Any reporters out there still studying Pope Francis?

YouTube Preview Image

This whole GetReligion operation, as regular readers know, exists to look at the good and the bad in the mainstream media’s attempts to cover religion news, events and trends.

Thus, we spend very little time focusing on essays published in advocacy journalism outlets.

Thus, we spend very little time focusing on coverage in religious publications that grind out news and information about individual religious flocks.

Thus, we spend very little time focusing on first-person journalism, since that often — but not always — is linked to journalism produced in a more “European,” opinion-driven style (see rule No. 1).

However, there are always exceptions to the rules. One of the most common exceptions is when we find first-person essays that are directly linked to the state of religion news coverage. There are also times when we come across a piece written by a world-class expert on some aspect of religion that we simply cannot imagine religion-beat professionals, and those who appreciate the subjects addressed by religion-beat professionals, would not wanting to read.

That is the case with the National Catholic Reporter piece that ran the other day by — naturally enough — the omnipresent John L. Allen Jr.

While armies of reporters are following each and every symbolic Vatican move made by Pope Francis, Allen hopped a plane and headed over to Buenos Aires to produce a piece with this logical headline: “Who Francis may be based on who Bergoglio was.”

It contains all kinds of information and quotes from real people who have watched the this quiet man for decades. Allen lets them talk, which means that when it comes time to sum up their words into observations and predictions about the new pope, it is highly likely that readers are going to believe him.

Religion-news junkies are going to want to read it all, but, in particular, I thought GetReligion readers would appreciate a few passages in which Allen shreds some of the early attempts to pin a simplistic label on Francis.

… It’s clear that despite the insta-hagiography that always surrounds a new pope, Bergoglio was hardly a cultural icon in Argentina before his election. He kept a low profile, and many Argentines say they’re getting to know him only now along with the rest of the world. …

It also seems clear that Bergoglio wasn’t perfect, despite the fact that it’s hard right now to find many Argentines willing to say so out loud. For instance, vocations to the priesthood have been falling in Buenos Aires on his watch, despite the fact they’re up in some other dioceses. Last year the archdiocese ordained just 12 new priests, as opposed to 40-50 per year when Bergoglio took over. (For the record, people say that Bergoglio did his best to support his priests and seminarians, taking a special interest in seminary life.)

The future pope also certainly had his critics. Some conservatives grouse that he was too committed to the social gospel and not enough to proclaiming the faith; some liberals saw him as an enemy of liberation theology and social emancipation. Others say Bergoglio could come off as fairly inscrutable and a bit “political.”

More than once, I heard a version of the following quip: “I didn’t know what he was really thinking … he is a Jesuit, you know!”

And the ultimate takeaway from this first-person study? Here are two of Allen’s conclusions, in abbreviated form:

First, there seems universal agreement that the heart of Francis’ pastoral vision is a desire for a missionary church, a church that moves out into the streets to meet people where they are and to respond to their real needs, both human and spiritual. Over and over again, people who’ve lived and worked with Bergoglio cite some version of two of his favorite sayings:

“A church that stays in the sacristy too long gets sick” — the idea being that remaining in an enclosed space, constantly breathing the same recycled stale air, is bad for the church’s health. The church needs to get out into the wider world in order to stay vital and alive.

“Teachers of the faith need to get out of their cave” — meaning that preaching to the choir is not the heart of the missionary enterprise, but rather making the faith relevant to people on the outside.

In other words, Bergoglio didn’t want his priests studying the slums, visiting the slums or preaching about the slums. He wanted them living there and ministering there — around the clock. The new pope’s commitment to simplicity is not a style thing, instead “his opening act is a whole program of governance in miniature.”

Second, it is very hard — in the context of Argentina — to label the new pope as a “conservative” in any sense other than basic doctrine. Remember that Allen is writing in an openly liberal Catholic publication.

Bergoglio is one of the least ideological people you’ll ever meet, more interested in concrete situations than in grand political theories. The most serious opposition to Bergoglio from within the Catholic fold in Argentina consistently came from the right, not the left. …

Perhaps the most interesting read on where Bergoglio stands came from Juan Carr, a renowned social activist in Argentina and a 2012 Nobel Peace Prize nominee.

In Latin American Catholicism, he told me April 3, “I’ve noticed a growing split between a church completely focused on the spiritual side, and a church that’s completely committed to the social issues but without addressing the devotional needs of the people.”

“Bergoglio is a rare figure who transcends that divide, embracing both.”

The pope, in the end, is a man who likes to gather his own information, draw his own conclusions and then make his own decisions. Observers should not be surprised if some of his decisions are quite bold.

If you are interested in the new pope, this is must reading — no matter what side of the computer keyboard or reporter’s notepad you occupy.

Print Friendly

About tmatt

Terry Mattingly directs the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. He writes a weekly column for the Universal Syndicate.

  • FW Ken

    Allen seems to have thought that the pope was making shallow symbolic gestures to be followed up by the real stuff of curial appointments. Then he’s surprised that these initial acts are intrinsic to the pope’s theology and character. Am I reading that right? Is Allen being coy? Playing to his NCRep audience? That doesn’t seem like John Allen.

    It should also be noted that the description of his talk with Abp. Muller omits the part where he said that he wishes the CDF to continue Benedict’s policies . The narrative going around seems to be that Francis will be aggressive where Benedict wasn’t.

  • Jerry

    First, what a misleading headline on this post. It was disconnected from the actual content.

    To my main point: I appreciated John Allen’s story on a day when my google news screen for “Pope Francis” turned up this story which was about how Margaret Thatcher, Pope Francis and some others had all studied chemistry, of all things: Thatcher, other luminaries tried chemistry before their careers crystallized http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-talk-margaret-thatcher-chemist-20130409,0,5441926.story I guess I’m in rarefied company since I also have an MS in Chemistry :-)

  • Julia

    Glad you noticed, but actually John Allen is doing a series of posts on what he is discovering in Buenas Aires.
    He has also interviewed Francis’ official spokesman while he was Archbishop, his sister, the head of a vast program to help in the slums and the parishioners in a big slum where Francis was frequently present without any fanfare. Mr Allen is in a class of one – he deserves a Pulitzer.

    To see his series of pieces from BA: http://ncronline.org/authors/john-l-allen-jr

  • gerg

    You know what is interesting? The media have said almost nothing about Bergoglio’s record as to the sex abuse scandal in Argentina. Sure, there has been a paragraph or two in some stories, saying basically this: “He made some mistakes early on, but later became much more strict on the matter”. But there have been no in depth investigations, no long stories laying out all the facts etc.
    Here is what is going to happen – so long as Francis does things that are perceived as “liberal” there will be no stories on this subject. As soon as he starts opposing gay marriage, all of a sudden, we will be treated to a slew of stories telling us what a bad job Francis did in Argentina.
    He probably did a better than average job in this matter. But if he suddenly becomes a “conservative” the media will go hunting for him, and his record will be skewed in such a manner that he will look like a bad guy.
    Let’s watch and wait.

  • Jerry

    Gerg is wrong about lengthy stories. I found at least one: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/pope-francis-was-often-quiet-on-argentine-sex-abuse-cases-as-archbishop/2013/03/18/26e7eca4-8ff6-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story_1.html

    Beyond that, I do agree that the media is still bemused by the Pope as evidenced by this business media (!) story:Pope Francis Teddy, World’s Holiest Bear, for Sale http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/455252/20130409/pope-teddy-pictures.htm

  • Julia

    There was a Benedict Teddy, as well; made by some German toy company.

    This following 2 statements at that business site is typical of the efforts to make this Pope look good as compared to Benedict. In fact, Benedict really did not dress much differently than Paul VI, JPI or JPII.
    But the story points out that the bear’s lack of the traditional red capelet says somethibng really good about Francis as opposed to maybe a thousand years of Popes before him. Wearing that red cape or red shoes were not about pride in oneself; ergo not wearing them does not signify humbleness. The Pope’s garb often has symbolic elements related to his office – not to him personally. He may think it’s time to go in a different direction with official papal ceremonial wear, but that doesn’t mean he’s thumbing his nose at his predecessors. I think we need a real thinking-through of what “humble” means these days in this relatively Puritan and Calvinist country as opposed to what “humble” means in Europe where folks are used to seeing all kinds of elaborate regalia for many different professions and political office-holders. After all, this is the first non-European Pope in a very, very long time.

    “It was intended to be signal of his more humble tastes in papal dress, after Benedict XVI’s focus on tradition and associated style trappings. The Benedict bear’s red mozzetta (the short cape) worn across the shoulders is absent from the Francis.”


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X