Exiting the thriving evangelical pews?

1stbaptist 2If you’ve been following our coverage of the debates about Gov. Sarah Palin and her faith, you know that many people do not know what label to stick on her. Is she a “fundamentalist”? Is she a “Pentecostal” Christian? A “charismatic”? An off-the-rack, nondenominational, evangelical Protestant?

Let’s face it, the post-denominational world is very complex and that reality is not going away anytime soon. Honest.

For example, I ran across the following passage in a Washington Times recent column by veteran Godbeat reporter Julia “Stairway to Heaven” Duin. She was describing some frank remarks by the Rev. Robert Jeffress of First Baptist Church in Dallas, aired out for all to hear during a forum at the Religion Newswriters Association meetings here in Washington, D.C. Some of the religion-beat pros were stunned when Jeffress made it perfectly clear that he thought it was crucial for America to be led by Christians — period.

“I believe we should always support a Christian over a non-Christian,” Mr. Jeffress said, according to the Religion News Service. (I was not taking notes.) … What’s important, he emphasized, is that Christians rule the nation instead of unbelievers.

Having lived four years in Texas, I know plenty of folks there who feel that way. Many of the evangelicals I cover would agree with him, too. But many of the journalists in the crowd acted as though Mr. Jeffress was from the Blue Lagoon. I could see some of the scribes practically hyperventilating as the pastor talked. I could hear muttered comments. “The nerve!” “How dare he?” “Where did they find this guy?”

Indeed, where did they find him? This leads me to the Duin passage that I think is relevant to the firestorm surrounding Palin.

You see, there are Americans out there whose beliefs are similar to those of Palin and, yes, even Jeffress. First Baptist Dallas is not a small church. Thus, Duin provides this punchy summary of the frightening facts:

There’s a whole world out there into which many in the media rarely venture. At this same religion-writer event, I picked up “Outreach,” a magazine on how to “grow” bigger churches. According to it, the three leading church-growth states are California, Texas and Georgia. Florida and Arizona aren’t far behind.

They found the largest 100 churches in the country have a combined attendance of 1,128,451, or 11,000 people per church. One of the fastest-growing congregations (No. 4) was McLean Bible Church in the Virginia suburbs, which added 3,399 people last year. Another is in the Maryland suburbs: Reid Temple AME Church in Glenn Dale, at 7,500 souls. (Outreach claimed it was up by 50 percent over the previous year.)

The magazine said nondenominational Christian churches lead the pack, followed by independent Baptists, Southern Baptists and the Assemblies of God. I noticed every pastor they cite is male. Almost no church has a denominational tag — such as Methodist, Lutheran or Presbyterian — to its name. Very few of these churches belong to the mainline Protestants. Most have names like New Life Church, the Rock Church, Potter’s House and Grace Community. …

Fellow ink-stained wretches, there’s a lot of folks in flyover land who feel the same way he does. In fact, they outnumber us.

ED AI148 book09 NS 20080901141807Now, before you think that Duin has signed a contract to do public relations for the nation’s megachurches, let me shamelessly point you toward her new book, which is called “Quitting Church: Why the Faithful Are Fleeing and What to Do About It.” Click here for a large chunk of it. Also, here’s a Wall Street Journal review and here’s my own Scripps Howard News Service column about Duin’s own remarks at another RNA panel.

You see, there is a paradox out there in megachurch land. It seems that they are in the best of times and, perhaps, in the worst of times.

Membership statistics are high, but in many cases they are stalled on a plateau. It’s a large plateau, but there is evidence that some of the natives are not happy. Some are slipping out the back door. In a column about this trend behind the large statistics, Duin adds:

… Not all is well in the evangelical house. There are a few canary-in-a-coal-mine figures, such as a continual annual decline in baptisms in the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) — the nation’s largest Protestant group. The SBC numbers its membership at 16 million, but 6.1 million actually attend the major worship services each week, according to the SBC’s 2007 annual report. Among its young people, baptisms fell 40 percent between 1980 and 2005.

Then there was a survey of 15,000 people taken a year ago by Willow Creek Community Church, a huge congregation outside of Chicago. The results were disturbing: the older the Christian, the more dissatisfied he or she was with the church. Researchers identified two segments of unhappy Christians — the spiritually “stalled” and the “dissatisfied.” The latter were mature Christians who felt church was keeping them from growing. Together, they made up 25 percent of those polled. That’s a big market share of fed-up consumers.

This is one of those cases where reporters have to hold two big ideas in their heads at the same time. The megachurches remain large and powerful. They are not going away. Yet there may be new stories — sobering stories, for evangelicals — emerging in the shadows of those huge sanctuaries. I urge other journalists to check out Duin’s book and then try to figure out how to handle the news implications of both of these trends.

Print Friendly

About TMatt

Terry Mattingly directs the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. He writes a weekly column for the Scripps Howard News Service.

  • http://www.mikehickerson.com Mike Hickerson

    Doesn’t this article combine two unrelated stories, though? I don’t get how the size of megachurches is related to Jeffress’ comments, other than as a scare tactic.

  • Molly

    If size is only numbers, I see the problem. Size should (in a perfect world) be about the depth of commitment to the body of Christ, something I’m reading into the spaces between the lines here.

  • Dave

    Researchers identified two segments of unhappy Christians — the spiritually “stalled” and the “dissatisfied.”

    The same two cohorts can be found among Unitarian Universalists (who use different names for them). It’s not just a Christian phenomenon. MSM reporters who track GR, please note!

  • Jerry

    try to figure out how to handle the news implications of both of these trends.

    That’s a great point. I think we’re in the middle of a time of massive change and keeping track of what is going on, including tracking apparently contradictory trends, requires top notch journalism.

  • Pingback: The good, the bad, and the megachurches : The Daily Scroll

  • David

    So it sounds like the megachurches probably have something of a revolving door. They get them in, but can’t keep them. Alternatively, the megachurches takeover leaves some of those old time religion types cheerless, though maybe that’s a good thing. This reminds me as well of the Lifeway Resources study of their own people who said their ideal of a church building is a gothic-like sanctuary over the modern (or postmodern, for that matter) sanctuary. Not sure if this makes sense, but to me the “implications” referred to in this article are somewhere along these lines.

  • http://rhog.blogspot.com Citizen Grim

    I worked briefly at Willow Creek several years back, and it’s understandable why people “felt church was keeping them from growing.” Willow’s emphasis was on reaching new people in the community and I felt like their deeper teaching and discipleship was lacking.

    Reaching ‘seekers’ is an important mission, yes, but we must be careful not to sacrifice the library to expand the foyer.

  • http://onlinefaith.blogspot.com C. Wingate

    The demographics of church joining/leaving are very poorly understood, and there’s a great deal of mythology going about, passed along by people with a theory to push. Another part of the problem is that the necessary statistics, for the most part, aren’t kept. Back when the 2006 “red book” of Episcopal Church statistics came out, I crunched some numbers and came up with the somewhat surprising conclusion that the losses in Episcopal membership may largely be coming out of middle-aged membership.

    Information about non-denoms is surely much poorer and more anecdotal due to the lack of denominational structures in which statistics are gathered. But in general folk/media explanations don’t pay a lot of attention to non-religious forces which affect membership numbers. For example, Kirk Hadaway’s 2004 paper on denominational trends showed a strong correlation between EC membership trends and birthrate for white Americans. I suspect that such pressures also apply for individual congregations. For instance, the Presbyterian church I grew up in was blessed with an extremely dynamic pastor at the time, but it was also blessed with being founded in the midst of a group of subdivisions which had also all just been founded, therefore providing it with a wealth of young couples with young kids. Those same subdivisions have a lot fewer kids now, partly because people are having smaller families, but also because they are not so uniform in population. It would be hard for that church to repeat the same kind of growth because the neighborhood cannot support it. On the other hand, McLean Bible Church’s phenomenal growth was surely fueled in part by the population of McLean doubling between 1970 and 1980. If the church’s growth has slowed, this is not too surprising; population growth has also slowed, and one suspects that the demographics have shifted toward a more mature community less dominated by new homeowners.

  • Trierr

    The SBC numbers she mentions have some interesting politics attached. The absolute SBC numbers have actually started to decline. What nobody is talking about is the resolution passed last summer for SBC churches to start cleaning up their roles. The side affect of this is that it will give a rationalization over the next several years for why the SBC numbers are shrinking, allowing the denomination to postpone dealing with the politics of declining members.