lifestyle. You’ve got a stripper who says she made only $30 — instead of a normal couple hundred — on the last Friday that the church protested outside the club. These are not cliches. These are real, important details.

Consider this compelling section:

Laura Meske — known as Lola, stage age 36 but really 42 — hid behind a sign proclaiming, “Jesus loves the children of the world!” as the preacher extended his hand for a shake.

Two nights earlier, Dunfee and more than a dozen churchgoers stood outside the club, one of them calling out Meske’s stripper name.

“He who casts the first stone … ,” Meske said Sunday.

The pastor cut her off and repeated, “Lola, Lord bless you.”

“Everybody has sinned, and that doesn’t mean I’m not gonna get into heaven,” she said, the stud piercing in her chin shimmering in the sunlight. “I believe in Jesus. I don’t believe what they preach. They preach hate.”

Debi Durr, who attends the church, disagreed. “You don’t stand up there for four years for hate. That’s not hate. That’s love,” she said. Durr left Meske with a copy of Jeremiah 3:13 — a Bible passage that urges sinners to acknowledge their guilt.

AP also goes outside the two protesting groups and provides input from outside observers.

We hear from a former stripper who ministers to dancers, prostitutes and porn stars but doesn’t see protests outside the strip club as the right approach. A community values advocate, meanwhile, supports the protests but says the strip club has the legal right to operate. Finally, a leader of a church closer to the strip club explains why it takes a different approach than the one featured.

Context, it’s called. Thankfully, the AP story provides it. All in all, it’s an excellent 925-word report.

That’s not to say that it answered all my questions. Like the Dispatch, the AP failed to engage the religious issues to my satisfaction.

The church is labeled as “fundamentalist,” but no real insight into the theology or beliefs is provided. The reporter ventures inside the worship assembly as congregants sing “lyrics projected on a screen.” But no mention is made of the contents of those lyrics. Are they old-style hymns or contemporary Christian praise songs with seven-word choruses?

As with the Dispatch story, we hear vague pronouncements of belief in Jesus from the strippers but never really learn about their faith or the role it plays in their lives.

The strippers are back.

And once again, they brought a few religion ghosts with them.

Print Friendly

  • http://www.jonswerens.com Jon Swerens

    OK, I admit I changed the word “fundamentalist” to “evangelical” in the AP story we ran. The projector with lyrics made me doubt the fundamentalist label.

  • http://getreligion.org Bobby

    I wonder if they’re Pentecostal? I don’t find a church website when I Google but do see references to a New Beginnings Church of God in Warsaw, Ohio.

  • Passing By

    “Fundamentalist” has specific theological meaning within the history of American Christianity. I don’t mean to be rude, but comment #1 is as good a reflection of the journalisic problem as anything. What does projected hymn lyrics have to do with anything? I’ve seen that in a Catholic parish Mass. For that matter, three of the 5 fundamentals are Catholic dogma, and the other 2 don’t take too much tweaking to be compatible with Catholic doctrine.

    Which raises another problem: at this point, there is history which associates fundamentalism with particular American religious groups, which has little to do with projected hymns.

  • http://getreligion.org Bobby

    Passing By, I don’t mean to be rude either, but you’re referring to the wrong holy book. :-)

    Seriously, the AP Stylebook entry would seem to provide plenty of guidance for journalists (especially the AP itself):

    fundamentalist: The word gained usage in an early 20th century fundamentalist-modernist controversy within Protestantism. In recent years, however, fundamentalist has to a large extent taken on pejorative connotations except when applied to groups that stress strict, literal interpretations of Scripture and separation from other Christians.

    In general, do not use fundamentalist unless a group applies the word to itself.

    So unless this church specifically referred to itself as fundamentalist, that description should not have been used.

    Whether or not the projected lyrics contradict a fundamentalist label, I think the journalist’s instincts were right to question that label, although the meaning of “evangelical” can be difficult to pin down as well.

  • http://getreligion.org Bobby

    Of course, you weren’t referring to a holy book, but I took literary liberty …

  • Passing By

    You got me, Bobby. I’m busted!
    :-)

    I do agree with the change in wording, and the difficulties with “evangelical”. I’m in Texas, after all, not that far from Dallas Theological Seminary.

    It would be helpful to know if this congregation is part of The Church of God, Internation, which is pentecostal, or The Church of God of North America, which is not directly pentecostal, or this group, which has an interesting collections of beliefs. Without that piece of info, it’s hard to understand the religious perspective of the congregation.

  • Dave

    At least this story inserts the confrontational history early on, that the church “cast the first stone” by picketing the strip club before the showgirls ever appeared around the church. The previous story buried that.

  • kjs

    Passing By,

    They are definitely not that last group. Unfortunately, the other two don’t appear to have church directories – at least nothing straightforward. Could also be the Church of God (Cleveland, TN), or the Church of God of Prophecy, but nothing appears on their directories for this particular congregation. There are still other “Church of God” groups, too.

    Of course, this is assuming that Google Maps’ “New Beginnings Church of God” is even the correct name; the articles about the strippers have is as “New Beginnings Ministries church.” It could be unconnected to any particular organized denomination.

  • http://tds65.wordpress.com Tds65

    Great post, the title grabbed my attention that is why I stopped to read it.

  • http://www.samaritanxp.blogspot.com Ken Symes

    Bobby, excellent analysis of the variances in coverage between the Dispatch and AP. I too have reviewed the media coverage on this story and offered my own analysis and perspective. See Ken Symes’ blog post about the Strippers Protest.

    I’m very interested in getting some feedback. I’m a Christian who is seriously concerned about the actions of this church. There’s got to be something better for them to be doing in Warsaw, Ohio. I can’t believe this pastor feels justified in having members of the church down at this strip club every weekend now for 4 (FOUR!) years! Does he really think this is what Jesus what have this church to be doing? Jesus, of course, was labeled by people in his day as a “friend of sinners and prostitutes.” No worries about Pastor Bill Dunfee being labeled this way!