The Kill List and The Choice

Some conservatives seem baffled that I’m not signed up for the Good Ship Romney yet. I’m not “undecided.” I’m waiting to see if he asserts or rejects the right–claimed by Obama–of creating a kill list that includes American citizens, without even providing evidence of their crimes. I’m waiting to get some flicker of a sense from Romney that our drone war is illegal and immoral. Just a little something.

Although I’m hoping Romney gives some indication before election day that he thinks this is wrong, I doubt it’s going to come. He seems firmly cast in the neo-con Empire-builder mold, which is an utter betrayal of bedrock conservative principles.

This post by Jason Kuznicki has been circulating on Facebook today, and it catches the problem quite well:

Barack Obama has a kill list.

Its legal justification is a secret. Its contents are secret, too. You don’t get to see who’s on it. Nor do any members of Congress. Nor any federal judges. Basically no one does.

How does someone end up on it? Obama decides. He decides with a small group of people, all of whom hold their jobs at his pleasure.

Whatever methods they use, they’re secret, too. The evidence — you guessed it — is secret. If there even is any.

We don’t know much about the kill list, but we do know a few things. We know it can include American citizens. That’s already happened. We know it can include American citizens who are minors. That’s already happened, too.

We know that the kill list is valid anywhere in the world: Obama claims the authority to kill these people wherever they may be, including within the United States. Including children sleeping peacefully in their homes.

We know that no one gets to review his decision. Ever. The ones who might do it have all abdicated the responsibility.

If Obama wanted to, he could put all of Mitt Romney’s delightful, gingham-clad grandkids on the kill list, then send commandos to kill them (or drones, it hardly matters). He wouldn’t need to show any cause, and no one could stop him or tell him otherwise.

Do not say that he wouldn’t. Of course he wouldn’t. The problem is that someone else might. And that’s enough.

Do not tell me that I need to vote for him… because you are afraid that he will lose. He deserves to lose.

And worse. He deserves to walk onstage not to cheers, but to hisses, boos, and a shower of rotten vegetables. He deserves a place in presidential history somewhere far beneath Warren Harding or Richard Nixon, both now counted rank amateurs when it comes to subverting the republic. Obama deserves the reputation of a Catiline or a Hipparchus, if only we remembered who they were.

No, I don’t think Romney would be better. For the next four years, government by kill list is baked in the cake. Romney’s been mum about the whole thing, and that’s just what we would expect from someone who thinks himself worthy of the power, and who hopes to enjoy it come January.

Read it all. He’s right, and that phrase–government by kill list is baked in the cake–is a keeper. This is what precedent does. No one gives up power. Even after Caesar was given 23 pokes with a dagger, we still got Nero. The power clings to the office, not the man, and it only grows, and overgrows. In a garden, if you leave something to grow too long, it will eventually burst and rot. As with tomatoes, so with power.

I’m sorry to see the rotting phase in my country in my lifetime. I don’t know how to turn it back. We really are faced with only two choices in this election, and both of them are unappealing options. I have no real illusions here: the ruinous policies of the last four years must end. But being complicit with a grave evil isn’t high on my list of things to do, and delivering death on Pakistani wedding parties and Afghan funerals (and all for the most dubious strategic and tactical ends) is a grave evil if there ever was one. I’m fortunate that my state–New Jersey–is irrelevant in the national election: it’s all blue all the time. I could write in Rand Paul (who I can support without hesitation) and be perfectly satisfied with my choice, and not cause a ripple in the results, but that’s a cowards way out.

I already know what Obama will do: kill them all, and let God sort them out. There’s some hope Romney will be different. I may just cling to that slender thread and pull the “R” lever. I just want Mitt to give me something to justify that other than “NotObama.” His debate performance gave me hope that he can be a decent president. Now I want him to give me hope that he can be a decent man.

At some point, I need Romney to show that he understands our problems are here, in America, and not over there, in the sandbox. They have to find their own way and solve their own problems. Or not. As a wise man once said, we accomplish nothing when we “fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.”

Except the tent isn’t empty, and we’re not hitting a camel. We’re hitting them:

Are you okay with that?

Because I’m not.

Game Con Threatens to Leave Indiana Over Conscience Protection Bill
Ted Cruz Is Using Christians For Political Ends UPDATED
Why Obama's Rhetoric About Christian Violence Was a Problem
Idaho Ministers May Be Forced to Perform Gay Weddings
About Thomas L. McDonald

Thomas L. McDonald writes about technology, theology, history, games, and shiny things. Details of his rather uneventful life as a professional writer and magazine editor can be found in the About tab.

  • Jonathan F. Sullivan

    This is why my political philosophy is “A pox on both their houses.”

  • victor

    The only possible justification I have for believing things would be better in a Romney presidency on this front (on every other front I have TONS of justification for believing things would better) would be that the media would no longer be complicit in a presidential kill list with a Republican president in the White House. Put an “R” after the president’s name, and the Drone War will be front-page news and leading the 6:00 broadcasts on all the networks.

  • J’Nell

    I cannot leave a communist in power because he won’t say anything about this one issue. It’s sickening – yes – however we should all die at this communists hands and our children have no future and Christianity wiped off the face of the earth because we don’t here one thing we want to hear? I will vote Romney to stop the elimination of the United States of America and all the good we have done throughtout the last 250 years.

  • Thomas L. McDonald

    I don’t disagree with that, and if I lived in a battleground state, my choice would be obvious. However, I live in a blue state, so maybe my vote is more useful as a tiny gesture toward redirecting the Republican party back to their conservative, pro-life, small government roots.

  • Ted Seeber

    Only thing I notice is this: Drones or Commandos *does matter*. Commandos are doing something active, engaging their brain, and thus also potentially activating their conscience to reject illegal orders.

    Drones are run by 18 year old recruits playing video games.

    There’s a HUGE difference between the two. A difference that should scare everybody now that drones are legal in USA Airspace.

  • Stefanie

    My husband (Vietnam vet) and I had this discussion just today. I am so very distressed about the Tuesday Kill List that our President has boasted about. But my husband pointed out that War has changed. Just as it made the leap from perfectly formed columns descending upon one another to mustard gas in WWI to tank wars and Nuclear weapons in WWII to the guerilla warfare having its day in Vietnam — we have ‘evolved’ to drone wars. An impersonable way of warfare. In thinking about that, I remember when I was first introduced to it via the movie “Clear and Present Danger”– at the time, it was weird to think that someone could order a drone bomb to target a particular place from a ‘war room’ thousands of miles away.
    We are living in disconcerting times …and I am grateful that the LORD God remains my rock and my refuge, my everpresent help in all situations.

  • Reluctant Liberal

    Excellent post. Thank you for pointing out this issue. It’s downright disturbing how little attention it’s gotten.

  • bill bannon

    I agree with your husband. The alternative realistically to the drones in northwest Pakistan is the Pakistani military who by one count have a 46% civilian casuality rate…probably because they are overusing artillery when they should be using house to house infantry which is more dangerous to them. Civilians will be killed either way as long as militants stay in civilian areas. Drones will kill fewer civilians than armies overusing artillery. Civilians are only safe in wars that occur in open battlefields. Urban fighting means civilian deaths.
    The book of Judith is about a gorgeous woman assassinating Holofernes which made the masses of her people safer.

  • Tim

    Give us a source for the picture, please! I’d like to draw attention to this issue, but many people I would share with won’t even read far enough to see the picture. Thank you.

  • Thomas L. McDonald

    It was originally BBC, but I couldn’t find it on their site. It’s also here. Moral Low Ground also reprinted it.

  • Tim

    Where is “here”? There is no link.