West Point cadet quits, citing religion

I’ve long been fascinated by stories about religious practice at the service academies. My brother attended the Air Force Academy in the 1990s and the religious pressure there was quite strong. His commanders didn’t quite accept that the generic Protestant service at the beautiful chapel there wouldn’t quite work for him (Missouri-Synod Lutherans don’t worship in a unionistic manner). They were suspicious as to why he needed to go off base for Divine Service, etc.

My father-in-law attended the Naval Academy (class of ’58) and told us stories of how midshipmen would try to get out of weekend worship by claiming religions without a local presence — only to find out that the academy would go to extremes to get them to a mosque or Theosophist center or what not many miles away.

Frequently stories about violations of the separation of church and state at military academies focus on the complainant’s claim, as they should. Sometimes this is at the expense of the possible complications at play. So I wanted to highlight this Associated Press story that I thought handled everything with a very nice balance. It begins:

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — A cadet quitting West Point less than six months before graduation says he could no longer be part of a culture that promotes prayers and religious activities and disrespects nonreligious cadets.

Blake Page announced his decision to quit the U.S. Military Academy this week in a much-discussed online post that echoed the sentiments of soldiers and airmen at other military installations. The 24-year-old told The Associated Press that a determination this semester that he could not become an officer because of clinical depression played a role in his public protest against what he calls the unconstitutional prevalence of religion in the military.

Quitting six months before graduation is almost unheard of at military academies. A big part of that is because, after a window that closes before your second year is completed, you usually pay a penalty. The information about Page not being able to be an officer is crucial, and it’s good to put it up at the top. But I like how the reporter simply mentioned it, described the role it played according to the student, and didn’t try to say that this aspect of the story invalidates the claim.

The article gives us specifics about Page’s complaints — jokes about nonreligious cadets being called heathens at basic training, an officer telling him he needed to fill the hole in his heart. He criticizes the leadership of West Point, calling them “criminals” for allowing these things to happen.

We also hear from folks at West Point who dispute the allegations, including citing the academy’s Secular Student Alliance, where Page was president. The article goes ahead and speaks with members of that club to see what they have to say:

Maj. Nicholas Utzig, the faculty adviser to the secular club, said he doesn’t doubt some of the moments Page described, but he doesn’t believe there is systematic discrimination against nonreligious cadets.

“I think it represents his own personal experience and perhaps it might not be as universal as he suggests,” said Utzig, who teaches English literature.

One of Page’s secularist classmates went further, calling his characterization of West Point unfair.

“I think it’s true that the majority of West Point cadets are of a very conservative, Christian orientation,” said senior cadet Andrew Houchin. “I don’t think that’s unique to West Point. But more broadly, I’ve never had that even be a problem with those of us who are secular.”

The article goes on to discuss the problems the Air Force Academy has had with church and state issues, pointing out that a retired four-star general was asked to conduct an independent review of the religious climate there. The article also discusses the rise in acceptance of atheists, agnostics and humanists in the military.

It’s then that we learn that Page is involved with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, led by Mikey Weinstein. Weinstein is then quoted about “fanatical religiosity” in the military, comparing Page’s courage to that of Rosa Parks. It’s great to quote Weinstein, but I liked that his quotes came toward the end of the story. Frequently the stories we see about this issue are dominated by Weinstein, who is a significant actor in the movement.

The story wraps up with final details about Page’s honorary discharge, including that he will pay no penalty in terms of military commitment or reimbursement for his education costs. We also learn that Page says his depression worsened after his father’s suicide last year. The story ends with Page’s quote that he hopes to spend the rest of his life as an activist on the role of religion in the military.

Very well done. It handles a number of delicate issues with care for all involved and you can come away from the complicated story with an understanding of a multitude of different perspectives. Perhaps, you could argue, there should be more perspective from the folks who are accused of unconstitutional behavior. And that’s a fair point. But given the space constraints, I rather liked how much was fleshed out by focusing in on the secularist community.

Image of West Point cadets via Spirit of America/Shutterstock.

  • http://areformedcatholicinthepcusa.blogspot.com Reformed Catholic

    I actually think this is more the reason why he resigned:

    “West Point confirmed that it approved his resignation and that Page had been meeting the academic standards and was not undergoing any disciplinary actions. Page said he had been medically disqualified this semester from receiving a commission in the Army as a second lieutenant – like his classmates will receive in May – because of clinical depression and anxiety. He said his condition has gotten worse since his father killed himself last year.”

    The fact that he got an ‘Honorable Discharge” (not honorary ) and that he’s not having to pay back costs is more telling that he left due to his medically diagnosed depression, not due to any sort of ‘overt’ religious pressure.

    If he had resigned for any other reason, he’d be paying for the schooling. That should have been looked into closer.

  • Parker

    As a Naval Academy graduate (class of ’05), and, presumably, a “criminal who has violated the constitution,” I actually found this to be a very interesting topic. I liked that they talked to the secular professor, and students. The only things I didn’t care for in the article was the fact that they didn’t talk to a chaplain. That seems like it would have been the obvious choice.
    I also thought it was a little disingenuous to discuss the penalties for dropping out of a service academy, when it seems like he actually got a medical discharge. A completely different issue.

  • http://fkclinic.blogspot.com tioedong

    heh. He should try being a woman in medical schools when only 5% of students were women.

    Yet this brings up another question: bullying. Folks can be bullied for all sorts of reasons, from being overweight to wearing glasses. Did the harassment consist of a few remarks, was it part of a culture of harassment led by teachers, or did it rise to a systemic level of bullying? There is a difference.

    another question: If he is 24, isn’t he a bit old? Usually one graduates from college at 22…

    And did they compare the level of “religious” bullying here with the level of anti religious bullying that is common in other institutions?

  • northcoast

    If they weren’t going to recommend him to be commissioned, why should he be expected to complete the term? Knowing he would graduate without the commission would create barriers and certainly couldn’t improve his mental state. Isn’t getting the commission the purpose of going to the Academy?

  • Parker

    I believe that he was prior enlisted, so being around 24 at graduation wouldn’t be that unusual. You can be as old as 27 (actually the rule is, you have to be under 23 on the first day of Plebe summer).
    Thinking back, I guess the media missed a major point here in the fact that he was getting a medical discharge. I realize that it’s not the media’s to do this too much, but they could have made a point about the fact that he was on his way out for medical reasons, and already didn’t owe the government anything. o The article makes it seem like he’s actually leaving because of the religious issue, but if he’s discharged for medical reasons, then it seems more likely that he’s taking writing this letter on his way out because of his feelings, but is actually leaving involuntarily for medical purposes. Big difference.
    I did think that by interviewing the faculty advisor for the secular organization, and another secular student, other than the one that wrote the letter, they did a good job of addressing whether there was a prevailing culture on the campus or not.

  • northcoast

    A lingering question for me would be about Mr. Page’s options if he completed the program at the Academy. Would he then have been obligated to serve a term of enlistment as a sergeant?

    When I was in the Army I knew a couple of young men who had completed most or all of the tough Officer Candidate School and returned to service with the rank of private. To my layman’s eye one of them seemed to handle it all, but the other one seemed to be rather fragile emotionally.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X