MTV: Rowling answers God question

JK RowlingMany theories have been tossed around for why Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling avoided discussing religion and her books. One of the more popular theories was that she didn’t want to be typecast or shunned for any personal views that could affect books sales.

The answer, it seems, is a lot simpler. Rowling, according to an article by MTV.com’s Shawn Adler, wanted to avoid giving away the book’s ending to perceptive fans who, if they knew for sure the book had intentional religious parallels, would spot certain themes and trends and ruin all the fun.

Of course the book has Christian images, “almost epitomize the whole series,” Rowling now says. Like, duh!

What’s most interesting about the story, though, is what Rowling reveals about herself:

But if she was worried about tipping her hand narratively in the earlier books, she clearly wasn’t by the time Harry visits his parents’ graves in Chapter 16 of “Deathly Hallows,” titled “Godric’s Hollow.” On his parents’ tombstone he reads the quote “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death,” while on another tombstone (that of Dumbledore’s mother and sister) he reads, “Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”

While Rowling said that “Hogwarts is a multifaith school,” these quotes, of course, are distinctly Christian. The second is a direct quote of Jesus from Matthew 6:19, the first from 1 Corinthians 15:26. As Hermione tells Harry shortly after he sees the graves, his parents’ message means “living beyond death. Living after death.” It is one of the central foundations of resurrection theology. …

But while the book begins with a quote on the immortal soul — and though Harry finds peace with his own death at the end of his journey — it is the struggle itself which mirrors Rowling’s own, the author said.

“The truth is that, like Graham Greene, my faith is sometimes that my faith will return. It’s something I struggle with a lot,” she revealed. “On any given moment if you asked me [if] I believe in life after death, I think if you polled me regularly through the week, I think I would come down on the side of yes — that I do believe in life after death. [But] it’s something that I wrestle with a lot. It preoccupies me a lot, and I think that’s very obvious within the books.”

Will other media outlets pick this story up? Rowling, is after all, on a publicity tour. The general idea of those is to pick up media attention, and the big media outlets are not always jumping to publish the latest celebrity gossip. Oh wait — never mind.

In all seriousness, the media coverage this story gets in the next couple of days will be telling. How many times has a Harry Potter book made the front page of USA Today or the cover of one of the big three news magazines? Local newspapers eat the story up when the books come out, often assigning a features writer to get an embargoed copy of the book, read it in one night, and write a review for the day the book goes on sale. Will Rowling’s resolving the religion issue make it beyond the celebrity-entertainment sections of the papers?

The MTV.com story isn’t without its own barbs. See the final few paragraphs, which are more than likely to get a certain number of people excited:

That, by the author’s own acknowledgement, “Harry Potter” deals extensively with Christian themes may be somewhat ironic, considering that many Christian leaders have denounced the series for glamorizing witchcraft. When he was known simply as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Pope himself condemned the books, writing that their “subtle seductions, which act unnoticed … deeply distort Christianity in the soul before it can grow properly.”

For her part, Rowling said she’s proud to be on numerous banned-book lists. As for the protests of some believers? Well, she doesn’t take them as gospel.

“I go to church myself,” she declared. “I don’t take any responsibility for the lunatic fringes of my own religion.”

Terry has been saying for years that the books are shaped by “a Church of Scotland communicant whose faith has helped shape her work.” In fact if you look at portions of his August 1 column, you’ll see that Rowling confirms some of his predictions in a somewhat eerie fashion.

Print Friendly

  • Paul Frey

    Of course Tmatt was way ahead. Thankfully, he’s well versed in the other ‘sacred writings” (Lewis, Tolkien, L’Engle, and others), and could thus recognize the thread of divine imagery and occasional allegory in Harry Potter. To those who are worried about the supposed magic and wizardry in the books I say “Riddikulus!” (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 7) Read away and feed your imagination with a fun, well crafted, and ultimately hope filled tale.

  • http://www.ecben.net Will

    So, just who are these “many Christian leaders”? As the saying goes, “Name three!”. The “Pope condemns Harry Potter” crock has been discussed to death in the comboxes of St. Blog’s.
    And “she doesn’t take them as gospel”, huh, huh, how clever We are.

    So as not to confine potshots to the mass media: The UNauthorized Guide (whose author and title I have thankfully forgotten) tells us that Rowling is “an attendant of the Church of Scotland”. I guess she has a day job at St. Giles, taking care of the instruments of the eucharist. It also identifies Hagrid’s lower-class English accent as “a Scotch brogue”.

  • http://rub-a-dub.blogspot.com Mattk

    Colson and Dobson are two.
    But two isn’t many.
    unless you are a wizard trying to get dwarfs into Beorn’s… Oh, nevermind.

  • Pingback: JK Rowling talks about faith and Harry Potter

  • http://www.HogwartsProfessor.com John Granger

    TMatt sent me a link to this story today and I have written at length about it at http://www.HogwartsProfessor.com. Here I just want to ask a question; did you mean to suggest that TMatt was making predictions about the books in his 1 August column? The column came out more than a week after the last book was published. If he was making predictions — and he knows his English literature well enough, as others have noted, to have made some good ones — he had an unfair advantage in August!

  • http://www.HogwartsProfessor.com John Granger

    My mistake. Daniel was saying Ms. Rowling’s comments today confirmed what he predicyed in August. My apologies to Daniel for typing before thinking.

  • Jerry

    typing before thinking.

    is a sin many of us, myself included, have committed.

    Over two years ago, a Harry Potter fan web site http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/ had a poll on the underlying theme of the stories. The top three had obvious religious implications:

    …choices (“It is our choices Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities”)

    love conquers evil

    do what is right over what is easy

    So this story was to me a confirmation that the fans understood very well the underlying spiritual themes.

  • Pingback: Pseudo-Polymath » Blog Archive » Thursday Highlights

  • Ron Troup

    I’m puzzled by your reference to Colson. As I recall, Chuck Colson came out in “Christianity Today” with a defense of the Potter books quite a few years ago; and the editor of CT also supported the books in an editorial.

  • Alex

    One does wonder if Rowling tithes… ;-) (That’d be a nice problem for a church to have.)

    This is excellent news, blows a hole through Lev Grossman’s pronouncements, and totally blindsides the conventional wisdom of our day that in order to do great, culturally moving things, you have to be anti-Christian, or, at least, irreligious.

  • Trierr

    So, how does the big news last night affect the coverage of Rowlings and religion?

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/50787

  • Dan

    Had her books been branded as overtly Christian, reviews would have turned against her.

    That’s a fact.

    If

  • Nathan

    So how do we factor in Dumbledore’s homosexuality into this?

    link