Covering the other polygamy

3 wedding bandsWhile the news media has been focused on the sensational story of a breakaway Mormon fundamentalist denomination and its practice of polygamous marriage and allegations of child abuse, National Public Radio produced a solid two-part series this week on another significant religious tradition in the United States that allows for polygamy.

Muslims do not widely practice polygamy and in many cases its discourages from a practical standpoint. But one estimate puts the number at 1-3 percent of the 1-1.8 billion Muslims worldwide, which is no small number if you do the math. There are estimates of 50,000 to 100,000 Muslims in the United States living in polygamous marriages, according to the NPR series.

The Muslim faith also places some hefty requirements on men considering marriage to more than one woman (women cannot marry more than one man in Islam) that may be interpreted differently depending on who you listen to. Here is how NPR described those views:

Abdullah says polygamy in Islam dates back to the 7th century, when battles were killing off Muslim men and leaving widows and children unprotected.

As a result, Abdullah says, the Koran specifies that a man can marry “women of your choice: two, three, four, and if you fear you cannot be just, then marry one.”

“And so, a lot of scholars look at it sequentially,” he says. “Two is optimum, then three, then four, then as a last resort, one!”

This is not the only perspective on the Koran’s regulations of polygamy. Islam is a big religion, and views will differ within the faith. Here is the viewpoint I have seen more often:

Sarah begins to cry. Others nod in sympathy. These women are all Muslim. The Koran states that men may marry up to four women. The Prophet Mohammad had multiple wives.

But there’s a restriction, says Sally, another group member. The husband cannot favor one woman over another — with his wealth or his heart.

“You have to love them the same way, share everything the same way, equally,” says Sally. “Nobody can do that. It’s impossible.”

Since it’s impossible to treat two women the same, a Muslim man should not even try to. Apparently that argument doesn’t discourage all Muslims. And equality between wives is not always observed and sometimes leads to abuse, the article notes.

This is a difficult story to tell. Correspondent Barbara Bradley Hagerty’s reporting demonstrates the challenge of getting people to talk about something about which they are normally very quiet because of laws against polygamy. One husband with two wives refused to be interviewed, although his second wife is interviewed extensively.

Hagerty quotes a Muslim woman saying that every woman would prefer to be married to a man as his only wife. Another says that life is easier for second wives than it is for first wives.

With persistence and time, Hagerty was able to tell a tremendous story of what life is like in polygamous marriages from the perspective of first wives, second wives and husbands. Many diverse viewpoints were put forward, from the opinion that polygamous marriages help build up society and give children a father they otherwise wouldn’t have, to the heartbreak a 40-year-old first wife felt when her 43-year-old husband married a 30-year-old woman.

Somehow, I sense that the issue of polygamy will not go away. Perhaps if journalists did a better job covering the FLDS group before their leader was under prosecution, the current mess in Texas would not have played out the way it has.

The United States is a diverse place with many groups believing and practicing many things. Journalists should be open to that and cover as many of those groups as objectively as possible.

Print Friendly

  • Michael

    Perhaps if journalists did a better job covering the FLDS group before their leader was under prosecution, the current mess in Texas would not have played out the way it has.

    In what sense?

  • http://www.getreligion.org/?p=2677 dpulliam

    Coverage that does not portray them in a weird alien-like manner that focuses on their atypical style of dress and fashion. Good coverage would present these groups objectively and seriously, not as an oddity.

    The problem is that the FLDS group only started getting national coverage when their leader was busted on criminal charges. That makes a journalist’s job that much harder since there was not much precedent for serious straightforward journalism about the group and how their religion shapes their unique culture.

  • http://ontheotherfoot.blogspot.com Joel

    The Bible’s position makes more sense to me: No man can serve two masters. :)

  • http://knapsack.blogspot.com Jeff

    So, what we’re learning here is that there may be barely 30,000 people living in various LDS splinter groups in polygamous families, while American Islam accounts for 50 to 100,000 folks in such circumstances?

    That alone is interesting; obviously, the arrest of Warren Jeffs put more of a spotlight on the FLDS segment, and living in a compound is mildly peculiar to Americans whether your compound is in Waco, over by Hyannisport, or up around the Idaho-Canada border.

    So i’m assuming it’s the lack of visible clustering that keeps the Islamic side of the phenomenon out of the limelight — or is it the fact that the Islamic folk do have some enclaves, but they speak a different language and are even more resistant to outside viewing than even the FLDS are? I know there is an Islamic enclave or two around the US (near Abiquiu, NM for one), but have no idea who practices polygamy. That’d be a story worth pursuing.

  • Pingback: ADF Alliance Alert » Covering the other polygamy

  • Michael

    As more stories like this get reported, I wonder if there will be allegations that the press is trying to “normalize” polygamy. It was (and is) an allegation made regarding same-sex marriage and many marriage advocates argued that when there were originally stories about the HBO show “Big Love.”

    How will Maggie Gallagher respond to stories that appear to “normalize” polygamy? How will the conservative press handle polygamy, since the move to normalize it is coming from within its own ranks: religious conservatives.

  • Stephen A.

    How will the conservative press handle polygamy, since the move to normalize it is coming from within its own ranks: religious conservatives.

    Did we all miss the large outpouring of support for polygamy among religious conservatives?