Xmas Star Wars (‘Happy Life Day!’)

No, not that star.

This one, sort of.

GetReligion readers who pay close attention to church-state issues this time of year — also known as the “Christmas wars” — just knew that this story was coming. Actually, in this case we are talking about a specific battle in the larger war that breaks out every year in mid-November, or thereabouts. It’s the battle over the creche in the public square (usually a civic lawn).

I am referring to the Supreme Court instructions establishing the concept of equal access for “holiday” decorations. As I put this in a Scripps Howard column several years ago, which focused on the concept of a “secular” Menorah:

We live in an age in which government officials — local, state and national — are wrestling with holiday trees, menorahs, creches, angels, ears of corn, Santa statues, plastic snowmen and a host of other secular and sacred objects that church-state partisans keep dragging into the public square. …

There are few guidelines carved in stone. The court did establish what many activists call the “reindeer rules” that allow displays of religious symbols on public property as long as they are surrounded by other symbols, which are usually borrowed from pop culture.

Pop culture? Actually, I was referring to that reindeer allegedly named Rudolph, Santa Claus (with elves) and similar figures.

But now we have this development, which is completely logical in light of recent developments over in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Let us turn to the Washington Post for an update:

For half a century, a decorated Christmas tree and a Nativity scene have stood on the grounds of Loudoun’s courthouse every holiday season, a defining element of the county’s holiday celebration. In recent years, the traditional Christian symbols have been joined by displays of symbols from the Jewish, Muslim and Sikh faiths.

Now, after a long and heated debate that began last year over the legality and management of religious displays on the courthouse’s public grounds, 10 holiday displays are on view this month: a Christmas tree, three manger scenes, five atheist displays and a mannequin arrangement featuring “the chosen one,” Luke Skywalker of “Star Wars.”

It’s a complicated and quite substantial story. That’s a compliment.

As always, some Christians and some atheists in this battle are firing the key shots in an old, old war. In this case, what really interests me in this story is this question: How is this first come, first served approach is working in other parts of the nation?

It’s a sad story, but a real one. For those who don’t know my point of view, I think that the civic lawns should be totally bare. Then Christian clergy and laypeople could lobby others to put creches on the lawns of dozens or hundreds of their churches and the front lawns of thousands of believers. Light up the whole town, if that’s the goal.

As always, the solution to most issues of free speech is more free speech.

So put up a Nativity scene — I vote for Dec. 24-Jan. 6 — on a lawn that you legally control. Invite reporters and camera crews, if you wish. Don’t invite the lawyers. Give their fees to needy families. And please avoid all temptations to sponsor civic celebrations of “Happy Life Day.”

Just saying.

Print Friendly

About TMatt

Terry Mattingly directs the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. He writes a weekly column for the Scripps Howard News Service.

  • Stoo

    If it helps, even most Star Wars fans try to pretend the Holiday Special never happened.

  • Marie

    Oh, My! I never new that Star Wars Special existed. Now that I do know, I’ll try to pretend that I don’t.

  • Sibyl

    Thank God Charles Schultz and his collaborators on ‘A Charlie Brown Christmas’ was made in the days before the PC Thought Police became the public nuisance #1 that they are today.

    It wouldn’t stand a chance now and CocaCola probably would not sponsor it….one world religion, sexual justice, green climate change environmentalism or no religion at all are the approved philosophies these days.

  • Stoo

    You must lead a very lucky life if Political Correctness is the number one nuisance you face.

  • Passing By

    This may be off topic, but we had an interesting public square vs. religion kerfluffle around here this year, that just happened to fall at Christmas time.

    Our local bus company took advertising from an atheist group that wanted us to know how good they are, albeit without God. This (excellent in my opinion – note the quotes) article laid out the issues. Then, we got a Christian boycott by African-American preachers, who are, after all, more representative of those folks who ride the bus than atheists (white, middle-class, at least the ones I know). The New York Times weighed in, and the outcome was the transit agency banned religious advertising of any kind.

    Which is a loss, I think. Here’s the connection I see: people – religious and anti-religious alike – seem to fear debate. Either you ban the debate, as in the local situation, or you trivialize it by stupid (Star Wars, indeed!) displays. Look at the picture in the NYT article: the proper response (one anyway) was to follow the city buses around with a counter-ad.

    Like I say, I hope this isn’t too far afield.

  • http://ingles.homeunix.net/ Ray Ingles

    Hi, Passing By – I’m a white middle-class atheist who rides the bus. Not in Fort Worth, I admit, but in Detroit. Should bus ad space only be available to patrons, BTW?

  • Passing By

    No doubt you are, Mr. Ingles, but around here riding the bus is pretty much a class and ethnic thing. I didn’t agree with the Christian boycott, but I did enjoy a bunch of black men standing up to self-satisfied white folks.

    Bus advertising space should be generally available to anyone willing to pay for it, barring pornographic and libelous content. Unfortunately, faith (including anti-faith) is now barred from this setting, and, as I said, that’s a loss. The ministers got played and the public square is more impoverished.

  • http://ingles.homeunix.net/ Ray Ingles

    Passing By – And you know the “white folks” were “self-satisfied” because…

  • Passing By

    Running ads touting your own goodness is one measure, I suppose. The comments under the Star-Telegram are instructive in that regard.

    Clearly, you Brights are deeply disturbed when people disagree with you.