5Q+1: How Jeremy Lott is Real Clear

Get ready to add a new website to your daily reading list. So far at least, the Real Clear Religion website, a sister site to Real Clear Politics, is producing some quality religion news aggregation. Real Clear Religion editor Jeremy Lott explains the new site in a blog post.

Religion is serious and silly, scandalous and sublime. Religion writing ought to reflect this reality. Too often, it doesn’t. That’s a problem because religion is vitally important to billions of people the world over. It gives them a way to think about making sense of things, forming families, helping others, and helping themselves.

RealClearReligion.org aims to change this. We want to improve religion writing by highlighting the best of it, by giving interested parties a daily shortlist of news and commentary that they really ought to check out. We will cover religion in itself and religion as it influences those things that we can’t avoid: religion and science, religion and culture, religion and commerce, religion and politics.

Now that you have added the site to your bookmarks or RSS feeds and maybe “liked” the site on Facebook, we wanted to pick Lott’s brain about religion news.

First things first, here’s a short bio: Lott is the author of three books, most recently William F. Buckley (part of Thomas Nelson’s Christian Encounters series), and the recognized ghost for the autobiography of former Maryland governor Marvin Mandel. Lott, who is also associate editor of Real Clear Science, has worked at a number of think tanks and magazines, including the Cato Institute and The American Spectator as well as for, hold on to your hats, GetReligion. He lives in Fairfax, Va., and Lynden, Wash., and does not own a dog.

We’ve asked Lott to respond to our usual 5Q+1.

Where do you get your news about religion?
The short answer is everywhere. The long answer is, well, longer. The way the Real Clear websites work is that there’s a beta phase, where you, the editor, update a website regularly as if you had an audience. And then, at some point, you launch and start to attract an actual audience.

The beta prepares you for the launch in some ways. You get a good feel for what’s out there, what you should be reading regularly, what’s available in a pinch to round our your list ‘o links. But the dynamic also changes when you have readers. Then, people begin to forward and lobby for links.

I think that’s a good thing because, one, I can only read so much, and, two, it’s good to get readers involved in the process. Anybody should feel to drop me a note at jlott@realclearpolitics.com, though please don’t take it badly if I don’t answer.

One of the things that I find infuriating is when I read a good piece in a print periodical and then can’t find it online to link to it. Come on, publishers, get with the 21st century! Information wants to be free! Or at least, I want it to be.

What is the most important religion story right now that you think the mainstream media just do not get?
So many choices! I think the Ground Zero Mosque story stunned my fellow journalists because they don’t understand the deep ambivalence that many American have toward Islam. Bill O’Reilly said on The View that people objected to the mosque because Muslims killed Americans on 9/11. That was just beyond the pale. Rather than argue with him, two of the co-hosts walked off the set. There’s a great way to encourage constructive dialogue.

I’m way more of a dove than most Americans about Muslims, but I also do not buy this “religion of peace” line that George W. Bush turned into official US government policy. Islam is a religion that’s capable of peace, certainly. Sometimes for long historical stretches. But 9/11 and the riots that happen every time somebody threatens to draw a picture of Mohammad argue otherwise.

What is the story that you will be watching carefully in the next year or two?
I think the Glenn Beck-Mitt Romney story will be fascinating. Here you have the Tea Party that has just taken over American politics. It consists largely of conservative Protestants and Catholics but one of the big icons of the movement, Beck, is an unabashed Mormon.

Will Beck decide to back Romney out of solidarity or go against him for ideological reasons? If he opposes Romney, how will his fellow Mormons react? If he backs him, how will his largely evangelical audience react? Evangelicals have historically been extremely anti-Mormon. Could that change? We’ll find out.

Why is it important for journalists to understand the role of religion in our world today?
Trying to understand the world today without taking account of religion is a fool’s errand. You literally cannot make sense of much of history, including recent history, unless you are willing to grapple with the role played by religion. It’s like walking through a busy train station with a bag over your head.

What is the funniest, most ironic twist that you have seen in a religion news story lately?
My favorite story recently was about how Rev. Terry Jones got a free car for agreeing not to burn a Koran. This, of course, invites the obvious jokes about opportunism. Religious leaders of the world should know that there are literally thousands of your books that I will agree not to burn if you buy me a Can-Am Spyder Roadster.

But I do think that it also hints at the right kind of solution to some of our social conflicts. True, the Ground Zero Mosque folks — sorry, the two blocks from Ground Zero mosque folks –rejected Donald Trump’s overture. But just before 9/11 this year I had a piece in AOL News that argued mosque opponents should create a “move the mosque” fund. If thousands of people offered them tens of millions of dollars to move the building, say, eight blocks, it would be harder to say no.

BONUS: Do you have anything else you want to tell us about religion coverage in the mainstream news media?

Don’t get too attached to that idea of mainstream media. It’s all changing, and faster than you think.

Print Friendly

  • http://www.wildhunt.org/blog Jason Pitzl-Waters

    There doesn’t seem to be any RSS feeds to subscribe to. A pity, that’s usually how I keep track of religion news. Am I missing them? Can they not do RSS since they are playing with other people’s content?

  • Dan Crawford

    Well, it’s probably interesting to see how a political ideologue will cover religion as something worth considering in itself. I’m not so sure, given his enthusiasms, he will be be able to pull it off since it is apparent that he regards religion as a sub-set of politics – much as many of his liberal contemporaries do.

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    I’m a political idealogue only in the loosest sense of the term. That is, I follow politics and I have political opinions, and share some of them. There’s a lot of political content on the site right now because there’s this little election coming up.

  • Sarah Pulliam Bailey

    Jason, I posted the site into my google reader, and it came up just fine. Dan, it is a political site, so it will be interesting to see what kinds of articles are aggregated. That said, I’ve seen a huge mix so far, not just politics.

  • Sarah Pulliam Bailey

    What I mean is, its sister site Real Clear Politics is known for being political, so it might have some of those sensibilities, but I don’t think it’ll just center around politics.

  • Jerry

    Islam is a religion that’s capable of peace, certainly. Sometimes for long historical stretches. But 9/11 and the riots that happen every time somebody threatens to draw a picture of Mohammad argue otherwise.

    Wolves in sheep’s clothing are also known to Christianity. There is also a vast gap between how most Muslim scholars read the Quran and Hadith and the ignorance of many Muslims. Further, there is this prophecy recorded in Hadith where Muhammad said:

    The time is near in which nothing will remain of Islam but its name, and of the Kuran but its mere appearance, and the mosques of Muslims will be destitute of of knowledge and worship; and the learned will be the worst people under the heavens; and contention and strife will issue from them, and it will return upon themselves.

    That seems like a fulfilled prophecy to me.

    Here you have the Tea Party that has just taken over American politics.

    We live in totally different universes. Yours seems to be the media generated universe. And somehow a few victories in the Republican primaries got changed into a takeover of all politics. That’s no mean feat. I agree that the Tea Party is dominant in the media narrative, but the media narrative is not reality. In what I like to think of as the real world, their effect on next month’s election and 2012 is far from being settled.

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    I was speaking proleptically, as the question encouraged me to do.

  • Jake M

    The Beck-Romney issue is a no-go. If this man really knew what he was talking about he would know there isn’t really a story here. Beck isn’t a Mormon ideologue, so he won’t back someone just based on their faith. Also, Romney instituted mandatory health care coverage in Massachusetts which, according to a friend who is a former resident of the state, created the “Safe Auto” equivalent of health insurance in the state. This is something Mr. Beck would be greatly opposed to.

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    I didn’t call Beck a “Mormon ideologue,” I called him a Mormon and suggested that his religious affiliation and his ideology could be at loggerheads here.

  • Jerry

    Jeremy, You got me to go to the dictionary with proleptically :-)

    If you had worded your sentence with “I expect…” or something like that, I would not have reacted. The wording suggested a certainty to me, so I reacted to your words not to your answer in the context of the question.

    I should have also said that I appreciate the attempt you’re making to highlight the good stories. I’ve felt that GR overly focuses on the negative and have longed for someone to point out the best stories. I hope you’ll not only point out the best stories, but also inspiring ones such as http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/21/man-saved-by-god-and-by-dog-who-says-grace/

  • http://jettboy.blogspot.com Jettboy

    “I didn’t call Beck a ‘Mormon ideologue,’ I called him a Mormon and suggested that his religious affiliation and his ideology could be at loggerheads here”

    Then you don’t understand Mormons very much outside of the stereotypes. It is true that Mormons will support Mormons, but only so far. There is no loggerhead where politics and ethics are concerned. Besides, Glenn Beck has already on more than one occasion stated he does NOT support Romney. Your “wondering,” other than perhaps finding the sources for this, is no longer valid.

    As stated by Lowell at: http://www.article6blog.com/2010/10/18/meddling-in-the-other-partys-primary-gays-think-they-are-god-romneys-strategy-and-more/

    “That Idaho Statesmen article John cites, about Romney’s endorsement of a Catholic Republican over a Mormon Democrat, is simply wonderful on several levels. One is the sheer ordinariness of the story. I’ve been watching Mormon politicians do battle that way all my life. They want to win elections, not win one for the “Mormon team.” It’s as simple as that. Another more important level is that newcomers to Intermountain West politics — especially the coastal news media — don’t get that at all. To them Mormons are just one big clan. I am here to tell you, it ain’t so.”

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    We’ll see about that.

  • Jeffrey

    This seems like a great effort, but Jeremy desparately needs to expand the resources he is consulting. The stories lean heavily from conservative publications and perspectives. For every post from Religion Dispatches, there are ten from the Daily Caller, GetReligion, or the Weekly Standard.

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    And also National Catholic Reporter, Slate, Salon, Commonweal, Huffington Post, the Guardian, Christian Century, CNN, and the New York Times, to name a few. Feel free to suggest articles, but charges of bias won’t win you any points.

  • Jeffrey

    Right now, you have 12 stories on your Saturday list. Half are from conservative sources. Two are from a liberal sources (3 if you count NCReporter, but Allen makes it neutral to conservative). The traditional press is represented by stories about Evangelicals and Mormons, a conflict between Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews, and concerns about a Canadian issue,

    That is heavy tilt towards conservative sources and conservative religious believers. Maybe that’s not a bias, but it’s something to at least consider.

    As for suggestions beyond your current Twitter feed, maybe:

    http://blog.sojo.net/2010/10/22/abuses-of-faith-in-this-election-season/

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-yancey/what-good-is-god_b_772236.html

    http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/10/23/2570094/ritsch-the-church-must-admit-its.html

  • http://www.realclearreligion.org Jeremy Lott

    I don’t Twitter, or Tweet, or whatever the kids are calling it these days, but you got 2 out of 3 for Monday.